No LBW's...
Advertise on CBF
Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: No LBW's...  (Read 5416 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

NT50

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 518
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: No LBW's...
« Reply #30 on: December 29, 2017, 10:49:02 PM »
Agree, if you have to take everything that competitively it's a little bit embarrassing, no?
Logged

edge

  • Moderator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4876
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: No LBW's...
« Reply #31 on: December 30, 2017, 01:31:19 AM »
Being competitive and being a (No Swearing Please) loser are very different things, don't let anyone try and trot that out as an excuse! Being competitive is about competition, not winning - I'd much rather play a close loss than a facile win. If you can't deal with losing then sport is not for you, let's be honest.
Logged
HS: 156, BB: 7-20

ProCricketer1982

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7432
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: No LBW's...
« Reply #32 on: December 30, 2017, 01:40:31 AM »
[quote author=edge link=topic=43515.msg697407#msg697407 date=1514597479 Being competitive is about competition, not winning - I'd much rather play a close loss than a facile win. If you can't deal with losing then sport is not for you, let's be honest.
[/quote]

And it’s about being competitive with yourself more than anything too, inner competitiveness. Always makes me laugh when people say they have to act a #£-=-+ to get ‘up’ for a game.. no, you’re just being a tool fella.. that’s not competitive at all.. Just being a tool
Logged

Woodyspin

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2232
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • www.twitter.com/thewoodyspin
Re: No LBW's...
« Reply #33 on: December 30, 2017, 02:38:41 AM »
Imagine a team chasing 120 being 30-9 inside 15 overs and being the no11 that takes an off stump guard amd squares himself up, and just stands there and doesnt even attempt to hit the ball for 30 overs. Not only does no LBWs make zero sense it also rules out bowled for 95% of batsman. I bet if you total up the wickets are taken by lbw and bowled they would outweigh caught, 43 to 40% the other 7% being run out/stumped. Given the circumstance above i would be 100% certain i wasnt getting out. Rule out bowled and lbw plus not even attempting to hit the ball i would never get caught. If i dont hit the ball i wont be running and if i dont move i cant be stumped... Easy game.

Ridiculous proposal. (All figures are inaccurate to prove a point.)
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]
« previous next »
 

Advertise on CBF