Advertise on CBF
Pages: 1 ... 37 38 [39] 40 41 ... 43

Author Topic: ENG vs PAK -  (Read 45285 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

thebd11

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 461
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #570 on: September 22, 2010, 08:39:03 PM »
yes ijaz butt, we were paid to WIN that game , big 2 fingers up to him :)
Logged
Talks to much bull,

Best figures >>>>> 4-3-6-1

Best Score >>>>>> 88 (50) 6x4 6x6

:D

tim2000s

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10678
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • If I only could bat....
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #571 on: September 22, 2010, 08:39:14 PM »
Does the ECB now get the point that matches under lights in September are mostly pointless and the side that bats first generally wins?
Logged

Wills

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1365
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Seams too good to be true
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #572 on: September 22, 2010, 08:39:52 PM »
Must say England deserved to win after the Irishman's knock.
Logged

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #573 on: September 22, 2010, 08:42:24 PM »
Quote from: WazzaAfridi on September 22, 2010, 08:39:52 PM
Must say England deserved to win after the Irishman's knock.

Cheap shot
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

tim2000s

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10678
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • If I only could bat....
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #574 on: September 22, 2010, 08:43:16 PM »
Yes, but is such a big win a deliberate result, or did Morgan bat well and Swann bowl well? Earlier goings on in the summer leave you with a seed of doubt, don't they!
Logged

essexarsenal

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 516
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #575 on: September 22, 2010, 08:43:32 PM »
Quote from: thebd11 on September 22, 2010, 08:39:03 PM
yes ijaz butt, we were paid to WIN that game , big 2 fingers up to him :)

lmfao
Logged

Cover_Drive

  • Moderator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5698
  • Trade Count: (+14)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #576 on: September 22, 2010, 08:44:00 PM »
And controversial tours ends. Don't know why allegations come out right when Pakistan is in winning position. I must say credit goes to English media who does it soo well :)
Logged
Twitter: @_UzairM

norbs

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 821
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #577 on: September 22, 2010, 08:44:24 PM »
Quote from: WazzaAfridi on September 22, 2010, 08:39:52 PM
Must say England deserved to win after the Irishman's knock.

who Owen Morgan Smith?
Logged

Wills

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1365
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Seams too good to be true
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #578 on: September 22, 2010, 08:44:43 PM »
Quote from: roco on September 22, 2010, 08:42:24 PM
Cheap shot
i have the south african aspect to back me up if needed! ;)

and norbs, is that meant to be funny?
Logged

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #579 on: September 22, 2010, 08:46:01 PM »
Still a cheap shot only one saffer in today thank you
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

Kaboom786

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 86
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #580 on: September 22, 2010, 08:46:18 PM »
Umpiring has been pathetic all series. If decision review system was used the series result would have been more fair. And Pakistan might have won the 2nd odi if Strauss's caught behind was referred to 3rd umpire. ICC definitely need to remove billy frm Pakistans matches because he has cost Pakistan lot of matches and a test series I remember against WI.
Logged

norbs

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 821
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #581 on: September 22, 2010, 08:46:50 PM »
Quote from: Cover_Drive on September 22, 2010, 08:44:00 PM
And controversial tours ends. Don't know why allegations come out right when Pakistan is in winning position.

There has been other controversial tours ??? who was involved in the last one? 
Logged

norbs

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 821
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #582 on: September 22, 2010, 08:47:36 PM »
Quote from: WazzaAfridi on September 22, 2010, 08:44:43 PM
and norbs, is that meant to be funny?

Yes I am a comedy genius
Logged

Cover_Drive

  • Moderator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5698
  • Trade Count: (+14)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #583 on: September 22, 2010, 08:48:25 PM »
Quote from: norbs on September 22, 2010, 08:46:50 PM
There has been other controversial tours ??? who was involved in the last one?

In 2006 Pakistan was FALSELY accused of ball tempering which was proved that Pakistan were CLEAN!

Inzamam was too good that he forgave Hair :)
Logged
Twitter: @_UzairM

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #584 on: September 22, 2010, 08:49:56 PM »
How was it proved as result was reversed but then reversed back I thought so last I heard it went down as a forfeit?
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.
Pages: 1 ... 37 38 [39] 40 41 ... 43
« previous next »
 

Advertise on CBF