counterintuitive maybe, but right. Think about it - even when Australia and South Africa were sharing 860, it was never that entertaining because the ball was little more than a golf ball on a tee for John Daly to hit and sixes get boring after a while if you know that the bowler has little hope, however skilfully he may bowl, of preventing them. The best and most exciting one dayers are the ones where sixes elicit a gasp, good bowlers are played out and 100 is a matchwinning innings rather than a tardy strike rate.
OK I agree, but take away the leg side wide rule, and if a team gets too close to winning 'hell, we'll just throw it down the leg side and pack the leg side field'. No fielding restrictions, 'we'll just put every-one on the boundary and stop you from scoring'. No restrictions on bowlers, 'we'll pick 8 batsman and 3 bowlers, then it won't matter if we lose a hat full of wickets'
The answer is to spice up the pitches, not change the rules!