Hi Edward, about this, have your drying techniques changed allowed for a bigger bat that you used to be able to make in 2007? I was having a think about this, and thought that perhaps you could beef up the edges to around the 30mm mark, still have the non-concaved back and the profile of the Purist, and maybe make it a limited run? Of course, this would probably have to be made in Players grade willow, but if you can get the Trott Icon to be that big without concaving, surely the Purist wouldn't be impossible? I know I'm probably just thinking in a fantasy world of mine, probably because a Purist 303 was my very first bat, but I'm just curious if it could be done. I completely understand the reasoning behind the traditionally shaped Purist not being brought back, even Newbery have apparently changed their Mjolnir profile for this year, (for a thicker edged profile) probably because thick edges sell bats.
I think GM have done a great job, maybe a little too much information, but I'm a bit of a cricket bat geek and I like info like this, and if the majority of your customers buy online, then why not give them as much information as you can? I'm warming to the Zona style stickers too, I think it's just the profile that wasn't quite to my liking.
I do have a question about the weight differences for a bigger edge, is this because you press the flat faced bats a little harder? I would have thought that if you pressed them with the same force for the flatter face ones, which would mean the edges wouldn't be as compressed but the middle would be just as compressed, which means that you still get the bat at the same weight, just with a thicker edge. Perhaps it's the profile shaping that's slightly different on the CNC, but surely you would get around a 5mm thicker edge from the F2 face compared to the F7 face. I'm just guessing here though...
Top questions!
In terms of drying, we only put willow into production when it reaches a specific moisture content. As part of the DXM investment we fundamentally changed how we season and condition the timber, which is much more effective, but the moisture content criteria has not changed. This is an important point - a company can dry out a piece of timber more so that it will be lighter (moisture = weight), and then produce a bat that appears to be big and light. However, it will not be durable and is not something that we will do.
Absolute top end willow is getting increasingly difficult to source - this will affect the whole industry in due course. In a way the bat you are talking about is a slightly bigger 1885 so yes it can be done, we would need to run the numbers to see what sort of weights would be produced.
Thanks for your comments about info on the website - across our businesses, we feel that our customers are after more and more information, so we try to provide it. The bat spectrum shows at a glance details about our entire bat range. The height of the bat on the graph shows where the swell is, the rest of the info shows dimensions etc - we are pleased with how this is developing - it has now been updated for 2014 :
http://www.gm-cricket.com/pages/bat-spectrum.aspxPressing - there seems to be some confusion on this very important point.
We achieve the different face curvatures by machining, not by pressing. When the clefts are then pressed, we use the same pressures on the different faces. The vital point here is that we will only use the correct roller for the specific face curvature - so we have three different sets of tooling for F7, F4.5 & F2. Sadly, many manufacturers only use one roller profile irrespective of the specific shape they are pressing. This leads to incomplete contact between roller and willow, variable pressure applied across the face of the bat, and inconsistency in use as a natural consequence of less than rigorous manufacturing processes.
We don't do that at GM Nottingham.
Kind regards
Edward