Topic: Low, mid and high (Read 1323 times)

jonny77 · « **on:** April 15, 2020, 05:36:03 PM »

Just interested to see what everyone would class as low, mid and high middles in terms of sweet spot? Measured on the face from the toe to the peak of the spine.

Gurujames · « **Reply #1 on:** April 15, 2020, 06:01:28 PM »

For me:
Low up to 1400mm from toe
Mid 140-220mm
High 220mm+
I prefer a mid/high middle

Gurujames · « **Reply #2 on:** April 15, 2020, 08:20:34 PM »

I�d say you�ve got it pretty well spot on Dorsetdan. The only low middle bat I�ve got at the moment is my friends M&H original low which has a middle at 140mm, so that�s where that measurement has come from.

Chalkie · « **Reply #3 on:** April 15, 2020, 08:37:10 PM »

If it helps as a reference the middles on my xp80 and GN Warner are both around 230/240 and would definitely classify that as high

jonny77 · « **Reply #4 on:** April 15, 2020, 08:37:49 PM »

I'd go with that I think and was just talking aesthetically, so tried to put the spine peak as the marker.

Interesting though and just made me think what people's perceptions were when I saw @SOULMAN1012 G&Fs, as to him they were maybe on the higher side of middle, but to me they looked really high. Suppose it's all down to the individual to some extent.

I'm looking at some stock shapes, so this is something I've been considering.

Gurujames · « **Reply #5 on:** April 15, 2020, 08:39:57 PM »

Just taken some more measurements what I consider:
Low
M&H original low - 140mm
Mid
H4L warbird -180mm
B&S supreme - 180mm
High
Aldred supreme - 220mm
Garrard and Flack - 230mm
These are at the maximum swell position rather than where the sweet spot may be.

jonny77 · « **Reply #6 on:** April 15, 2020, 08:59:07 PM »

Thanks @Gurujames Interesting to see that and does show as Dan says its small changes.

Author Topic: Low, mid and high (Read 1323 times)

jonny77

Low, mid and high

Gurujames

Re: Low, mid and high

Gurujames

Re: Low, mid and high

Chalkie

Re: Low, mid and high

jonny77

Re: Low, mid and high

Gurujames

Re: Low, mid and high

jonny77

Re: Low, mid and high