I bought one of the special offer xt black 5.0 from Actvinstinct last week. It arrived quickly and I was so impressed with the weight (2lb6.8oz) and pick up that I ordered the 3.0 as well with the idea that it might be even better and prettier and I could return whichever I liked least.
The 3.0 arrived late, so they refunded my postage, which was good. The comparison was quite interesting though. Both bats came up at an amazing 2lb6.8oz, but their profiles were significantly different. The 5.0 was obviously a denser cleft, with smaller edges, shoulder and spine, also significantly thinner toe. For the same weight, the 3.0 has 37mm edges and 60mm spine which is impressive. I've put some pictures of the bats below. The 3.0 has a very similar profile to the Mrf Kohli shape, and the edges /spine are almost as big (but not quite). The handles are both very thin ovals and feel fine in the hand at this weight.
Both bats have almost identical balancing point as well. The denser 5.0 does definitely pick up lighter though. So now I have the problem of choosing which should be returned. I expect I'll keep the 3.0 as the profile is closer to my other match bat and only cost £35 more. But it definitely picks up heavier. Maybe because some of the mass is placed further behind the axis of the handle?
Any thoughts or recommendations from forumites welcome...
This does illustrate that grade of willow could matter for performance. It's OK if the two clefts have same density. But if they don't then the lower grade denser cleft will have to have wood taken off it to achieve the same weight...
Pics of both bats :
https://photos.app.goo.gl/k5K39TWkyfinFtrA6Pics of xt black 3.0 (still in cellophane) and comparison with MRF:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/AmTbrWnanVPXkgCC8Pics of xt black 5.0:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/xPQqS1rvhLnGyxSg8