Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34 ... 43

Author Topic: ENG vs PAK -  (Read 45306 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

mattw

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2259
  • Trade Count: (+9)
    • PRYZM Cricket
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #465 on: September 17, 2010, 02:46:41 PM »

What a stupid run out on Afridi's account, just get yourself in and then worry about everything else...
Logged

petehosk

  • Administrator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 8815
  • Trade Count: (+39)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #466 on: September 17, 2010, 02:48:42 PM »

He was a bit! So he only has himself to blame!
Would be nice if we could have the luxury of winning the ODI series this early.......

It's supposed to be a decent wicket so hopefully we'll chase it down comfortably!  ???
Logged

mattw

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2259
  • Trade Count: (+9)
    • PRYZM Cricket
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #467 on: September 17, 2010, 02:51:02 PM »

Look at his second run, he basically strolls it - absolutely diabolical for an international cricketer.

Looking forward to the run chase though with Strauss and Davies opening.
Logged

petehosk

  • Administrator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 8815
  • Trade Count: (+39)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #468 on: September 17, 2010, 02:54:17 PM »

England do bat very deep these days! Swanny at 10? He's a very good ODI batsman!
I think Pakistan need to set 290-300 unless England batting collapses!
Logged

Jeet

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1082
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #469 on: September 17, 2010, 02:57:23 PM »

England do bat very deep these days! Swanny at 10? He's a very good ODI batsman!
I think Pakistan need to set 290-300 unless England batting collapses!
Pete I don'y buy this batting depth theory. If your top 5-6 get skittled for say 40 odd, then you can't hope your tailenders will bail you out. Bresnan Swann, Broad are OK if you chasing 20 runs off 20 balls, but 150 off 20 overs would be out of reach
Logged
"Commit all your crimes when Sachin is batting", "They will go unnoticed because even the Lord is watching".

petehosk

  • Administrator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 8815
  • Trade Count: (+39)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #470 on: September 17, 2010, 03:00:13 PM »

You say that, but when England were in dire straights and Trott was the only guy batting well. And Broad rescued the innings then! So they need the ability! If that had of been Monty, then game over!  >:(
Logged

mattw

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2259
  • Trade Count: (+9)
    • PRYZM Cricket
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #471 on: September 17, 2010, 03:02:00 PM »

I wouldn't say 150 off 20 is out of reach of the lower order

the likes of Swann, Broad, Bresnan, Wright/Bopara can hold a bat and have scored some good runs in the past - I'm sure they'll have to do something of the sort in the World Cup...
Logged

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #472 on: September 17, 2010, 03:03:42 PM »

Never discount the importance of a lower order who can bat always helps as long as they are in the team for their main string ie a good enough bowler not just because they can bat a bit aswell
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

Jeet

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1082
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #473 on: September 17, 2010, 03:06:47 PM »

Never discount the importance of a lower order who can bat always helps as long as they are in the team for their main string ie a good enough bowler not just because they can bat a bit aswell

I'm not discounting it.

You say that, but when England were in dire straights and Trott was the only guy batting well. And Broad rescued the innings then! So they need the ability! If that had of been Monty, then game over!  >:(

It was vs Bangladesh, sides like India, SA, Aus wouldn't allow hat to happen

I wouldn't say 150 off 20 is out of reach of the lower order

the likes of Swann, Broad, Bresnan, Wright/Bopara can hold a bat and have scored some good runs in the past - I'm sure they'll have to do something of the sort in the World Cup...
Once the rate gets that high, the pressure mounts. There's a reason why these guys bat at 7-10....
Logged
"Commit all your crimes when Sachin is batting", "They will go unnoticed because even the Lord is watching".

petehosk

  • Administrator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 8815
  • Trade Count: (+39)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #474 on: September 17, 2010, 03:07:49 PM »

Whatever happens, Pakistan will have to bowl really well!
Score is liklely to be 250-270 on a batting wicket which has been averaging 285-290!
So anything is possible assuming the bowlers come to the party!!
Logged

Jeet

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1082
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #475 on: September 17, 2010, 03:10:24 PM »

Whatever happens, Pakistan will have to bowl really well!
Score is liklely to be 250-270 on a batting wicket which has been averaging 285-290!
So anything is possible assuming the bowlers come to the party!!
Doubt it Pete, if Pakistan win this I'll be in a state of shock.
Logged
"Commit all your crimes when Sachin is batting", "They will go unnoticed because even the Lord is watching".

johan95

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3376
  • Trade Count: (+105)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #476 on: September 17, 2010, 07:14:18 PM »

Well it's tense now!! Pete, Strauss has Bern using that bat in all shortform cricket this summer: there have been lots of pictures of him with it in nets etc..
Logged

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #477 on: September 17, 2010, 07:14:48 PM »

We will see if the extra " all rounders " work then
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

Ayrtek Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14749
  • Trade Count: (+53)
  • www.AyrtekCricket.com
    • Ayrtek Cricket
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #478 on: September 17, 2010, 07:15:35 PM »

close finish but should get over the line...i hope!
Logged

Riddy

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1057
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #479 on: September 17, 2010, 07:21:36 PM »

its in pakistans hands now :/
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34 ... 43
 

Advertise on CBF