B3 after 2 long nets.
H4L after one net.
GM players after a short and sweet innings for 38 runs.
All 3 have a few things in common, they were used by the same player, the middle got more action than the edges, and all of them are terrific bats. But sadly all of them had wear and tear along the edges very early and had to be fixed. Does this make these bats bad value for money, not at all because that’s expected of top end bats. Light for their weight and pressed differently than lower grade bats.
For comparison the CA below was used for 1.5 years and was used way more than all 3 bats above combined. Removed the scuffsheet and took these pictures: