Hi all,
Thanks for all of the responses - I appreciate you all taking the time. I will try to respond to all in this single response.
In terms of grade, both are 1+ grade willow. The difference, as was explained to me, is that they do not advise the LE bat because those with 12+ grains have a very short shelf life and I suppose I was just extremely lucky that my previous high grained bat lasted a long time.
I think the profiles are the same. I don't have my old bat but I remember picking it up and it felt exactly the same. The problem, I suspect, is that the areas not in the middle are, whether short or long term, not as pingy as on the old bat so I just notice it more. It picks up beautifully. Actually, I think I notice it more because it is a new bat and I don't trust it so when I mistime one, I am looking at the bat rather than my inability to hit a proper cover drive.
I know that I tried to use it too early in a match, before it was ready, and it felt not great at all. I know this because there were strong seam marks from the new ball. I presumed that when they said they would knock it in, that it would be match ready. I learned this was not the case but it was the problem with a bat breaking mid season. This planted the seed that there was something wrong.
A few follow up questions
1. 'typically less dense' - what does that mean in terms of performance and also quite literally?
2. ' Old one feels softer' - again, what do you mean by that?
3. Why am I oiling it again? It has only been used 10 times total (net and 2 matches)
4. Mallet work - is it still valuable at this point when I have properly worked on it (after I used it too early in a match). I suppose this leads to my more general question which is do bats massively improve over a period of time.
Cheers