I think that branding does play a role. I got my first bat from Ed Garrard at the start of last year purely on the basis that I thought that the branding is as good as anything there is on the market. There wasn't much I could find online from anyone reviewing the performance. As it happens it is a great bat and I have picked up another one this year (and I will certainly go to him again) but when taking a punt on something unknown, branding is important.It certainly isn't the be all and end all though. My main match bat at the moment is a B3 and I have to concede that I neither like the name nor the branding
Branding plays a huge part. For example BB and Phantom are where TK made. One is £300 for G1 and the other £450 yet people are prepared to pay £150 more for the same bat but different stickers.
Let’s see if the following can get a few more pages out of this thread 😂 : why is b3/GM not on this list? They surely make some of the best bats out of the UK. And if using machines was an issue, TK would be disqualified as well. The only ‘skill’ left in making a good bat is pressing and handling... shapes can be made by machines, and a “hand crafted” shape is no better than a “machine crafted” shape.
I love GM bats (and have one now) and I admire their continued success, but B3 and GM are not, in my (mediocre) opinion, traditional batmaking - and so wouldn't be included.
Branding does play a huge part, but phantom aren’t TK made.
I had originally envisaged hand-crafted, traditional UK batmaking. Like John at Red Ink, H4L, Garrard, Rob Pack, Kember and so on. I read an article that suggested there are 20 proper bat makers in the UK. Are there that many? I love GM bats (and have one now) and I admire their continued success, but B3 and GM are not, in my (mediocre) opinion, traditional batmaking - and so wouldn't be included.