Print

[RoCo Da Pixie]

I prefer 1 & 3

[roco]

1&2 for me nice long mid middle and nice low middle not much need for alot else on English wickets

[uknsaunders]

I prefer 1 & 3

with you on that - 1 seems the best to me. I'm assuming they are all the same weight?

[Ayrtek Cricket]

no all differ in weight due to the profiles....2.11, 2.12. 2.9 and 2.8 from left to right in the pictures

[Buzz]

personally I think 3 and 4 are pretty similar - but I do like them. My first choice from those is 3 then 1.

[Colesy]

I like 3 and 4

[uknsaunders]

3 seems to have a big toe considering it's 2-3 ounces lighter. Difficult to work out from the pics, what are the edge, toe, spine heights?

[Ayrtek Cricket]

Will have to have a measure up when I'm bk in the office on weds know 1 has 30mm and 3 has 35mm I think Others are prob 30mm

[jonpinson]

Trouble is Tom as they are all different weights, it makes it more difficult to appraise them. I'd have thought they'd have supplied the same weights for absolute comparison.

[Tom]

As they're machined they just get made to one size, the weight then varies due to willow density.

Far left my fave.

[Ayrtek Cricket]

Yeh it was more to look at the positions of the Middles etc in all honesty than make a direct comparism. Obviously all pick up differently due to this factor.

Everyone in the bristol area seems to like the profile we used last year as pitches are generally slow and low down here. Looking beyond the local area it obviously differs

[uknsaunders]

easy way to solve that - bring out a jumbo profile, I'd buy it

[Ayrtek Cricket]

gotta love the retro jumbo!!!

[Canners]

i'l have all 4 please Tom, you can put them on my tab haha

[FattusCattus]

I think you had better put the one on the left to one side for me Tommo, until we have a chance to make beautiful business music together!