Interesting, isn't it? I suspect those talking about Lords are semi joking, but it's not daft to say England were 90 minutes less rain from the Ashes. Yet no one could credibly dispute that Australia were the dominant side.
I'm genuinely not sure what to make of that fact. Was it as simple as that Smith was the difference? I don't think it's that simple, because there were other exceptional performances, not least from Pat Cummins, who bowled longer and better than a man with his injury history has any right to.
Ho hum.
So, England. Lots of questions for the new coach to resolve, first of which has to be, what are England trying to achieve. Bayliss was a one day specialist who did well in one day cricket. We need a test man.