Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 11

Author Topic: James Anderson vs Mitchell Johnson  (Read 23889 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Johng

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 399
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: James Anderson vs Mitchell Johnson
« Reply #105 on: December 08, 2013, 10:16:43 AM »

Anderson averages 30 for a reason.
Logged

FattusCattus

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9714
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Bend it like Fattus!!
Re: James Anderson vs Mitchell Johnson
« Reply #106 on: December 08, 2013, 10:40:21 AM »

Very profound.

 Are we supposed to guess what you feel the reason is, or are you being mysterious and enigmatic?
Logged
If you tolerate this, then your baked goods will be next.

Johng

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 399
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: James Anderson vs Mitchell Johnson
« Reply #107 on: December 08, 2013, 10:43:58 AM »

Your average is usually a picture of how you have performed over your total career, at times Anderson has been world class and at times he has been ordinary when you put all that together he averages 30. I hope this helps!! ;)
Logged

joeljonno

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2661
  • Trade Count: (+8)
Re: James Anderson vs Mitchell Johnson
« Reply #108 on: December 08, 2013, 12:21:35 PM »

Well, what about Shane Warne?

He was one of the best spinners in the world, his average reflects that. However, he only played Zimbabwe and Bangladesh minimal times, didn't he.

Therefore his average would be better if he did.

Stats only show so much.

Doesn't Finn average 50 at 3 for England?  Must mean he's the best number 3 England have?
Logged
Twitter - @joeljonno

WalkingWicket37

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12983
  • Trade Count: (+26)
Re: James Anderson vs Mitchell Johnson
« Reply #109 on: December 08, 2013, 12:27:14 PM »

Doesn't Finn average 50 at 3 for England?  Must mean he's the best number 3 England have?
I've been saying this for months, thought he was a certainty to replicate Trott (and he could bowl a couple of overs if needed)  ;)
Logged

Johng

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 399
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: James Anderson vs Mitchell Johnson
« Reply #110 on: December 08, 2013, 12:59:09 PM »

700 wickets @25 is awful for a spinner. Warne's average was 47 against India so would of been a lot lower. The latter part of Anderson's career has been fantastic but early on he was very average I bet now he wished he met David Saker a touch earlier as no doubt his average would been mid 20's. Chin up boy's 3 more tests to go ;)






Logged

awp

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 549
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: James Anderson vs Mitchell Johnson
« Reply #111 on: December 08, 2013, 01:32:24 PM »

Anderson is these days very highly skilled but has always been soft.  When things dont go his way hes always dropped his head, and pace. Not a lot in the guts department, never been any different.   
Logged

mk_chappo

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 151
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: James Anderson vs Mitchell Johnson
« Reply #112 on: December 08, 2013, 01:55:04 PM »

Not saying he should be dropped but he's 31, showing signs of age .. England should have already identified his replacement and be given them game time when against the crap of world cricket
I agree. Don't think its time for Anderson to go but we need to be looking at where his replacement will come from. At the moment it's Finn, Rankin & Tremlett. Tall, fast-meduium, hit the deck bowlers. Who else is in the pipeline?
Logged

Johng

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 399
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: James Anderson vs Mitchell Johnson
« Reply #113 on: December 08, 2013, 01:55:51 PM »

Anderson is these days very highly skilled but has always been soft.  When things dont go his way hes always dropped his head, and pace. Not a lot in the guts department, never been any different.
Yep!!
Logged

Gerry SA

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1301
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Voice of the Voiceless
Re: James Anderson vs Mitchell Johnson
« Reply #114 on: December 08, 2013, 06:20:43 PM »

700 wickets @25 is awful for a spinner. Warne's average was 47 against India so would of been a lot lower. The latter part of Anderson's career has been fantastic but early on he was very average I bet now he wished he met David Saker a touch earlier as no doubt his average would been mid 20's. Chin up boy's 3 more tests to go ;)
Highly unlikely.

Anderson is one dimensional. If it swings he looks almost great. If it doesn't he looks mediocre.
Logged
"You should never get nervous about anything. What today seems important tomorrow isn't so any more."
Tito Vilanova (17 September 1968 - 25 April 2014)

Buzz

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12714
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Clear your mind, stay still and watch the ball
Re: James Anderson vs Mitchell Johnson
« Reply #115 on: December 08, 2013, 06:35:54 PM »

bowlers look a lot better when the batsmen have scored 450+ runs.

our batters haven't dome that in a long while.

accusing Anderson of a lack of guts is ridiculous
Logged
"Bradman didn't used to have any trigger movements or anything like that. He turned batting into a subconscious act" Tony Shillinglaw.

joeljonno

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2661
  • Trade Count: (+8)
Re: James Anderson vs Mitchell Johnson
« Reply #116 on: December 08, 2013, 07:37:43 PM »

bowlers look a lot better when the batsmen have scored 450+ runs.

our batters haven't dome that in a long while

England have surpassed 450 on this tour already. Yes it took 4 innings and 30-odd batsmen,but they've scored more.  Oh, you mean in one innings, sorry. Yeah, no. 
Logged
Twitter - @joeljonno

deanoknight

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1282
  • Trade Count: (+7)
Re: James Anderson vs Mitchell Johnson
« Reply #117 on: December 08, 2013, 07:52:10 PM »

some people have short memories on here.... Anderson is are front line bowler for a reason, form is temporary and class is permanent 
Logged

Tail Ender

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 420
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: James Anderson vs Mitchell Johnson
« Reply #118 on: December 09, 2013, 04:12:11 AM »

Anderson looks exhausted. He (and Broad) struggled to hit 130kph in Adelaide, and looks like he's in need of a rest. Not going to happen with day one in Perth on Friday.
Logged
"Cricket was my reason for living" - Harold Larwood

awp

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 549
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: James Anderson vs Mitchell Johnson
« Reply #119 on: December 15, 2013, 01:19:04 PM »

bowlers look a lot better when the batsmen have scored 450+ runs.

our batters haven't dome that in a long while.

accusing Anderson of a lack of guts is ridiculous
Probably,  yes, too harsh and unfair.  I do maintain he 'paces' himself if conditions or match situation dont suit his liking.  However, having watched him closely in Perth, he's clearly tired.  Its when fast bowlers get injured too, playing when in need of a rest.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 11
 

Advertise on CBF