Heartwood vs Sapwood porosity
Advertise on CBF

Author Topic: Heartwood vs Sapwood porosity  (Read 2873 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Rez

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 125
  • Trade Count: (0)
Heartwood vs Sapwood porosity
« on: May 25, 2021, 06:41:31 PM »

That's it... you read it right  :D

There are always lots of debates about which is best, stronger, lighter etc but was giving a new blade a bit of new blade lovin' and thought I would share a very obvious observation.

New bat, pretty much half and half... quite grainy (a bit wobbly but grainy nonetheless). Applied quite a healthy first layer of linseed oil as I like to do and generally return after an hour or so to lightly wipe away any excess and then leave for a couple of days to fully soak in.

So when I returned to the bat after a while, there was a very obvious divide where on the sapwood side any excess oil had already soaked in fully but the heartwood side seemed far less porous and most of the oil was still sat on top.

Not earth shattering but to a bat geek it was an interesting sight so just thought I would share! Maybe heartwood makes for a better wet weather bat.....
Logged

Buzz

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12714
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Clear your mind, stay still and watch the ball
Re: Heartwood vs Sapwood porosity
« Reply #1 on: May 26, 2021, 12:50:56 PM »

Good question, I always thought the heartwood was dryer and more brittle, but there maybe more to it.
Was the bat flat or was it lying at an angle?
Logged
"Bradman didn't used to have any trigger movements or anything like that. He turned batting into a subconscious act" Tony Shillinglaw.

SouthpawMark

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 997
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Heartwood vs Sapwood porosity
« Reply #2 on: May 26, 2021, 01:01:12 PM »

Isn’t heartwood denser, therefore less area for the oil to seep in to?
Logged
Bat perv.

AJ2014

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1402
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Heartwood vs Sapwood porosity
« Reply #3 on: May 26, 2021, 01:28:03 PM »

Isn’t heartwood denser, therefore less area for the oil to seep in to?
Yep, Mark
Heartwood will never take as much oil in as sapwood!
Logged
Life is shorter than my batting inning!

Kai

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 150
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Heartwood vs Sapwood porosity
« Reply #4 on: May 26, 2021, 01:57:56 PM »

Hmm... I was always taught that heartwood soaks in more oil compared to sap wood as its drier? Maybe I am wrong? Can anyone confirm?
Logged

AJ2014

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1402
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Heartwood vs Sapwood porosity
« Reply #5 on: May 26, 2021, 02:19:04 PM »

Hmm... I was always taught that heartwood soaks in more oil compared to sap wood as its drier? Maybe I am wrong? Can anyone confirm?
Yes Kai, you're wrong about this, but that's a general thought, as practically, heartwood takes much less oil in.
Logged
Life is shorter than my batting inning!

Rez

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 125
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Heartwood vs Sapwood porosity
« Reply #6 on: May 26, 2021, 02:27:24 PM »

Good question, I always thought the heartwood was dryer and more brittle, but there maybe more to it.
Was the bat flat or was it lying at an angle?

Exactly, everything you read always suggests heartwood is drier. The bat was as flat as flat could be, you would be happy to build a house on one of my bats that has been oiled!

I should have taken a picture as it was like when it only rains on one side of the road. Oil level applied evenly across the blade, left perfectly flat and after about an hour the 'oil on top'/'no oil on top' divide perfectly followed the heartwood/sapwood boundary for the full length of the blade.
Logged
 

Advertise on CBF