What if Stewart hadn't kept wickets? He could (woulda, shoulda...) have averaged mid-40s at least. Two hundreds in Bridgetown...
Now thats an interesting one - the guy had wonderful talent as an opening bat, supreme timing and decent technique. He was also, crucially, an excellent player of fast bowling.
Indeed, one wonders with the modern attitude to consistency of selection, planning etc, just how mucg better that mid-90s England side could have been - Stewart without the gloves (if they wouldn't stick with Russell, how about Blakey with?), Smith given support rather than brickbats, Atheron given proper medical care, the likes of Maynard and Morris encouraged to be individuals...
...the bowling attack would still have been (No Swearing Please) mind you!