Cheap and Nasty or Top of the range?
Advertise on CBF
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Cheap and Nasty or Top of the range?  (Read 5420 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Mr Cricket

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2106
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Cheap and Nasty or Top of the range?
« on: September 27, 2010, 09:00:56 PM »
Just having a quick thought on a boring Monday night, before Inbetweeners of course!

but many of the features i look for in a pair of batting gloves are more associated with the bottom end gloves instead of the top of the range ones

the low range gloves are generally lightweight and flexible where as the focus of the top of the range ones are more focussed on protection possibly at the slight expense of comfort.

Any thoughts?
Logged

Ayrtek Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14749
  • Trade Count: (+53)
  • www.AyrtekCricket.com
    • Ayrtek Cricket
Re: Cheap and Nasty or Top of the range?
« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2010, 09:04:41 PM »
what features do u look for as your first priority? Price or comfort?
Logged

Talisman

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 603
  • Trade Count: (+76)
Re: Cheap and Nasty or Top of the range?
« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2010, 09:15:47 PM »
In the words of Freddie Mercury, "I want it all".
Logged

Liam-SCCC

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5664
  • Trade Count: (+39)
Re: Cheap and Nasty or Top of the range?
« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2010, 09:17:08 PM »
puma 5000's, light and protective. Also incredibly comfortable.

the top of the range kooks are a bit weighty.

You can get top of the range gloves that are light comfy and protective.
Logged
Top Score: 102*                
Best Bowling: 7/29

Colesy

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7677
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • I hate losing more than I even wanna win.
Re: Cheap and Nasty or Top of the range?
« Reply #4 on: September 27, 2010, 09:28:44 PM »
Quote from: Talisman on September 27, 2010, 09:15:47 PM
In the words of Freddie Mercury, "I want it all".
I love that song :)

I'd want the best comfort and suitable protection for my budget, which is around £25
Logged
High scores: 255, 124, 114              Best figures: 5-19, 5-24, 5-26

rp27

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 958
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: Cheap and Nasty or Top of the range?
« Reply #5 on: September 27, 2010, 09:35:40 PM »
I'd want good protection over comfort tbh, but both is obviously nice, does anyone know if these are any good, and genuine? http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Newbery-SPS2-Camo-Cricket-Gloves-/330476683562
Logged
A pessimist is never disappointed.

Kulli

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 5407
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Herr Kaleun
Re: Cheap and Nasty or Top of the range?
« Reply #6 on: September 27, 2010, 09:40:57 PM »
Quote from: rp27 on September 27, 2010, 09:35:40 PM
I'd want good protection over comfort tbh, but both is obviously nice, does anyone know if these are any good, and genuine? http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Newbery-SPS2-Camo-Cricket-Gloves-/330476683562


Newbery are the seller so you'd hope they'd be genuine.
Logged
They won't catch us this time! Not this time! They haven't spotted us! No, they're all snoring in their bunks! Or, you know what? They're drinking at the bar, celebrating our sinking! Not yet, my friends. Not yet!

rp27

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 958
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: Cheap and Nasty or Top of the range?
« Reply #7 on: September 27, 2010, 09:45:28 PM »
oh, i didnt realise they were, thanks, they seem pretty cheap so was just wondering
Logged
A pessimist is never disappointed.

Kulli

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 5407
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Herr Kaleun
Re: Cheap and Nasty or Top of the range?
« Reply #8 on: September 27, 2010, 09:49:29 PM »
Quote from: rp27 on September 27, 2010, 09:45:28 PM
oh, i didnt realise they were, thanks, they seem pretty cheap so was just wondering
Yeah, flogging off excess stock to make way for next season stuff I'd guess. Bargins to be had if you're not too fussy.
Logged
They won't catch us this time! Not this time! They haven't spotted us! No, they're all snoring in their bunks! Or, you know what? They're drinking at the bar, celebrating our sinking! Not yet, my friends. Not yet!

tim2000s

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10678
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • If I only could bat....
Re: Cheap and Nasty or Top of the range?
« Reply #9 on: September 28, 2010, 07:53:28 AM »
I'm not too fussy, so definitely time for a bargain.
Logged

Mr Cricket

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2106
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Re: Cheap and Nasty or Top of the range?
« Reply #10 on: September 28, 2010, 08:15:19 AM »
im not overly worried about 'test match protection' since im not a test match player and i dont face test match bowlers very often. Currently own gm original le's and sometimes wonder what the point is! Next gloves will be low range me thinks!
Logged

peplow

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6791
  • Trade Count: (+77)
Re: Cheap and Nasty or Top of the range?
« Reply #11 on: September 28, 2010, 08:16:42 AM »
Got some bargain lekka gloves going guys... seem like good protection and flexible, like puma gloves of years gone by :)
Logged

mdl_1979

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 796
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Re: Cheap and Nasty or Top of the range?
« Reply #12 on: September 28, 2010, 08:27:10 AM »
All I would say is that I broke fingers fairly regularly when I was a youngster, and haven't got even close to breaking one since I have been back in the game, so modern, protective gloves for me every day of the week.
Logged

RoCo Da Pixie

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2600
  • Trade Count: (+10)
Re: Cheap and Nasty or Top of the range?
« Reply #13 on: September 28, 2010, 08:52:50 AM »
I have modern well padded gloves, but they are also very comfortable,

Past two sets of gloves have been,
Redback & M&H Both very comfy and great protection.
Logged

sgcricket

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1102
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Cheap and Nasty or Top of the range?
« Reply #14 on: September 28, 2010, 06:32:46 PM »
i have used the SG hilites for the last 5 years and they have been very comfy as well as lightweight and flexible. also i think they offer test level protection (although that is not something that i look for. at my level, more interested in the palm and flexibility)
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »
 

Advertise on CBF