Advertise on CBF

Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: James Franklin  (Read 3113 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

espocrespo

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1606
  • Trade Count: (+3)
James Franklin
« on: February 01, 2011, 06:51:59 PM »

Saw franklins bat on tv what a log! It's massive
Logged

mattw

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 2259
  • Trade Count: (+9)
    • PRYZM Cricket
Re: James Franklin
« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2011, 06:58:59 PM »

yeah I saw this as well, possible laminate?
Logged

Tom

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5607
  • Trade Count: (+33)
    • www.cricketinsight.co.uk
Re: James Franklin
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2011, 08:13:09 PM »

Not that big, considering their stock stickers and stamp don't look dwarfed.

The angle accentuates it more too.

Logged

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: James Franklin
« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2011, 08:18:09 PM »

Tv adds weight as they say ha
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

Cover_Drive

  • Moderator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5698
  • Trade Count: (+14)
Re: James Franklin
« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2011, 10:50:02 PM »

It looks big to be honest. I was watching the game and it did look massive for its weight..
Logged
Twitter: @_UzairM

19reading87

  • Moderator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 7079
  • Trade Count: (+39)
Re: James Franklin
« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2011, 11:34:24 PM »

Off subject of the bat, is this guy perhaps the most improved cricketer in the world currently?
Logged
Highest score: 147*          Best bowling: 6-20

100 not out

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2244
  • Trade Count: (+11)
Re: James Franklin
« Reply #6 on: February 04, 2011, 11:40:24 PM »

That is a rather bold statement. We shall see in the world cup.
Logged

Jeet

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1082
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: James Franklin
« Reply #7 on: February 05, 2011, 12:09:43 AM »

Off subject of the bat, is this guy perhaps the most improved cricketer in the world currently?
He's gone from being a useful swing bowler, into a batting all rounder. Top effort by Franklin to have the hunger to develop his game.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2011, 12:16:02 AM by Jeet »
Logged
"Commit all your crimes when Sachin is batting", "They will go unnoticed because even the Lord is watching".

Cover_Drive

  • Moderator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5698
  • Trade Count: (+14)
Re: James Franklin
« Reply #8 on: February 05, 2011, 01:57:56 AM »

Off subject of the bat, is this guy perhaps the most improved cricketer in the world currently?

One of the most improved player in cricket I have seen is Hashim Amla, when he started he wasn't that good but now he is like Bradman of South Africa LOL
Logged
Twitter: @_UzairM

Tumo

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1721
  • Trade Count: (+4)
Re: James Franklin
« Reply #9 on: February 05, 2011, 07:50:12 AM »

He's gone from being a useful swing bowler, into a batting all rounder. Top effort by Franklin to have the hunger to develop his game.
He has most definitely improved his game, especially on the batting side of things!

niceonechoppy

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2541
  • Trade Count: (+9)
Re: James Franklin
« Reply #10 on: February 05, 2011, 10:47:19 AM »

It looks big to be honest. I was watching the game and it did look massive for its weight..
What's the weight then?
Logged
Form is temporary, class is permanent.

petehosk

  • Administrator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8816
  • Trade Count: (+39)
Re: James Franklin
« Reply #11 on: February 05, 2011, 11:08:06 AM »

Well, I have one of his and it is around 2'9 in weight and is pretty large....I would say edges are 35-40mm.
Can't find the digital scales so only using older less accurate ones!
Logged

19reading87

  • Moderator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 7079
  • Trade Count: (+39)
Re: James Franklin
« Reply #12 on: February 05, 2011, 01:45:48 PM »

Ow Mr hosk I love how you have so many bats lol
Logged
Highest score: 147*          Best bowling: 6-20

petehosk

  • Administrator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8816
  • Trade Count: (+39)
Re: James Franklin
« Reply #13 on: February 05, 2011, 01:52:52 PM »





Logged

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: James Franklin
« Reply #14 on: February 05, 2011, 01:59:49 PM »

Oh pete you are a tease
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.
Pages: [1] 2
 

Advertise on CBF