Ashes 2023
Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 42

Author Topic: Ashes 2023  (Read 32534 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Thor Odin’s Son

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 262
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Ashes 2023
« Reply #285 on: July 02, 2023, 10:35:01 AM »

DRS overturns another howler. How can an icc ‘elite’ umpire miss Stokes’ inside edge there? The ball literally went at right angles smh
Logged

alba caerulea

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1576
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Re: Ashes 2023
« Reply #286 on: July 02, 2023, 11:59:15 AM »

Whilst we're on the subject of village dismissals .....
Logged

rickjames

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5094
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Ashes 2023
« Reply #287 on: July 02, 2023, 12:09:44 PM »

Stokes is just an absolute warrior
Logged

jonny77

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2423
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Ashes 2023
« Reply #288 on: July 02, 2023, 12:19:13 PM »

The Bairstow one will divide opinion. If you're an Aussie (or a CBF member who doesn't rate Bairstow😆), you'll see no issue. For me, it's naive from Bairstow but poor from Carey. It's almost like a mankad if someone isn't trying to actually steal a run, it's in the rules but against the spirit somehow. Bairstow was batting in his ground, then marks it again before moving and wasn't trying to steal a run or gain any advantage. So it just feels cheap to me.
Logged

alba caerulea

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1576
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Re: Ashes 2023
« Reply #289 on: July 02, 2023, 12:41:35 PM »

The Bairstow one will divide opinion. If you're an Aussie (or a CBF member who doesn't rate Bairstow😆), you'll see no issue. For me, it's naive from Bairstow but poor from Carey. It's almost like a mankad if someone isn't trying to actually steal a run, it's in the rules but against the spirit somehow. Bairstow was batting in his ground, then marks it again before moving and wasn't trying to steal a run or gain any advantage. So it just feels cheap to me.

Im neither australian or a bairstow hater. But on this occasion I feel the dismissal is just about fair.

Accepted that he is not attempting a run but Carey lets go of it immediately, there wasn't a huge pause. The ball was nowhere near 'dead'.

Actually brilliant keeping (Carey has been brilliant all series so far) and I feel if he was stood up to the stumps and this happened it wouldn't even be a conversation.

A shame because Bairstow was playing sensibly for lunch until that point and it could have made for some great viewing this afternoon if he was still there.
Logged

Bats_Entertainment

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5054
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Ashes 2023
« Reply #290 on: July 02, 2023, 12:44:18 PM »

Stuart Broad x spirit of cricket.  :(
Logged

ppccopener

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7790
  • Trade Count: (+6)
Re: Ashes 2023
« Reply #291 on: July 02, 2023, 12:50:03 PM »

I’m neither a hater or an Aussie too. It’s dead if the keeper hangs onto the ball but it’s still live unless umps calls over at the end.

It’s out according to the rules and a bit of dopey batting.

Seems to of tired us up so we go down swinging which is better than meekly surrendering

There’s always Broad to put petrol on the fire too. Even the members have woken up
Logged

jonny77

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2423
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Ashes 2023
« Reply #292 on: July 02, 2023, 01:07:19 PM »

Fair enough. I just feel it's a bit poor personally. I'm not saying it's not within the rules, or that Bairstow wasnt dopey, just that to me it didn't sit right. If he was attempting to gain an advantage, then fair enough, but he wasn't. He out under the laws of the game tho, so it's immaterial I suppose
« Last Edit: July 02, 2023, 01:22:38 PM by jonny77 »
Logged

alba caerulea

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1576
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Re: Ashes 2023
« Reply #293 on: July 02, 2023, 01:10:38 PM »

Fair enough. I just feel it's a bit poor personally. I'm not saying it's not within the rules, or that Bairstow want dopey, just that to me ot didn't sit right. If he was attempting to gain an advantage, then fair enough, but he wasn't so just didn't sit right. He out under the laws of the game tho, so it's immaterial I suppose

In a friendly/village level cricket I would agree.

This is the Ashes and this is Australia. They'd steal your car if they thought the umpires weren't looking.
Logged

ppccopener

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7790
  • Trade Count: (+6)
Re: Ashes 2023
« Reply #294 on: July 02, 2023, 01:59:28 PM »

Bairstow touched back which would be enough in any cricket we play but not enough under the rules.

Its fired up Stokes so at least the crowd are getting entertained. Broad showing some guts too which is good to see. Think he likes being the bad guy to against Australia.
Logged

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6752
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Ashes 2023
« Reply #295 on: July 02, 2023, 02:51:03 PM »

Bairstow touched back which would be enough in any cricket we play but not enough under the rules.

Pretty much - you can see the bowlers end umpire unclips Green's cap and walks away from his post, so clearly he also thought the ball was dead.  Its just about right under the laws of the game, but even in a Test Match it'd feel grubby to me not to withdraw the appeal because its reprehensible under the spirit. 
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

ppccopener

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7790
  • Trade Count: (+6)
Re: Ashes 2023
« Reply #296 on: July 02, 2023, 03:02:02 PM »

Probably a hangover from the Starc catch where the Aussies felt it was a good catch.
 
Seemed obviously not out to me but there are plenty thinking it’s a clean catch
Logged

Thor Odin’s Son

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 262
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Ashes 2023
« Reply #297 on: July 02, 2023, 03:11:31 PM »

The mistakes of 2019 somewhat vanquished. 2-0 and heading to Leeds to retain the Ashes - Smith wasn’t there in 2019, he will be this time around.
First time in 22 years we have won 3 consecutive Tests in England.
Logged

alexhilly1492

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3117
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Ashes 2023
« Reply #298 on: July 02, 2023, 03:27:21 PM »

We have handed them a 2-0 lead

Poor bowling back end (and 21 no balls) at edgbaston

Handing them a 91 run lead first innings lead at lord's then lost by 43

I genuinely believe a little more "sensible" (less Bazball) cricket and we have a 2-0 lead rather than deficit

Really hope we win this 3-2 now

Got hard at them, claim everything, spirit of the game clearly means nothing to pat and co.

Bairstow was dopey, and by the book it's out, but there's a way of playing, they've let that down

Even the umpired assumed the ball dead.
Logged
HS: 77*, 73*, 61*, 61*, 54*, 50*
BB: 7-4-9-5, 7.3-0-29-5

Bats_Entertainment

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5054
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Ashes 2023
« Reply #299 on: July 02, 2023, 04:03:47 PM »

If you middle a ball to slip and neglect to walk off, you forfeit the right to ever even mention the 'spirit of cricket', IMHO.

Logged
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 42
 

Advertise on CBF