A topic to polarise opinion.....'Specs' are they all that?
Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 8

Author Topic: A topic to polarise opinion.....'Specs' are they all that?  (Read 10143 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

edge

Re: A topic to polarise opinion.....'Specs' are they all that?
« Reply #60 on: September 14, 2022, 12:53:00 PM »

Ha yeah that's more like it.

F (the force applied to the ball) = M (the mass of the ball) x A (the acceleration of the ball)
OR
F (the force applied to the bat) = M (the mass of the bat) x A (the acceleration of the bat)

If you want to calculate the exit speed of a ball hit by a bat of known mass and speed, you're going to need something more like this (simplified obviously):

Mball x Vball bowled + Mbat x Vbatswing = Mball x Vball exit + Mbat x Vbat after collision
Logged
HS: 156, BB: 7-20

t2ylo

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 961
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: A topic to polarise opinion.....'Specs' are they all that?
« Reply #61 on: September 14, 2022, 01:19:34 PM »

So “size” makes about the same difference as “stickers”?
Logged

Yorkershire

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 1165
  • Trade Count: (+7)
Re: A topic to polarise opinion.....'Specs' are they all that?
« Reply #62 on: September 14, 2022, 01:24:06 PM »

So “size” makes about the same difference as “stickers”?
No no if you have go faster stcikers just liek car paint jobs... the bat will be amazing!

lol Yes size shouldn't have an effect.

Just to throw a spanner in... what does the structure/density of the bat have on the springy-ness of the surface?   ;)
Logged

Tom

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5607
  • Trade Count: (+33)
    • www.cricketinsight.co.uk
Re: A topic to polarise opinion.....'Specs' are they all that?
« Reply #63 on: September 15, 2022, 02:06:33 PM »

Give Sam Fisher's thesis a read for just an idea of the physics involved in creating an improved cricket bat: https://purehost.bath.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/188135795/Sam_Fisher_thesis.pdf
Logged

Kulli

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5407
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Herr Kaleun
Re: A topic to polarise opinion.....'Specs' are they all that?
« Reply #64 on: September 15, 2022, 04:00:49 PM »

I struggle to see the ball without my specs so they’re pretty vital!
Logged
They won't catch us this time! Not this time! They haven't spotted us! No, they're all snoring in their bunks! Or, you know what? They're drinking at the bar, celebrating our sinking! Not yet, my friends. Not yet!

Bats_Entertainment

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5049
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: A topic to polarise opinion.....'Specs' are they all that?
« Reply #65 on: September 15, 2022, 04:38:14 PM »

Ha yeah that's more like it.

F (the force applied to the ball) = M (the mass of the ball) x A (the acceleration of the ball)
OR
F (the force applied to the bat) = M (the mass of the bat) x A (the acceleration of the bat)

If you want to calculate the exit speed of a ball hit by a bat of known mass and speed, you're going to need something more like this (simplified obviously):

Mball x Vball bowled + Mbat x Vbatswing = Mball x Vball exit + Mbat x Vbat after collision

Why didn't you say?   ;)
Logged

Chompy9760

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 272
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: A topic to polarise opinion.....'Specs' are they all that?
« Reply #66 on: September 16, 2022, 12:59:24 AM »

Give Sam Fisher's thesis a read for just an idea of the physics involved in creating an improved cricket bat: https://purehost.bath.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/188135795/Sam_Fisher_thesis.pdf

That is some pretty heavy reading, and I'm one of the few who don't mind a bit of maths and physics!!
Logged

Chompy9760

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 272
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: A topic to polarise opinion.....'Specs' are they all that?
« Reply #67 on: September 16, 2022, 01:05:32 AM »

Just to throw a spanner in... what does the structure/density of the bat have on the springy-ness of the surface?   ;)

Not that it particularly answers the question, but on page 95 of the above mentioned document, there are some interesting electron microscope pics of willow cellular structure of different parts of the bat.  Very interesting to see the effect of pressing/knocking, and how much of the 'wood' is actually air!
Logged

InternalTraining

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4792
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: A topic to polarise opinion.....'Specs' are they all that?
« Reply #68 on: September 16, 2022, 04:06:13 PM »


If you want to calculate the exit speed of a ball hit by a bat of known mass and speed, you're going to need something more like this (simplified obviously):

Mball x Vball bowled + Mbat x Vbatswing = Mball x Vball exit + Mbat x Vbat after collision

I think that is correct.

Question: We saw a phase where low-density bats were popular. Does the volume of the bat play any role in this transference of energy (force?) from bat to ball? What happens to the vibration of the bat (nodes of percussion?) when a bat has a larger volume but lighter due to low-density cleft?
Logged

InternalTraining

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4792
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: A topic to polarise opinion.....'Specs' are they all that?
« Reply #69 on: September 16, 2022, 04:13:11 PM »

Give Sam Fisher's thesis a read for just an idea of the physics involved in creating an improved cricket bat: https://purehost.bath.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/188135795/Sam_Fisher_thesis.pdf

From page 105:

Quote
All of the sections investigated during this chapter are interlinked, as the crushed cellular
structure is associated with an increase in density and the enhancement in the flexural stiffness
of the wooden samples. This is advantageous to the player as an increase in flexural stiffness is
associated with an increase in post impact ball velocity and thus an improvement in
performance. Finally, by crushing the cellular structure, the resistance to indentations and
splitting is improved as the density of the sample is increased. Therefore, the face of the bat
may last longer before showing signs of mechanical deterioration and a reduction in
performance.
Logged

Kulli

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5407
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Herr Kaleun
Re: A topic to polarise opinion.....'Specs' are they all that?
« Reply #70 on: September 16, 2022, 04:24:29 PM »

Doesn’t that basically just say pressing a cleft is positive?
Logged
They won't catch us this time! Not this time! They haven't spotted us! No, they're all snoring in their bunks! Or, you know what? They're drinking at the bar, celebrating our sinking! Not yet, my friends. Not yet!

InternalTraining

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4792
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: A topic to polarise opinion.....'Specs' are they all that?
« Reply #71 on: September 16, 2022, 04:34:50 PM »

^ Pressing. Knocking. Playing in a bat.
Logged

edge

  • Moderator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4876
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: A topic to polarise opinion.....'Specs' are they all that?
« Reply #72 on: September 20, 2022, 07:22:19 AM »

Question: We saw a phase where low-density bats were popular. Does the volume of the bat play any role in this transference of energy (force?) from bat to ball? What happens to the vibration of the bat (nodes of percussion?) when a bat has a larger volume but lighter due to low-density cleft?
Larger volume gives a slightly stiffer bat, so slightly better transfer of energy into the ball. Minimal if any difference to vibrational nodes.
Logged
HS: 156, BB: 7-20

InternalTraining

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4792
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: A topic to polarise opinion.....'Specs' are they all that?
« Reply #73 on: September 20, 2022, 05:05:33 PM »

^ Ok. So, a low-density, larger (than normal volume) cleft is better for a lighter bat.

I wonder if bat makers have a formula to compare rebound from  a low-density cleft/bat of X weight v/s normal-density cleft/bat of Y (> X) weight. Example: Low-density bat of 2lb-8oz ping/rebound = normal-density bat of 2lb-11oz.
Logged

Kulli

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5407
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Herr Kaleun
Re: A topic to polarise opinion.....'Specs' are they all that?
« Reply #74 on: September 20, 2022, 07:17:21 PM »

Wonder no more, they don’t.
Logged
They won't catch us this time! Not this time! They haven't spotted us! No, they're all snoring in their bunks! Or, you know what? They're drinking at the bar, celebrating our sinking! Not yet, my friends. Not yet!
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 8
 

Advertise on CBF