AS v3 - PUMA BALLISTIC 6000
Advertise on CBF
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: AS v3 - PUMA BALLISTIC 6000  (Read 10592 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Majid_V3

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 189
  • Trade Count: (0)
AS v3 - PUMA BALLISTIC 6000
« on: August 15, 2008, 05:26:23 PM »





AS v3 restickered as PUMA BALLISTIC 6000, 2.9LB, 13/14 GRAINS, LIGHT PICK UP, 33MM EDGES, TEST REBOUND QUALITIES.
« Last Edit: August 22, 2008, 07:12:14 PM by Majid_V389 »
Logged

maXXed

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 164
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: New PUMA BALLISTIC 6000
« Reply #1 on: August 15, 2008, 05:33:46 PM »
Test Rebound Qualities :L

you do say some savage bullshit majjy baby
Logged

Arthur

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 436
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Re: New PUMA BALLISTIC 6000
« Reply #2 on: August 15, 2008, 07:30:35 PM »
Bet you it's not a Puma, and Majid, will you just shut up about your "Test Rebound Qualities", it's utter (No Swearing Please).
Logged

Tom

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5607
  • Trade Count: (+33)
    • www.cricketinsight.co.uk
Re: New PUMA BALLISTIC 6000
« Reply #3 on: August 15, 2008, 08:08:18 PM »
It's an AS V3 I think.
Logged

Howzat

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5505
  • Trade Count: (+7)
Re: New PUMA BALLISTIC 6000
« Reply #4 on: August 15, 2008, 08:08:37 PM »
Its not a puma lol But please be more understanding... If he says it has test rebound qualities then thats fine.
He bought 2 grips and 3 sets of stickers from GCCC... it set him back £90 odd pounds after postage and import tax!!!!
Logged
Top Scores: 171,112,100,99,86*,74*  Best Bowling: 5/18

maXXed

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 164
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: New PUMA BALLISTIC 6000
« Reply #5 on: August 15, 2008, 09:07:22 PM »
Quote from: Tom on August 15, 2008, 08:08:18 PM
It's an AS V3 I think.

How the hell do you know that!
Logged

Talisman

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 603
  • Trade Count: (+76)
Re: New PUMA BALLISTIC 6000
« Reply #6 on: August 15, 2008, 09:11:00 PM »
Why post a lie???

Why not say that you like the AS bats and the Puma stickers. And AS over dry their bats so they do ping well but crack up far too quickly.
Logged

Tom

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5607
  • Trade Count: (+33)
    • www.cricketinsight.co.uk
Re: New PUMA BALLISTIC 6000
« Reply #7 on: August 15, 2008, 09:12:29 PM »
He said he had a V3 to me over MSN Maxxed.
Logged

dan_griffin11

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 697
  • Trade Count: (+6)
Re: New PUMA BALLISTIC 6000
« Reply #8 on: August 15, 2008, 09:15:11 PM »
yep it's def an as v3
Logged

Sambo

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 407
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • All poms shall be whacked
    • Coomera-Hope Island CC
Re: New PUMA BALLISTIC 6000
« Reply #9 on: August 16, 2008, 01:08:25 AM »
and it looked like one
Logged

maXXed

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 164
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: New PUMA BALLISTIC 6000
« Reply #10 on: August 16, 2008, 09:50:05 AM »
Quote from: Tom on August 15, 2008, 09:12:29 PM
He said he had a V3 to me over MSN Maxxed.

Ah, that's OK then!
Logged

Tikolo

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 112
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • There's only one Steve Tikolo
Re: New PUMA BALLISTIC 6000
« Reply #11 on: August 16, 2008, 05:24:15 PM »
Its dosent have the Milichamp and Hall handle on this bat like all the pumas have
Logged

Majid_V3

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 189
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: New PUMA BALLISTIC 6000
« Reply #12 on: August 18, 2008, 01:42:43 PM »
Quote from: Talisman on August 15, 2008, 09:11:00 PM
Why post a lie???

Why not say that you like the AS bats and the Puma stickers. And AS over dry their bats so they do ping well but crack up far too quickly.

I didn't post a lie mate I told these ppl on msn that I was goin to resticker my AS v3 most of them know this was AS v3.
Talisman I dont think AS over dry their bats these v3 bats are made of players grade light premium quality Eng Willow clefts. I've used this bat for 4/5 matches and have made two 50s it hasn't cracked up yet when i removed the extratec it had very light surface cracks along the grains.
The profile does looks huge wid puma stickers on it I've compared it to kooka big kahuna 2.13 my v3 is almost twice as thick and 4/5 oz lighter.
Logged

Talisman

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 603
  • Trade Count: (+76)
Re: AS v3 restickered as PUMA BALLISTIC 6000
« Reply #13 on: August 18, 2008, 07:30:29 PM »
Majid, I don't think that they are over dried, I know they are. They dry the bats to far less than 14% moisture to ensure a big shape for the weight. This will cause the bats to break quicker than the standard clefts. If you had ever had a player cleft then you would know that they are very light, very light and very rare. All this player grade stuff is silly, nice grains are a start but air dried willow is essential. And why do you want to always put other stickers on your bats, if they are test player grade, extra exclusive ultra rebound 110% pinging over sized monsters then why not keep the makers logos on the bats?
Logged

art

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 234
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: AS v3 restickered as PUMA BALLISTIC 6000
« Reply #14 on: August 18, 2008, 08:53:12 PM »
Why don't we cut the personal attacks and let a player get on with what he does the way he likes to do it.

I gave a piece of advice to a batmaker recently about how to brand a bat and one of the points I made was that there are so many stickers available to people that in the end who really knows who is using what.

Frankly it is about time prominant manufacturers of cricket equipement (and other sporting equipment) acted the part and protected their brand names rather than fostering this illicit trade that you yourselves demand be stopped in certain other others. A name sticker on a no name bat is just as much an offence as a name sticker on a fake pair of running shoes. Oh and frankly just for a little information a lot of cheap 'fake' product is a heck of a lot better than the so called 'name' brands.

Big manugfacturers of so called sporting goods are allowing the blurring of trade mark useage for their benefit when they profit by it but their actions reduce the effectiveness of trade marks in all areas. If you are not prepared to properly protect them at all times get off your soap box, changes are coming.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »
 

Advertise on CBF