i wouldnt drop him, but after so long out injured and no real game time i would have brought him straight back in either. in an ideal world, i would have him as a batter only and foakes keeping. would mean brook or crawley missing out though
Fair play to Tongue, very impressivePrepared to risk boundaries in order to take a wicket. Anderson and Robinson looking military so far but Broad has bowled well again
I don't disagree, apart from I think his batting in the 1st test justified his selection as a batter. In an ideal world you would have Foakes in, but I don't think that's Bairstows fault. Surely Stokes and the selectors make that call. Can't say I agree with Brook being anywhere near the conversation of who would miss out tho, Crawley not so much!
.Thought Anderson looked absolutely unplayable early doors, ball was doing all sorts. Robinson down on pace again which is a bit concerning, thought he'd worked it out during the winter tours.
Have to admit I didn't watch the very start.The bit I was watching both bats were walking down the pitch at him which is not good to see
Lords test this AM.Packed house.I have to say I think the Aussies are playing the pre match stuff better just ignoring the rubbish from the Eng camp.Starc likely to play in place of Boland.I can't see Marnus and Smith having another quiet week.Going to be a good toss to loose today I think as it will be a bowl first morning, whereas it is usually better to bat first...Absolutely vital for England to have a strong first session. Our record at Lords against the Aussies is really dreadful.But from some poor decisions Eng would have won that first game. I think we will see some pragmatism start creeping into the Bazball approach.Honestly, my money is on Aus going 2-0 up.