Advertise on CBF
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 7

Author Topic: Did anyone see a Shane Watson bat when website members visited the GM  (Read 13787 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Kulli

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5409
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Herr Kaleun
Re: Did anyone see a Shane Watson bat when website members visited the GM
« Reply #30 on: January 20, 2011, 01:49:56 PM »
Be interesting to see the difference.
Logged
They won't catch us this time! Not this time! They haven't spotted us! No, they're all snoring in their bunks! Or, you know what? They're drinking at the bar, celebrating our sinking! Not yet, my friends. Not yet!

uknsaunders

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8656
  • Trade Count: (+4)
    • Farmers CC
Re: Did anyone see a Shane Watson bat when website members visited the GM
« Reply #31 on: January 20, 2011, 02:07:55 PM »
Got a CA Gel - 2'7.5 (with 2 grips) and 40mm edges. It will give you an advantage and you can't see the join without very close inspection. If it wasn't for the Gel stickers, you probably wouldn't even recognise it.
Logged
email and googletalk: uknsaunders@gmail.com
club website: http://www.farmerscricketjersey.net/

justnotcricket86

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4071
  • Trade Count: (+4)
Re: Did anyone see a Shane Watson bat when website members visited the GM
« Reply #32 on: January 20, 2011, 02:08:22 PM »
Quote from: 100 not out on January 20, 2011, 01:41:54 PM
then there are the other type of laminates, where you cannot see the join,they look "normal" in size - it is literall a very thin sheet of willow cleft stuck to the face of a bat. very very hard to tell these. these are laminated for performance. i have a few pics will upload at some point.

Would be interested to see those pics, don't know much about laminated bats other they are a bit 'del boy'

Stick them in a new thread if you can mate
Logged
The minute you hesitate, you're in trouble - Steve Waugh

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: Did anyone see a Shane Watson bat when website members visited the GM
« Reply #33 on: January 20, 2011, 02:17:18 PM »
Look at mine in the for sale section under special talisman lam pics of one of these types of lam there
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

100 not out

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2244
  • Trade Count: (+11)
Re: Did anyone see a Shane Watson bat when website members visited the GM
« Reply #34 on: January 20, 2011, 02:18:28 PM »
where is the join on your CA.

how thick are the two pieces joined together.

i bet they wont be 2/3 mm thick.
Logged

justnotcricket86

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4071
  • Trade Count: (+4)
Re: Did anyone see a Shane Watson bat when website members visited the GM
« Reply #35 on: January 20, 2011, 02:19:57 PM »
Quote from: roco on January 20, 2011, 02:17:18 PM
Look at mine in the for sale section under special talisman lam pics of one of these types of lam there

Can't seem to find the post roco
Logged
The minute you hesitate, you're in trouble - Steve Waugh

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: Did anyone see a Shane Watson bat when website members visited the GM
« Reply #36 on: January 20, 2011, 02:22:24 PM »
2nd page 5th up from bottom in the for sale section it's a performance lam made by Tom keeley for use at test level
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

justnotcricket86

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4071
  • Trade Count: (+4)
Re: Did anyone see a Shane Watson bat when website members visited the GM
« Reply #37 on: January 20, 2011, 02:33:35 PM »
Oh right found it.

So Newbery have effectively made an illegal bat for a test player, is that right?
Logged
The minute you hesitate, you're in trouble - Steve Waugh

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: Did anyone see a Shane Watson bat when website members visited the GM
« Reply #38 on: January 20, 2011, 02:37:32 PM »
If that's the way you look at it but tim is an independent bat maker who makes for newbery I think
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

100 not out

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2244
  • Trade Count: (+11)
Re: Did anyone see a Shane Watson bat when website members visited the GM
« Reply #39 on: January 20, 2011, 02:38:38 PM »
can of worms
Logged

justnotcricket86

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4071
  • Trade Count: (+4)
Re: Did anyone see a Shane Watson bat when website members visited the GM
« Reply #40 on: January 20, 2011, 02:43:18 PM »
No skin off my nose mate, but I see what you mean. Why are they frowned upon then? I have not read much about the subject to be honest
Logged
The minute you hesitate, you're in trouble - Steve Waugh

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: Did anyone see a Shane Watson bat when website members visited the GM
« Reply #41 on: January 20, 2011, 02:45:30 PM »
Well from what I have been told at least 5 top internationals use them but it gives an unfair advantage to the batsmen I suppose
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

Colesy

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7677
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • I hate losing more than I even wanna win.
Re: Did anyone see a Shane Watson bat when website members visited the GM
« Reply #42 on: January 20, 2011, 02:48:57 PM »
It is cheating
Logged
High scores: 255, 124, 114              Best figures: 5-19, 5-24, 5-26

justnotcricket86

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4071
  • Trade Count: (+4)
Re: Did anyone see a Shane Watson bat when website members visited the GM
« Reply #43 on: January 20, 2011, 02:51:11 PM »
How is it cheating then? What advantages do you get from using a laminated bad?

Excuse my ignorance chaps
Logged
The minute you hesitate, you're in trouble - Steve Waugh

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: Did anyone see a Shane Watson bat when website members visited the GM
« Reply #44 on: January 20, 2011, 02:54:34 PM »
It is cheating as they are banned

I think the theory was 25% more power but don't quote me
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 7
« previous next »
 

Advertise on CBF