I dare say if it had no effect on making better bats then Tim probably wouldn't waste his time doing it.
I see pressing as a strength of the keeley brand so certainly worth a mention in their bat descriptions.
I could find plenty of completely irrelevant and/or generic bat descriptions which would rightly be labelled as guff.
And I think you are being a little sensitive with your last sentence there. I will remove the quotation marks now
As I said to
@SurreySam you can believe me, or not, but unfortunately it is a fact that pressing in three different stages won't make the bat better.
Think about it logically for a second...all pressing is, is compressing the fibres of the bat, do you really think the fibres react differently when some have been removed to make the cleft look like a bat?
Pressing is a strength of Tim's, correct, but it's not the fact that he presses it three different times. It could be the fact that he owns 2 different presses that perform different functions for example, or as I've said before, the fact that he's been doing this getting on 40 years.
Perhaps I was being a little sensitive, apologies.