Anderson's record in Australia is average at best!
Stokes just seems to make things happen, and he's bowled well in Australia in his one series there so far.
Wood, I hate to say it, won't last the tour. His body just isn't designed for Test cricket.
Doesn't Finn have a nack of taking wickets in Australia, maybe take him on the tour?
Woakes is a shoe in to travel if fit, if he's effective remains to be seen.
With TRJ, Broad & Ball we aren't short of seamers. It's the lack of spinners may be an issue but that's been know for ages
Agree with all except : last time eng toured oz Finn was deemed 'impossible to select' by ecb selectors . Also , unless you have a big turning leggie you trust (so that rules out Rashid) , then a finger spinner of Ali's level should suffice for the job .
Personally, i love Woakes as a player , but i dont think you need /should want Woakes and Anderson in the same side in Australia. . With Anderson's mediocre aussie record and Woakes' superior batting, id opt for the latter .
Personally i think trj just looks perfectly suited to oz conditions and should be a definite starter .
Bat Ali at 8 , then 3 specialist bowlers ( woakes, broad, trj ) , along with stokes at 6 or 7 , bairstow at 6 or 7 , and 5 specialist batsmen..... england, just stop being indecisive re opener spot ( just decide on Hameed already and be done with it ) , then figure out the best bloke for the one available batting spot ( working from a starting point that Ballance is not to be picked under any circumstances ) ...... and presto - england test selection dilemas sorted !