Surely BT sport is cheaper and more affordable than having Sky though at £3 a month + £19 line rental which most people have to take the hit on anyway.
Are you suggesting people ditch sky for bt?
How do they watch the rest of sky's cricket, f1 and anything else they watch via sky?
To me this is like football. Sky has rights to one portion for the sport, bt the other, so to watch everything I have to pay for both.
Which ain't cheap whichever way you look at it.
So for someone that has sky not just for cricket and now has to add bt, it's just costing us more money while another CEO gets to buy his 5th beach house.
People will spout the "it's bringing money into the sport" yes it is but it's also slowly killing off the fans that love the sport.