Custom Bats Cricket Forum

Equipment => Bats => Topic started by: jonpinson on May 27, 2011, 07:00:10 PM

Title: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: jonpinson on May 27, 2011, 07:00:10 PM
It only occured to me today that this year's IPL has been completely devoid of the Mongoose brand. Now, considering that last year even the IPL itself was trying to ram the brand down our throats, it seems odd that this year there hasn't been so much as a word.

All part of the masterplan or has it fallen flat on it's face?
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: Whispering Death on May 27, 2011, 07:01:17 PM
can't say i'd buy one - not a fan off the stickers or stories i have heard in terms of performance...
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: jonpinson on May 27, 2011, 07:04:04 PM
That's neither here nor there though. I don't like the idea, it doesn't suit my playing style, but I'd imagine they got a lot of sales off the back of last year's promotion via the IPL.
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: tommo256 on May 27, 2011, 07:08:52 PM
I thought that tonight, it seems strange how last year the world and there wife was using one and now this use its dead out
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: justnotcricket86 on May 27, 2011, 07:25:59 PM
fad
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: 19reading87 on May 27, 2011, 07:39:53 PM
Does Tom still work for them?
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: jonpinson on May 28, 2011, 07:23:24 PM
Interesting lack of response as we have at least one member directly associated with the brand. If the technology did indeed perform as described, surely we'd have seem players choosing to use them in the IPL this year.

Except Tresco who in current form could score runs with a stick of celery, all the big name sponsorships seem to have gone too.

I know Tom left, we wern't told why.
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: Whispering Death on May 28, 2011, 07:30:30 PM
but is he actually using a mongoose as the guy at m&h tells me that tresco gave m&h one of his geese to copy as it was an absolute plank!!!
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: jonpinson on May 28, 2011, 07:42:58 PM
but is he actually using a mongoose as the guy at m&h tells me that tresco gave m&h one of his geese to copy as it was an absolute plank!!!

Unless that can be verified I wouldn't read too much into it. It would hardly be the first time a batmaker...sorry, bat sander made an almost unverifiable claim against a rival brand. For that to be the case, the bat in question would have to have been tried and tested, I just can't see it. Besides, I know of no batmakers employed by MH these days. Just some guys handy with a sander and adept at applying stickers.

I have no axe to grind with Mongoose, although I'll admit the concept does nothing for me and if their claims were accurate the pro market would be flooded with them. Whether Tresco uses a Mongoose or another bat restickered I don't know, but there seems to have been a sensational fall from grace in just 12 months.
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: FattusCattus on May 28, 2011, 07:48:12 PM
I know Tom left, we wern't told why.

Probably because it's none of our business.
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: Liam-SCCC on May 28, 2011, 07:51:07 PM
Probably because it's none of our business.
If I could like that post I would.
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: jonpinson on May 28, 2011, 07:51:44 PM
Probably because it's none of our business.

Indeed. The thread isn't about that though.
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: justnotcricket86 on May 28, 2011, 07:59:21 PM
Jon - both Rob and Nick at MH are podshavers to my knowledge? Not just sanders and sticker applying executives
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: FattusCattus on May 28, 2011, 08:06:57 PM
Indeed. The thread isn't about that though.

No, but your post was.
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: jonpinson on May 28, 2011, 08:07:14 PM
Jon - both Rob and Nick at MH are podshavers to my knowledge? Not just sanders and sticker applying executives

Lets agree to disagree  :)
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: 100 not out on May 28, 2011, 08:15:40 PM
http://getahundred.com/blog/page/3

scroll down the page. . .

Nick looks more than a sander to me . . .
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: jonpinson on May 28, 2011, 08:18:05 PM
So why then do they buy in part mades?

Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: 100 not out on May 28, 2011, 08:27:20 PM
i think only Nick or Rob can answer that
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: Tom on May 30, 2011, 02:42:11 AM
I thought that tonight, it seems strange how last year the world and there wife was using one and now this use its dead out
Agree, it has gone quiet. Interested to see how Sky and Trescothick take to it in the upcoming T20s
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: 100 not out on May 30, 2011, 08:08:04 AM
In your time with them were the losses far greater than they had forecast
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: Bez013 on May 30, 2011, 09:16:59 AM
I've seen a couple being used this year by club players.

I think the difficulty is getting people to part with their hard earned cash for something different.  Maybe the marketing team should hold open days at indoor schools where people interested can wield a goose for 15 minutes against a bowling machine.

During the English T20 season we might see a bit more coverage if Trescothick, Blackwell etc. wield the bats effectively.
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: tim2000s on May 30, 2011, 09:19:52 AM
Is it perhaps that all those who have used them have not realised the expected benefits and gone back to the sponsors that pay more because the bat makes little difference?
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: Tom on May 30, 2011, 09:58:09 AM
Is it perhaps that all those who have used them have not realised the expected benefits and gone back to the sponsors that pay more because the bat makes little difference?
No.
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: 19reading87 on May 30, 2011, 10:07:03 AM
Are you still involved in any cricket companys Tom?
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: Tom on May 30, 2011, 10:17:04 AM
Are you still involved in any cricket companys Tom?
No, not at the moment.
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: Colesy on May 30, 2011, 10:55:36 AM
My friend is tempted to get an MMi3 and as he is really good at golf, might replicate this in his batting.
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: TheBoyLegend on May 30, 2011, 11:41:01 AM
I've seen a lot of corr3 models this year and 1 mmi in an evening friendly so I don't know if phase 2 of the goose master plan is working but it does seem their getting about in the southern area

I've had numerous conversations with guys at our club regarding them and consensus always seems to be people want to give one a go but would rather look to borrow one first to see what it would be like. Everytime one pops up on here I have to say I get the itch to purchase one but have always seemed to just miss out.



Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: jimba101 on May 30, 2011, 11:47:30 AM
Not seen a single one in action yet, MMi or Cor3.... cant say i even want to try one of the MMi's, wouldnt mind a Cor3 though
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: PedalsMcgrew on May 30, 2011, 01:42:47 PM
There was a chap using a Mongoose MMi in a pro 40 game on Sky a couple of weeks back. He flayed it to all parts....was the first I had seen this season though.
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: Number4 on May 30, 2011, 01:50:19 PM
My mate who I play with here in Aust has one of each. Bought them a bit over a year ago, he picked them up when he was in the uk on holidays. Both of these bats seriously are guns. Some of the biggest cleanest hitting I have seen was with the MMi
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: justnotcricket86 on May 30, 2011, 02:14:09 PM
Our skip has one and it is a rocket, I just found it quite hard to get on with!

Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: Liam-SCCC on May 30, 2011, 02:15:11 PM
I have seen a few and owned a Cor3, although not a standard one.

I would expect to see a lot of junior Mongoose bats being used in the Somerset area because of the Trescothick effect. Went up to Taunton last weekend and there were no SH bats, just 1 SM which I'm guessing is SSH? and there were loads of junior ones.
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: jonpinson on May 30, 2011, 03:27:09 PM
I should point out that one of the Worcester lads uses them, but then there is nowhere local that sells them.

Not our business and I doubt it is the sort of thing to ever be made public, but one thing that struck me as odd in last year's IPL was that although Mongoose got alot of air time, lots of mentions, the bats really didn't get used much. Was there perhaps a deal in place where Mongoose had paid for the focus to be on them?
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: Tom on May 30, 2011, 03:31:48 PM
AJ Knowles in Worcester central took stock this season, I remember posting it.
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: Tom on May 30, 2011, 03:33:12 PM
Not our business and I doubt it is the sort of thing to ever be made public, but one thing that struck me as odd in last year's IPL was that although Mongoose got alot of air time, lots of mentions, the bats really didn't get used much. Was there perhaps a deal in place where Mongoose had paid for the focus to be on them?
Besides paying Hayden to use it, who scored 93 in 1st outing with it. No.
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: jonpinson on May 30, 2011, 03:37:04 PM
Besides paying Hayden to use it, who scored 93 in 1st outing with it. No.

Interesting, thanks for taking the time to respond. From that then we can assume that the idea must have taken the eye of someone pretty high up in the organisation because the coverage you (they) got was pretty unprecedented in any sporting coverage.

I genuinely hope that this is just a quite period, a gathering of forces, rather than the start of a downward trend because although the brand concept does nothing for me, I admire anyone who has the balls to do it differently.
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: Tom on May 30, 2011, 03:40:28 PM
The coverage was unprecedented because it's incredibly rare to launch such a new radical looking product in any sport. When they do, it generates vast interest. An example is the Speedo swimsuit. Or even Nike with their Pink boots for Bendtner.

Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: jonpinson on May 30, 2011, 03:45:23 PM
The coverage was unprecedented because it's incredibly rare to launch such a new radical looking product in any sport. When they do, it generates vast interest. An example is the Speedo swimsuit. Or even Nike with their Pink boots for Bendtner.

I take your point but I think the Mongoose example was more prolific than either of those other two. I remember the furore about the swim suits but I couldn't have told you who made them.

I don't know how things stand with Mongoose at the moment and I have no wish to know, but I suppose you can look at it like this; If a brand can receive so much free advertising from a global brand like the IPL and still not be fruitful, perhaps it is an indication that the concept isn't viable.

Like I said though, I hope I'm wrong.
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: Nickauger on May 30, 2011, 05:20:48 PM
Do you think that it could be a similair thing to ayrteks (from how I understand). Although the product is proven to work, people may still not want to part with their hard earned cash in case they a) don't get on with it, or b) get the mick taken out of them by team-mates/opposition etc. for believing that something new might make them a better player. I would love to try one but not sure I could justify it until seeing the results first hand.
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: jonpinson on May 30, 2011, 06:02:10 PM
AJ Knowles in Worcester central took stock this season, I remember posting it.

Quite right, seemingly one of each of the low grade models both adult and junior. So 4 bats, all of which are long gone. So I guess it means they are selling.
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: jonpinson on May 30, 2011, 06:03:43 PM
Do you think that it could be a similair thing to ayrteks (from how I understand). Although the product is proven to work, people may still not want to part with their hard earned cash in case they a) don't get on with it, or b) get the mick taken out of them by team-mates/opposition etc. for believing that something new might make them a better player. I would love to try one but not sure I could justify it until seeing the results first hand.

By all accounts Ayrtek are getting busier by the day and the hardest part at the moment is trying to keep supply up with demand. :) Now they are being adopted by more and more counties people will be exposed to them more.
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: Tom on May 30, 2011, 06:04:59 PM
I don't know how things stand with Mongoose at the moment and I have no wish to know, but I suppose you can look at it like this; If a brand can receive so much free advertising from a global brand like the IPL and still not be fruitful, perhaps it is an indication that the concept isn't viable.
There's a little more to running a successful business than that.
Title: Re: Distinct lack of Mongoose
Post by: jonpinson on May 30, 2011, 06:06:58 PM
There's a little more to running a successful business than that.

 ;)
Of that I am in no doubt.