South Africa aren't gonna play 5 batsmen and their keeper and 5 fast bowlers. Makes no sense whatsoever. If you play 5 front line fast bowlers, one will be underused. That said the bowlers with the best FC record at the Wanderers are Viljoen, Morris, Abbott and Rabada. But would South Africa consider leaving out Morkel, when Steyn and Philander are already missing? Very unlikely. Duminy will come in the little Bavuma might be forced into opening
I think Gary at 3 adds more balance to the line up.
Can't see it being a prepared (on purpose) seamers wicket. Taking an almighty risk with 2 guys with 700+ test wickets and another with a strike rate under 50, against an attack with a half dozen caps between 3 seamers. More likely a hard bouncy but essentially true deck, which SA hope will exploit Englands supposed weakness at altitude.
Looks like de Kock will move up to open to accommodate Duminy. Imagine if England bat for 120/150 overs, de Kock will be knackered
Going off what Morris did last game you could aruge he's a pretty good number 7 in his own right and saffas love de cock's biffing. Morkal is apparently 'in the red' for the fitness gurus so is due a rest. Still, from a England POV.. hope they play Dummy and promote titch up to opening as that should suit the England bowlers down to the group.. rabbit up top and a weak minded bloke at 6.. win winif SA are producing a seamers wicket.. why not go all out in the hope of smashing through englands not overly good batting line up and aiming for a bowler dominated low scoring game?EEYORE
what a dumb idea... good for England though.. He'll flash and get out anyway so the higher up he is the better for England. Sure let him open
de Kock could be their version of Warner TBH.
Warner, he's just a poor man's Alex Hales
it would be a very poor version,our bowlers will sort out de cock