The butterfly mark is a dead zone!
Until it is knocked/played in, which admittedly can take an agonisingly long time, then its probably the most responsive part of the whole tree. In an era where people demand instant performance from the day of purchase, and value is put on looks, its easy to see why butterfly has fallen out of favour. At one time it was the most valuable type of willow.
Tim Phillips using a b3 butterfly he didn't even knock in!!https://youtu.be/VeJQoKNF-x4Definately no performance there..........
Last year sd sold the kookaburra bubble star that was bleached underneath was butterfly stains and cost 11 pound some of the best pinging bats I have had take time to get going but boy do they go
No, they don't! You are hallucinating.
You may call yourself some high profile bat expert but sorry, I don't agree with you.Butterfly mark does not get any better even if you bang it with a sledge hammer.
I don't call myself anything.
The reality is that I don't have a lot of time during or before season to knock (net or mallet) a bat to prepare it. Naturally, the bat that opens up quickly with little effort is the winner. I am not the only one who feels this way and this is the reality of today's amateur/hobbyist cricketer. Having said that, bats that open up quickly or are not less durable than ones that take a long time.
I was gonna post this on the Lignum Vitae mallet thread. I have a grainy RNS kohli profile. The bat ping at start was average. At the same time i bought the mallet. So religiously i spent 10-15 minutes daily knocking the bat. That bat has opened up so well that it may be one of the best pinging bats i have with me. It took time but worth the effort. And since i know how well the bat is knocked, i should be less worried of edge cracks etc.