Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 ... 105 106 [107] 108 109 ... 121

Author Topic: South Africa vs England  (Read 242660 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

HuwMawr

  • Village Cricketer
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 21
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: South Africa vs England
« Reply #1590 on: January 22, 2016, 08:29:00 PM »

Great knock by cook. His old man was mustard when I first started watching county cricket. Wielded a PS Corniche with style.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Logged

mcgill123

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 203
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: South Africa vs England
« Reply #1591 on: January 22, 2016, 11:09:01 PM »

Just finished watching.
SA should be looking at 500 min on that road, I know you should never judge a track until both teams have batted but it looked as flat as witches bits.
S Cook looked a class act, SA selectors should be ashamed of their oversight.
YJB should've bagged a couple of easy chances, very poor footwork.
Logged

Aussie In England

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 766
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Aussie father + Kiwi mother = Aussie in London
Re: South Africa vs England
« Reply #1592 on: January 22, 2016, 11:26:10 PM »

Just finished watching.
SA should be looking at 500 min on that road, I know you should never judge a track until both teams have batted but it looked as flat as witches bits.
S Cook looked a class act, SA selectors should be ashamed of their oversight.
YJB should've bagged a couple of easy chances, very poor footwork.
SA don't have much batting after Bavuma and de Kock, so 500 is pretty optimistic, 400-450 could be feasible if these can build a partnership. I'm favouring 370 all out TBH
Logged
"With great power comes great responsibility". Ben Parker

mcgill123

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 203
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: South Africa vs England
« Reply #1593 on: January 22, 2016, 11:29:39 PM »

SA don't have much batting after Bavuma and de Kock, so 500 is pretty optimistic, 400-450 could be feasible if these can build a partnership. I'm favouring 370 all out TBH
Sorry my bad, it was meant as more of a reference as to what they should've expected to get with regards to how good the wicket was.
Logged

InternalTraining

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4792
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: South Africa vs England
« Reply #1594 on: January 23, 2016, 01:33:39 AM »

That Amla innings was something! His drives were just magnificent!
Logged

csnew

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4471
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: South Africa vs England
« Reply #1595 on: January 23, 2016, 10:23:57 AM »

3rd catch now gone between bairstow and cook!
Logged

dcullen8

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 617
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: South Africa vs England
« Reply #1596 on: January 23, 2016, 10:24:09 AM »

For how good england where in the ashes, their catching has been on the steady decline since!

Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk

Logged

FattusCattus

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9708
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Bend it like Fattus!!
Re: South Africa vs England
« Reply #1597 on: January 23, 2016, 10:28:59 AM »

For me, de Kock stands out this morning.
Logged
If you tolerate this, then your baked goods will be next.

ProCricketer1982

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7432
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: South Africa vs England
« Reply #1598 on: January 23, 2016, 10:29:12 AM »

For how good england where in the ashes, their catching has been on the steady decline since!

Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk

Dead rubber, none of them look interested. Only players with anything to play for are hales and woakes
Logged

FattusCattus

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9708
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Bend it like Fattus!!
Re: South Africa vs England
« Reply #1599 on: January 23, 2016, 10:41:43 AM »

Woakes could potentially rule himself out of the running as a test bowler here.
Logged
If you tolerate this, then your baked goods will be next.

mcgill123

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 203
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: South Africa vs England
« Reply #1600 on: January 23, 2016, 11:16:54 AM »

Dead rubber, none of them look interested. Only players with anything to play for are hales and woakes
I'd add Compton, Taylor and Bairstow(keeping wise) to that list.
Logged

rickjames

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5094
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: South Africa vs England
« Reply #1601 on: January 23, 2016, 11:32:14 AM »

My eyes are starting to hurt
Logged

Wickets-then-runs

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 730
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: South Africa vs England
« Reply #1602 on: January 23, 2016, 11:40:19 AM »

De Kok standing proud!  :)
Logged

iand123

  • Moderator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3918
  • Trade Count: (+13)
Re: South Africa vs England
« Reply #1603 on: January 23, 2016, 11:52:53 AM »

You just know England will make this pitch look like a minefield when they bat
Logged

csnew

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4471
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: South Africa vs England
« Reply #1604 on: January 23, 2016, 11:56:15 AM »

De kock teeing off now! This lad can bat. Owed his team a performance after cocking it up last match
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 105 106 [107] 108 109 ... 121
 

Advertise on CBF