Me+U
Advertise on CBF
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Me+U  (Read 2427 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

thegowerwaft

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 591
  • Trade Count: (0)
Me+U
« on: February 12, 2024, 10:04:51 AM »
New shoe company. Might be of interest to people:

https://meplusu.co.uk/
Logged
"The only way he was ever likely to play cricket at the highest level would be if he played on the top of a mountain" Mrs Harper 2014

Ayrtek Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14740
  • Trade Count: (+53)
  • www.AyrtekCricket.com
    • Ayrtek Cricket
Re: Me+U
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2024, 10:11:26 AM »
hoping to get hold of a few pairs once released, let me know if any interest from CBFer's in them and can tag some onto the order.
Logged

Jimbo

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 3243
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Me+U
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2024, 10:14:01 AM »
Believe these are the same guys that were behind Stag Cricket.
Logged

maxi17

  • Village Cricketer
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Me+U
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2024, 07:27:23 PM »
Look a bit similar to Payntr IMO
Logged

mo_town

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1103
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Me+U
« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2024, 12:21:53 PM »
What the market really needs is a budget shoe for the casual cricketer with attractive designs! Cant see how this brand will stand out amongst the competition. For that price, one would prefer getting a popular brand of shoe.
Logged

Yorkershire

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1163
  • Trade Count: (+7)
Re: Me+U
« Reply #5 on: February 15, 2024, 12:39:03 PM »
Payntr version 2.0
Logged

willmau5

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 58
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SR is more important than Avg
Re: Me+U
« Reply #6 on: February 15, 2024, 01:30:34 PM »
Quote from: mo_town on February 15, 2024, 12:21:53 PM
What the market really needs is a budget shoe for the casual cricketer with attractive designs! Cant see how this brand will stand out amongst the competition. For that price, one would prefer getting a popular brand of shoe.

Absolutely. How many clubbies are going to drop 120 sheets on a pair of spikes?
Logged

jonny77

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2401
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Me+U
« Reply #7 on: February 15, 2024, 01:30:53 PM »
Quote from: mo_town on February 15, 2024, 12:21:53 PM
What the market really needs is a budget shoe for the casual cricketer with attractive designs! Cant see how this brand will stand out amongst the competition. For that price, one would prefer getting a popular brand of shoe.

Isn't that where GM and Kook come into the equation? Cheaper than most and fairly inoffensive. Or look around fire last year's. Picked up some new 2023 NB CK10s for 50 quid recently online.

Great to see new brands but there branding isn't my style. They look a decently made shoe tho.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2024, 01:33:04 PM by jonny77 »
Logged

Jimbo

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 3243
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Me+U
« Reply #8 on: February 15, 2024, 02:38:32 PM »
Quote from: jonny77 on February 15, 2024, 01:30:53 PM
Isn't that where GM and Kook come into the equation? Cheaper than most and fairly inoffensive. Or look around fire last year's. Picked up some new 2023 NB CK10s for 50 quid recently online.

Great to see new brands but there branding isn't my style. They look a decently made shoe tho.

Pretty much, yep. I've got a pair of Kookaburra astro shoes and they're comfy, have lasted well and look pretty decent. Paid maybe £35 for them.
Logged

mo_town

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1103
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Me+U
« Reply #9 on: February 15, 2024, 05:02:41 PM »
What I meant was for a new brand launch, it would be great if someone came up with cheap shoe alternatives.
Logged

jonny77

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2401
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Me+U
« Reply #10 on: February 15, 2024, 06:16:35 PM »
Difficult to do with shoes if you're designing a truly new product I'd imagine. I'd imagine there's a lot of cost involved in research, design and production if doing it properly and not just using a 'white label' type approach.
Logged

SOULMAN1012

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6808
  • Trade Count: (+27)
Re: Me+U
« Reply #11 on: February 15, 2024, 06:20:16 PM »
Sorry not my cup of tea at all and for that price that’s top end adidas, NB, ASICS territory and I know where I would trust spending £120
Logged

maxi17

  • Village Cricketer
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Me+U
« Reply #12 on: February 15, 2024, 09:09:25 PM »
Quote from: SOULMAN1012 on February 15, 2024, 06:20:16 PM
Sorry not my cup of tea at all and for that price that’s top end adidas, NB, ASICS territory and I know where I would trust spending £120


couldn't agree more. For me can't go wrong with a pair of asics!!
Logged

Bats_Entertainment

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5041
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Me+U
« Reply #13 on: February 15, 2024, 11:57:49 PM »
People don't half come out with some crazy names for sports brands?

Logged

Bats_Entertainment

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5041
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Me+U
« Reply #14 on: February 16, 2024, 12:00:05 AM »
Not a bad looking shoe if you removed the branding.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »
 

Advertise on CBF