Advertise on CBF

Poll

Choose one option?

XP80
- 22 (25.9%)
50+
- 21 (24.7%)
Warner's
- 15 (17.6%)
Neither
- 11 (12.9%)
Be Snoop Dogg and invest in weed
- 16 (18.8%)

Total Members Voted: 83

Pages: [1] 2 3

Author Topic: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's  (Read 8647 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Cover_Drive

  • Moderator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5698
  • Trade Count: (+14)
XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« on: April 06, 2016, 04:37:22 AM »
Logged
Twitter: @_UzairM

Cover_Drive

  • Moderator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5698
  • Trade Count: (+14)
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #1 on: April 06, 2016, 04:39:40 AM »
Personally, I would go for 50+ and I am very tempted to get that.

I hope Kingsgrove get it for cheaper than GCCC.
Logged
Twitter: @_UzairM

smilley792

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8755
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Willoooowwwww
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #2 on: April 06, 2016, 04:51:43 AM »
One of each please.
Logged
@chrisjones792
Fastest ton- 54balls

Six Sixes Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4335
  • Trade Count: (+20)
    • Six Sixes Cricket Ltd
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #3 on: April 06, 2016, 05:23:38 AM »
Is the 50+ and warners the same or warners slightly bigger?
Logged

aussie.kooky

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 51
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #4 on: April 06, 2016, 05:26:44 AM »
XP80 is a great T20 shape. We are spoiled for choice in Australia , but boy ..... we pay through the roof.
Logged

langer17

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2002
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #5 on: April 06, 2016, 05:53:53 AM »
They look the same. I prefer the stickers on the 50+ though. The XP80 wins for me though.
Logged

Buzz

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12674
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Clear your mind, stay still and watch the ball
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #6 on: April 06, 2016, 06:14:19 AM »
I am not sure I could lift any of them!
Logged
"Bradman didn't used to have any trigger movements or anything like that. He turned batting into a subconscious act" Tony Shillinglaw.

well past my peak

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 314
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #7 on: April 06, 2016, 07:08:08 AM »
Xp80 over the others but perhaps the Xp70 would be more manageable, as my prefer weight is around 2'8

From GCCC you'll be paying through the nose. Maybe a cheaper option to get one mapped via B3.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2016, 07:19:56 AM by well past my peak »
Logged

well past my peak

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 314
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #8 on: April 06, 2016, 07:12:25 AM »
Quote from: d7bow on April 06, 2016, 05:23:38 AM
Is the 50+ and warners the same or warners slightly bigger?

the handles are different lengths, warners being cut down
« Last Edit: April 06, 2016, 07:27:12 AM by well past my peak »
Logged

tim2000s

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10678
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • If I only could bat....
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #9 on: April 06, 2016, 08:56:26 AM »
They all look like variations on the same shape with alterations to suit weight. Take the biggest, then reduce edge sizes and amount of concaving and you end up at the other two.
Logged

Neon Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2802
  • Trade Count: (+2)
    • Neon Cricket
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #10 on: April 06, 2016, 09:13:07 AM »
So who fancies buying all 3 and letting us get them mapped by B3? haha
Logged
Email: adam@neoncricket.co.uk
Website: www.neoncricket.co.uk
Social Media: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram

skip1973

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1576
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #11 on: April 06, 2016, 09:22:50 AM »
Quote from: Cover_Drive on April 06, 2016, 04:39:40 AM
Personally, I would go for 50+ and I am very tempted to get that.

I hope Kingsgrove get it for cheaper than GCCC.
Will be around the same.
Logged

skip1973

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1576
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #12 on: April 06, 2016, 09:25:03 AM »
Quote from: aussie.kooky on April 06, 2016, 05:26:44 AM
XP80 is a great T20 shape. We are spoiled for choice in Australia , but boy ..... we pay through the roof.
Try and get bats these size and quality for less anywhere else.
Logged

skip1973

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1576
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #13 on: April 06, 2016, 09:26:27 AM »
Quote from: well past my peak on April 06, 2016, 07:08:08 AM
Xp80 over the others but perhaps the Xp70 would be more manageable, as my prefer weight is around 2'8

From GCCC you'll be paying through the nose. Maybe a cheaper option to get one mapped via B3.
There are options below the the XP 70 as well.
Logged

Blazer

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 996
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Team Anti - Concave !.
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #14 on: April 06, 2016, 10:07:15 AM »
Is it just me or that XP80 looks like H4L tempo or MH distinction in heavier weight ?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3
« previous next »
 

Advertise on CBF