Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 32

Author Topic: The pink test (Sydney)  (Read 102453 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Wooly

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 164
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The pink test (Sydney)
« Reply #210 on: January 03, 2014, 09:50:15 PM »

Thank you for agreeing with us.

Add Wooly to the list of Aussie haters.

 :D :D :D

you guys don't really hate Aussies, only when we are smacking your backsides.  Probably the same way we feel about you blokes.  ;)
Logged

joeljonno

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2661
  • Trade Count: (+8)
Re: The pink test (Sydney)
« Reply #211 on: January 03, 2014, 09:51:10 PM »

I agree it causes offence, especially from someone who is just not good enough which makes it more offensive.

It doesn't have to be offensive, just clever.
Logged
Twitter - @joeljonno

Overdrive

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 68
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The pink test (Sydney)
« Reply #212 on: January 03, 2014, 09:53:14 PM »

I agree it causes offence, especially from someone who is just not good enough which makes it more offensive.

Who cares who delivers it...its a team tactic. On the video i just posted, in the first 10 seconds Merv tells us that it is a team tactic amongst the Australians which they call 'verbal intimidation'.
Logged

ProCricketer1982

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7432
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The pink test (Sydney)
« Reply #213 on: January 03, 2014, 09:54:01 PM »

I agree it causes offence, especially from someone who is just not good enough which makes it more offensive.

What makes someone good enough to sledge?

Is Anderson able to sledge Warne? Maybe Haddin to sledge gilly? Not sure you can say 'isn't good enough' because where is that line. If you play amateur cricket I'd say you certainly aren't good enough. I'd also say half or more of the county circuit probably aren't either :(


Clever/amusing sledging (to fielders, batsmen and umpires!!) is great, unfortunately 99% of it is offensive and not clever
Logged

joeljonno

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2661
  • Trade Count: (+8)
Re: The pink test (Sydney)
« Reply #214 on: January 03, 2014, 09:54:21 PM »

you guys don't really hate Aussies, only when we are smacking your backsides.  Probably the same way we feel about you blokes.  ;)

To be fair, personally I really like the Aussies and 99.99% are ok. It is the odd one who use success to deliberately wind up people without having anything to back it up. Almost using other peoples success to mask his own failing in whatever they do.

I would guess it is mirrored in with the English attitude. One person will ruin it for the rest of them.
Logged
Twitter - @joeljonno

Steveo1000

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 388
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: The pink test (Sydney)
« Reply #215 on: January 03, 2014, 09:56:15 PM »

It doesn't have to be offensive, just clever.
My point exactly. From someone who is not good enough it becomes offensive. From someone who is good enough and has respect it can be clever and affective.
Logged

Steveo1000

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 388
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: The pink test (Sydney)
« Reply #216 on: January 03, 2014, 10:01:33 PM »

What makes someone good enough to sledge?

Is Anderson able to sledge Warne? Maybe Haddin to sledge gilly? Not sure you can say 'isn't good enough' because where is that line. If you play amateur cricket I'd say you certainly aren't good enough. I'd also say half or more of the county circuit probably aren't either :(


Clever/amusing sledging (to fielders, batsmen and umpires!!) is great, unfortunately 99% of it is offensive and not clever
It's All relative surely, so it doesn't matter what level you play at. At any level of cricket, the crap bloke who chirps up and can't back it up gets hammered by the opposition. That's just the way it goes mate.
Logged

joeljonno

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2661
  • Trade Count: (+8)
Re: The pink test (Sydney)
« Reply #217 on: January 03, 2014, 10:01:54 PM »

My point exactly. From someone who is not good enough it becomes offensive. From someone who is good enough and has respect it can be clever and affective.

Clarke threatened a number 11 batsman with the potential of a broken arm. That is not clever, just intimidatory.

Clarke is probably the best batsman on show in the series.

How is that any more worthy than if Bailey had said it?
Logged
Twitter - @joeljonno

Overdrive

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 68
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The pink test (Sydney)
« Reply #218 on: January 03, 2014, 10:03:22 PM »

Clarke threatened a number 11 batsman with the potential of a broken arm. That is not clever, just intimidatory.

Clarke is probably the best batsman on show in the series.

How is that any more worthy than if Bailey had said it?

See post above re: Verbal intimidation
Logged

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6752
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: The pink test (Sydney)
« Reply #219 on: January 03, 2014, 10:04:40 PM »

It is the odd one who use success to deliberately wind up people without having anything to back it up.

This.  Anyone else wonder why Johnson is giving it the big I am all of a sudden after years of being a laughing stock?
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

Steveo1000

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 388
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: The pink test (Sydney)
« Reply #220 on: January 03, 2014, 10:04:59 PM »

Clarke threatened a number 11 batsman with the potential of a broken arm. That is not clever, just intimidatory.

Clarke is probably the best batsman on show in the series.

How is that any more worthy than if Bailey had said it?
I did say can be clever and affective. That example is completely unacceptable and should have resulted in ban. In my opinion.
Logged

Steveo1000

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 388
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: The pink test (Sydney)
« Reply #221 on: January 03, 2014, 10:06:52 PM »

Not very good with the bold type lol
Logged

Overdrive

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 68
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The pink test (Sydney)
« Reply #222 on: January 03, 2014, 10:10:03 PM »

This.  Anyone else wonder why Johnson is giving it the big I am all of a sudden after years of being a laughing stock?

He seems to think that your only as good as your last match...in which case he is a magnificent (No Swearing Please).
Logged

joeljonno

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2661
  • Trade Count: (+8)
Re: The pink test (Sydney)
« Reply #223 on: January 03, 2014, 10:15:21 PM »

I did say can be clever and affective. That example is completely unacceptable and should have resulted in ban. In my opinion.

But the point is, why does it matter who says it?

A better example would be McGrath/Brandes and Brandes quick riposte to a McGrath sledge. Brandes is not good enough a cricketer to give it to McGrath, yet he does and it is clever,so it is right.

If it is clever enough, no matter how good you are, sledging is fine.

If it is blantantly disrespectful,doesn't matter if you are the best player in the World, shouldn't be allowed.

(apologies, just realised, possibly not the most thoughtful of choices being the Sydney "pink" test. Sorry for any upset).
Logged
Twitter - @joeljonno

Steveo1000

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 388
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: The pink test (Sydney)
« Reply #224 on: January 03, 2014, 10:25:22 PM »

But the point is, why does it matter who says it?

A better example would be McGrath/Brandes and Brandes quick riposte to a McGrath sledge. Brandes is not good enough a cricketer to give it to McGrath, yet he does and it is clever,so it is right.

If it is clever enough, no matter how good you are, sledging is fine.

If it is blantantly disrespectful,doesn't matter if you are the best player in the World, shouldn't be allowed.

(apologies, just realised, possibly not the most thoughtful of choices being the Sydney "pink" test. Sorry for any upset).
In principle clever sledging (Let's ignore the Clarke example) is fine from anyone. All I'm saying is that in my opinion sledging has to be backed up with something, otherwise you end up looking like a bit of a tit.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 32
 

Advertise on CBF