Big Bash #2
Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6

Author Topic: Big Bash #2  (Read 11387 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

The_Bird

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2977
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Big Bash #2
« Reply #15 on: December 09, 2012, 10:28:41 AM »

Theo Doropoulos..!!

What a name for a cricketer
Logged

The_Bird

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2977
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Big Bash #2
« Reply #16 on: December 09, 2012, 10:59:32 AM »

Anyone know what voges is using? Gloves look a bit blue room but I can't make out the bat.

« Last Edit: December 09, 2012, 11:05:12 AM by The_Bird »
Logged

Bruce

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1765
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Re: Big Bash #2
« Reply #17 on: December 09, 2012, 09:15:27 PM »

Watsons straight 6 is the best shot I have seen all year
Logged
You're only as good as your last knock....

Nickauger

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3521
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: Big Bash #2
« Reply #18 on: December 09, 2012, 09:32:03 PM »

Watsons straight 6 is the best shot I have seen all year

Is there a link to it?
Logged

i12breakfree

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2291
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Big Bash #2
« Reply #19 on: December 10, 2012, 03:48:27 AM »

Cool LED stuff
Logged

tugga

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 138
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Big Bash #2
« Reply #20 on: December 10, 2012, 07:14:33 AM »

Anyone know what voges is using? Gloves look a bit blue room but I can't make out the bat.




Grove Bats, exclusive to Muelemans I think.

http://www.meulemans.com.au/l199/grove
Logged

The_Bird

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2977
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Big Bash #2
« Reply #21 on: December 12, 2012, 06:50:29 PM »

Anyone see Malinga today? 6 for 7 haha
Logged

jimba101

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1695
  • Trade Count: (+10)
Re: Big Bash #2
« Reply #22 on: December 12, 2012, 08:41:34 PM »

Anyone see Malinga today? 6 for 7 haha

Yeah, awesome spell. Bowlers looked to get quite abit of assistance from the pitch though
Logged

uknsaunders

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8656
  • Trade Count: (+4)
    • Farmers CC
Re: Big Bash #2
« Reply #23 on: December 13, 2012, 06:12:56 PM »

who likes a bit of D/L?

BBL blushes after controversial Stars win

Melbourne Stars were controversially declared winners by D/L method after batting for only 2.1 overs © Getty Images

Matches: Perth Scorchers v Melbourne Stars at Perth

Big Bash League officials were forced to clarify the match result from Wednesday night's second round clash at the WACA after confusion clouded the Melbourne Stars 10-wicket win under the Duckworth/Lewis method over the Perth Scorchers.

"The KFC T20 Big Bash League has received a lot of enquiries and there's been much interest in how the outcome of last night's match between the Scorchers and Stars was reached and we'd like to address any confusion," BBL's Mike McKenna said. "We have spent today briefing many stakeholders about the result and the rules surrounding rain-affected matches."

One of those stakeholders was Scorchers coach Justin Langer, who had earlier flagged a discussion with BBL officials. "The result was probably fair because we played so poorly. But at the end of the day the process was unusual," Langer said. "We will be taking it up with Cricket Australia, the process side of it. It was a bit of a farce in the end."

WACA chief executive Christina Matthews wrote to Cricket Australia on behalf of the Scorchers side, as did Paul Marsh, CEO of the Australian Cricketers Association.

The match finished in extraordinary circumstances. The Stars were 0 for 29 after just two overs in pursuit of the Scorchers' record-low score of 69 when heavy rain halted play at 6.39 pm local time. As was explained by the umpires on the night, the BBL statement confirmed that another three overs of play were required to constitute a match. Play needed to resume at 7.51pm local time for those three overs to be bowled in time.

The rain stopped, as if by royal decree from Stars captain, spin king, Shane Warne. The umpires completed a field inspection at 7.35pm, deemed it fit for play, and rescheduled the match to start at 7.51pm. Both teams were notified. One Scorchers squad member suggested post-match that there was "no way the field was fit for play."

Under the Duckworth/Lewis method the target for the Stars was recalculated. The calculation, which itself has been disputed, ensured that the Stars required just six runs from five overs. Even though the Stars had already reached and exceeded the target, given the D/L target had changed when overs were lost play needed to resume to set the revised target

Play resumed at 7.52pm after a minor delay. Hilton Cartwright bowled one ball to Rob Quiney, who allowed it to pass through to the keeper, and the match was over as the Stars had reached their revised target after 2.1 overs.

The BBL statement referred to clause 12.6.2 b (iii) of the playing conditions, "To constitute a match, a minimum of 5 overs have to be bowled to the team batting second subject to a result not being achieved earlier." League officials were adamant the correct processes had been followed.

Despite the official clarification reports emerged that coaches and players from elsewhere in the BBL were unhappy with the result given the importance of Warne, and the Stars, to the competition's success.
Logged
email and googletalk: uknsaunders@gmail.com
club website: http://www.farmerscricketjersey.net/

Nickauger

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3521
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: Big Bash #2
« Reply #24 on: December 13, 2012, 06:35:58 PM »

I don't see the problem, surely the target had been reduced to a 6 over target, and the 6 over target was 29, they just had to play one ball and they had won. Surely if the 6 over target had been 31 then no problem!
Logged

The_Bird

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2977
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Big Bash #2
« Reply #25 on: December 13, 2012, 06:37:28 PM »

Crazy game today, stunning catches, huge sixes! Top stuff
Logged

charlie15

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 826
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Can't bat, can't bowl, but love the game
    • W&HCC
Re: Big Bash #2
« Reply #26 on: December 13, 2012, 07:39:52 PM »

Crazy game today, stunning catches, huge sixes! Top stuff

I tuned in for the last 10 or so overs, it was one hell of a match in which the likely winner changed each over!
Logged

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: Big Bash #2
« Reply #27 on: December 15, 2012, 08:41:22 AM »

Must say I'm loving today's match with warne commentating on own bowling even commenting on how he's seen the batsmen tapping bat hard wanting to play shot so he'll pause at top of run to make him tap a few more times which he dually obliges

Plus calling what he's going to bowl then doing it
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

ManHOOS

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 253
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Big Bash #2
« Reply #28 on: January 06, 2013, 12:13:50 PM »

Very ugly incident in today's Big Bash match

Samuels gone mad lol, had that bat hit Warne he would end up in Hospital.

What was Samuels thinking ?

http://www.bigbash.com.au/news-and-videos/2013/01/06/mels-v-melr-warne-v-samuels

 Sportsman spirit eh............... :-[
Logged

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: Big Bash #2
« Reply #29 on: January 06, 2013, 12:17:21 PM »

Warner was just as bad grabbing Samuels telling him to F off a couple of times and throwing ball at Samuels

Bit of spice
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6
 

Advertise on CBF