Surely picking Jennings again is just an admission that denly was an appalling choice of backup opener and that they don’t fancy him either. What a shambles.
Atherton nailed it squad selection for windies tour wrong 3 keepers 3 spinners no backup opener.
The issue is he has been scoring runs... In fact, he's England's 5th highest scorer for the tour, not bad for a no.8. Admittedly this isn't a lot of runs, but nobody has scored heavily for England this tour.He's also looked more assured than any of the "batsmen" ahead of him too. As @Bats_Entertainment said if you had to pick someone from the England side to bat for your life you'd chose him ahead of any of the top order. (I'd also accept the inevitable and call my loved ones to say goodbye if I was relying on the current shower of (No Swearing Please)...)He's not been dropped on cricketing grounds at all. Joey's mate Jonny wants the gloves, and what Joey's mates want they get! All this tour has proved is that you can't make a side of one day players and bit part "all rounders" into a quality test match side. It's time to pension off Bayliss, sack Root as captain and start from scratch, selecting your best players - not the captain and coaches favourite. If you do this Foakes will be one of the first names on the teamsheet!
I can allow the three keepers in that all of them are allegedly at the standard where they can be considered as specialist bats. Well, just about.But there was always one spinner too many, and one top order bat too few. Probably one fit quick bowler as well - I would have loved to see Jamie Overton let loose on these decks.
It's different batting at eight also not sure Bairstows a favourite he's been left out recently also can't really see how someone who's played 5 tests batting at 8 3 against weak opposition would be one of the first name on Englands team sheet
Commentators crictial over the selection of Jennings
Do you dislike Foakes because his name sounds similar to Woakes?