I don't think pace is particularly a worry we have plenty of people who can bowl early 90's it's just comparing them to someone like starc who can bowl nearly 100 mph deadly accurate Yorkers it makes our guys look like the u14's at your local club
Cant think of that many English bowlers hitting 90mph regulary who are fitMight be why england keep trying Finn because he can, or could.woakes is quicker than most others we have nowWood when fit is by far the fastest we have...when fit. Mills only bowls 4 over spells these days.
Test or one day? @RPC/Blueroom Cricket - Adie
take your pick.. I'm interested to see this list of bowlers England have who bowl consistently 90mph
Because the format demands risk taking shots
Anderson took alot of time to become the bowler he is now.
Haha are you for real? 2 top order wickets and 2 at the end, I would say that is a pretty good days work for a seam bowler in an ODI. All 3 seamers bowled well although I am starting to worry about Finns missing 10mph
Woakes is good enough to continue in the side. Don't think he needs replacing in odi or tests. His stats are pretty decent and he will get better. Im not saying his as good as Anderson but Anderson took alot of time to become the bowler he is now.
You are right about Woakes, regularly clocked high 80s, however I have a horrible feeling he will come onto the bat lovely on Australian wickets. I sincerely hope Im wrong, he has proved plenty of people wrong so far
Having watched the match the 2 top order players Woakes got out looked very ordinary regardless who was bowling 2 poor shots to balls that they could have left but didn't and the 2 at the end well they were tailenders with an ave of 13 and 4 just throwing the bat as the game was all but lost.