Prettiest number of grains
Advertise on CBF
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4

Author Topic: Prettiest number of grains  (Read 6416 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Talisman

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 603
  • Trade Count: (+76)
Re: Prettiest number of grains
« Reply #30 on: April 08, 2011, 06:05:38 PM »
Heartwood is more brittle, not harder.
Logged

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: Prettiest number of grains
« Reply #31 on: April 08, 2011, 06:07:20 PM »
There no known evidence that heartwood increases performance

(No Swearing Please) i need to leave the forum my mind is working over time to much time reading about willow and stuff.

Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"

ProWannabe88

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3293
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Re: Prettiest number of grains
« Reply #32 on: April 08, 2011, 06:07:40 PM »
Ah right. Thanks mike
Logged
To stay in, You've got to not get out! High score 242* Bowling 7-23

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: Prettiest number of grains
« Reply #33 on: April 08, 2011, 06:09:32 PM »
And are we saying that tight grains is a 100 per cent fool proof way of judging a way a bat will play
Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"

Howzat

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5509
  • Trade Count: (+7)
Re: Prettiest number of grains
« Reply #34 on: April 08, 2011, 06:12:14 PM »
Quote from: Talisman on April 08, 2011, 05:42:50 PM
Leo are you a grumpy old man in secret???
Just that it reminds me of a kashmir part made that I had... 25 grains 3/4 heartwood!
Logged
Top Scores: 171,112,100,99,86*,74*  Best Bowling: 5/18

Cover_Drive

  • Moderator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5698
  • Trade Count: (+14)
Re: Prettiest number of grains
« Reply #35 on: April 08, 2011, 06:20:29 PM »
8-13, no heartwood, if there is any then it should be a small strip on outer edge (preferably)
Logged
Twitter: @_UzairM

Talisman

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 603
  • Trade Count: (+76)
Re: Prettiest number of grains
« Reply #36 on: April 08, 2011, 06:26:29 PM »
Quote from: procricket on April 08, 2011, 06:09:32 PM
And are we saying that tight grains is a 100 per cent fool proof way of judging a way a bat will play

No, it is not 100% but it is a very good indicator if all the other aspects are equal, it can be pressed wrong just like 6 grains so as long as you get more components done well you increase the chances of a great bat.

One thing worth bearing in mind when someone who sells bats for a living tells you that "x" is the best number of grains is that "x" is almost certainly what they will have lots of in their workshop. If I had 1000 clefts with 8/9 grains and 1000 with 20+ grains I know which would be sought after. The trouble is that market pressure on the growers leads to them planting where the tree will grow fastest and give them a greater yield and thus profit. I would think most trees these days are harvested in 15 years and so 7 grains is going to be standard numbers wise.
Logged

Perkins17

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 856
  • Trade Count: (+2)
    • GM Cricket
Re: Prettiest number of grains
« Reply #37 on: April 08, 2011, 06:34:11 PM »
has to be around 8-9 grains with a nice butterfly stain near the toe :D
Logged

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: Prettiest number of grains
« Reply #38 on: April 08, 2011, 06:37:12 PM »
You and your butterfly stains
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

Perkins17

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 856
  • Trade Count: (+2)
    • GM Cricket
Re: Prettiest number of grains
« Reply #39 on: April 08, 2011, 06:42:15 PM »
:D
Logged

Watsontotty

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2454
  • Trade Count: (+11)
Re: Prettiest number of grains
« Reply #40 on: April 08, 2011, 07:41:45 PM »
9 is what i like and never found any more gives a better performance than my bats with 9, lots of stuff regarding this and in my opinion no evidence bats with more grains will play any better than a bat with a few less. Ive had some bats with 15 grains and more but they haven't been any better than bats with 8 or 9.
Logged

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: Prettiest number of grains
« Reply #41 on: April 08, 2011, 07:43:24 PM »
Quote from: Watsontotty on April 08, 2011, 07:41:45 PM
9 is what i like and never found any more gives a better performance than my bats with 9, lots of stuff regarding this and in my opinion no evidence bats with more grains will play any better than a bat with a few less. Ive had some bats with 15 grains and more but they haven't been any better than bats with 8 or 9.

Rich i agree 100 per cent
Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"

Talisman

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 603
  • Trade Count: (+76)
Re: Prettiest number of grains
« Reply #42 on: April 08, 2011, 08:03:53 PM »
Ahh but you 2 haven't spent £300k like others have.... they found direct correlation between grains and performance.
Logged

procricket

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14521
  • Trade Count: (+33)
Re: Prettiest number of grains
« Reply #43 on: April 08, 2011, 08:05:01 PM »
Oh mike i have mate i had a 29 grain beast performance was good but not the best i have had.

Funny if they were the best why do not most pro not  use 25 grain bats

I have had 4 bats in my life all over 20 grains one was a peach the other 3 were good nothing special

And 2 of them were pressed at the best place according to most people
« Last Edit: April 08, 2011, 08:17:33 PM by procricket »
Logged
"Doubt whoever but never doubt yourself"

Watsontotty

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2454
  • Trade Count: (+11)
Re: Prettiest number of grains
« Reply #44 on: April 08, 2011, 08:19:08 PM »
Quote from: Talisman on April 08, 2011, 08:03:53 PM
Ahh but you 2 haven't spent £300k like others have.... they found direct correlation between grains and performance.

Fortunately many makers would disagree with your comments Mike and they have spent a fair bit more than 300k, some will agree with you while others disagree so unfortunately its an argument which cant be won either way. I have my opinions and you have yours and i believe certain people see multiple grains as an opportunity to ramp the price up and use it purely as a marketing tool. I have around 10 bats at the minute all with different number of grains from 15 down to 9 and if I'm honest very little difference at all between them.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
« previous next »
 

Advertise on CBF