Custom Bats Cricket Forum

Forum News and Suggestions => Old Advertisers => Admin Board => It's Just Cricket => Topic started by: ItsJustCricket on January 11, 2016, 04:06:28 PM

Title: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: ItsJustCricket on January 11, 2016, 04:06:28 PM
Hello all,

I've just finished uploading the 2016 Phantom Softs to the website, and all I can say is wow!

They are not dissimilar to the H4L Custom softs, but come with a few tweaks which makes them even better in my opinion. For example, on the LE Type 1 gloves, Phantom uses a rounded 'U' split, whereas H4L uses the 'V' split. Further, the ring finger and pinkie have three splits, as opposed to two on the H4L custom gloves, which I think really increases flexibility. I also personally love the carbon detailing that's present - a subtle and classy touch. 

On the pads there are small tweaks, such as a deeper leather instep, a wider side wing, and a shorter top hat, so that it doesn't get in the way of the thigh pad, or the hands when batting.

I just cannot think of any other small brand who pays this much attention to their softs. These tiny tweaks are massively beneficial to the products, and proves how much Phantom cares about the end result. They don't, unlike some, just order in from the large manufacturers of softs, and stick their label on. It is a much more complete process then that. I also thought that of all places the forum would appreciate the effort gone to respond to customer feedback, and also make small, geeky changes like the ones I mentioned.

The best bit, for me, is that the kit is all priced lower than similar ranges from other brands. Just £70 for the gloves, and £90 for the pads, makes it an extremely attractive option!


But, in keeping with forum rules, I know these things don't exist without photos, so here are some!

Here are the Type 1 LE Gloves -

(http://i930.photobucket.com/albums/ad145/thebd11/unnamed%204.jpg) (http://s930.photobucket.com/user/thebd11/media/unnamed%204.jpg.html)

(http://i930.photobucket.com/albums/ad145/thebd11/unnamed%202.jpg) (http://s930.photobucket.com/user/thebd11/media/unnamed%202.jpg.html)

(http://i930.photobucket.com/albums/ad145/thebd11/unnamed%203.jpg) (http://s930.photobucket.com/user/thebd11/media/unnamed%203.jpg.html)

(http://i930.photobucket.com/albums/ad145/thebd11/unnamed%205.jpg) (http://s930.photobucket.com/user/thebd11/media/unnamed%205.jpg.html)



Here are the Type 2 LE Gloves -

(http://i930.photobucket.com/albums/ad145/thebd11/unnamed%206.jpg) (http://s930.photobucket.com/user/thebd11/media/unnamed%206.jpg.html)

(http://i930.photobucket.com/albums/ad145/thebd11/unnamed%2011.jpg) (http://s930.photobucket.com/user/thebd11/media/unnamed%2011.jpg.html)

(http://i930.photobucket.com/albums/ad145/thebd11/unnamed%2010.jpg) (http://s930.photobucket.com/user/thebd11/media/unnamed%2010.jpg.html)

(http://i930.photobucket.com/albums/ad145/thebd11/unnamed%208.jpg) (http://s930.photobucket.com/user/thebd11/media/unnamed%208.jpg.html)

(http://i930.photobucket.com/albums/ad145/thebd11/unnamed%209.jpg) (http://s930.photobucket.com/user/thebd11/media/unnamed%209.jpg.html)


Finally, the LE 2016 Pads. I love these!
(http://i930.photobucket.com/albums/ad145/thebd11/unnamed%2019.jpg) (http://s930.photobucket.com/user/thebd11/media/unnamed%2019.jpg.html)

(http://i930.photobucket.com/albums/ad145/thebd11/unnamed%2017.jpg) (http://s930.photobucket.com/user/thebd11/media/unnamed%2017.jpg.html)

(http://i930.photobucket.com/albums/ad145/thebd11/unnamed%2018.jpg) (http://s930.photobucket.com/user/thebd11/media/unnamed%2018.jpg.html)

(http://i930.photobucket.com/albums/ad145/thebd11/unnamed%2015.jpg) (http://s930.photobucket.com/user/thebd11/media/unnamed%2015.jpg.html)

(http://i930.photobucket.com/albums/ad145/thebd11/unnamed%2016.jpg) (http://s930.photobucket.com/user/thebd11/media/unnamed%2016.jpg.html)


Thanks for looking,

CBD

Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: WalkingWicket37 on January 11, 2016, 04:09:33 PM
All of the links are coming up with 404 Error - Page not found
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: ItsJustCricket on January 11, 2016, 04:11:18 PM
Apologies, let's see if this works. These are the links to the Website.

Type 1 LE Gloves - http://www.itsjustcricket.co.uk/cricket-batting-gloves-c20/senior-batting-gloves-c21/phantom-cricket-2016-limited-edition-type-1-batting-gloves-p1257 (http://www.itsjustcricket.co.uk/cricket-batting-gloves-c20/senior-batting-gloves-c21/phantom-cricket-2016-limited-edition-type-1-batting-gloves-p1257)

Type 2 LE Gloves - http://www.itsjustcricket.co.uk/cricket-batting-gloves-c20/senior-batting-gloves-c21/phantom-cricket-2016-limited-edition-type-2-batting-gloves-p1258 (http://www.itsjustcricket.co.uk/cricket-batting-gloves-c20/senior-batting-gloves-c21/phantom-cricket-2016-limited-edition-type-2-batting-gloves-p1258)

LE Pads - http://www.itsjustcricket.co.uk/cricket-batting-pads-c7/senior-batting-pads-c23/phantom-cricket-limited-edition-2016-batting-pads-p1256 (http://www.itsjustcricket.co.uk/cricket-batting-pads-c7/senior-batting-pads-c23/phantom-cricket-limited-edition-2016-batting-pads-p1256)

Hopefully that should work?

CBD
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: WalkingWicket37 on January 11, 2016, 04:14:26 PM
Cheers Chris

Until I saw it was £70 for a pair of gloves I was interested in these, you can get a decent 2nd hand bat and an hour in some nearby nets for that!

I currently work with a Yorkshirewoman and I can see her view on money is rubbing off on me haha  :-[
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: RoCo Da Pixie on January 11, 2016, 04:14:47 PM
Crikey £160 for the mums and dads.

It has been a few seasons since I have purchased some but that is steep.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: liscon12 on January 11, 2016, 04:15:48 PM
I can see the pics fine.

I saw they had released images of thier 2016 on Twitter last night I think. They look good all the softs this year I especially like the quilted stitching on the back of the top hat. It would appear going back to all white classic look is the fashion this year which I totally love btw :)
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: ItsJustCricket on January 11, 2016, 04:17:16 PM
Without naming other brands, think of kit which is similar, but costs more, that the forum raved about! That was my point. Not cheap, but exceptional value for money!

CBD
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: RoCo Da Pixie on January 11, 2016, 04:19:14 PM
Without naming other brands, think of kit which is similar, but costs more, that the forum raved about! That was my point. Not cheap, but exceptional value for money!

CBD

Personally I haven't paid attention to any of the prices of other brands. If they are on the cheap side of other brands then softs have gone through the rough. I got top of the range Newbery softs for £100 for the pair. They were the SPS range.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: tommo256 on January 11, 2016, 04:28:35 PM
But then another brand which is very similar has cheaper kit so.....
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: liscon12 on January 11, 2016, 04:29:42 PM
Why are brands choosing to use splits for their top of the line gloves and demoting the sausage style to the cheaper end of the scale? This is the case for quite a lot of the brands we see and is not intended as a dig at Phantom but rather just a question in general.

I presume its because it takes more time to produce splits over sausage hence the price increase.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: WalkingWicket37 on January 11, 2016, 04:36:21 PM
Without naming other brands, think of kit which is similar, but costs more, that the forum raved about! That was my point. Not cheap, but exceptional value for money!

CBD

There's no denying these are top quality softs, but I can't see many people being willing to spend that amount. I may well be wrong, but I struggle paying £40 for a pair of gloves!
What happened to the "good ol' days" when you could get a top of the range bat and matching softs for £250 lol
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: ItsJustCricket on January 11, 2016, 04:40:26 PM
I think this has moved into a discussion about the market as a whole. Working in the retailing industry, I can tell you these are certainly in line, or even better than that, with the rest of the market.

Surprised at the lack of comments about the kit itself!

CBD
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: JG on January 11, 2016, 04:44:30 PM
Everything is increasing in price nowadays, especially with the big names in cricket and understandably it has filtered down to the smaller brands too! But looking at these, I'd still be inclined to get AT LEAST a pair of each, gorgeous kit and the classic all white design is in itself a beauty to behold. Hope it makes a bigger comeback with a lot of other brands!
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: edge on January 11, 2016, 05:22:04 PM
Am I the only one who thinks the understated white with some black details is a bit boring? Particularly from smaller brands - if I did decide to get a set of 'classic' looking softs, I'd buy blank ones, or go for a classic company like GN or Salix, or the Manufacturer that meH not be named. Don't see the point in buying minimally branded softs at top prices (sorry Chris, I don't pay much attention to softs pricing but £70 for a set of gloves is a sign of the world going mad, most I've ever paid is £50 and that was an extravagant sale buy).
Think it would look very strange as a combination using whited out softs with a loud in your face bat like a Phantom or H4L too. Where have all the lairy interesting softs gone? Bat stickers are getting louder and louder, and softs getting whiter and whiter every year it seems, apart from certain very small brands.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: JB on January 11, 2016, 05:55:57 PM
I think these look awesome, the effort that has obviously been put into the design is definitely worth it!! I'm a fan of plain softs, just got the B&S ones that are a similar style but a lot plainer. As for price, if they are £20 more expensive than a different set its only the price of a takeaway.

The problem with lairy coloured softs is that if you have 20 bats (which should be a minimum after a year on the forum) then you are going to get clashes between stickers and softs. If you have quite plain softs then you can take whichever bat from the collection and still look good getting a duck  ;)
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: jd163 on January 11, 2016, 06:51:08 PM
Type 2 LE Gloves looks stunning but too expensive.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: uknsaunders on January 11, 2016, 07:01:39 PM
For top of the range gloves then £70 is fair enough. Would I pay £70 for gloves, nope. My price ceiling was £25 and I blew that out of the water when I paid £40 odd for some h4l ones. Good luck to IJC/phantom, the gloves look great.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: StillNotOut on January 11, 2016, 07:02:29 PM
Stunning softs. Not something I would be able to afford tho! Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: liscon12 on January 11, 2016, 07:03:28 PM
Oh I think I've made a boo boo, both pairs of gloves are 70 pounds, I assumed the Type 2 were cheaper.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: SOULMAN1012 on January 11, 2016, 07:36:01 PM
Design wise the pads are lovely, yes they are minimal branding, all white but have some subtle styling bits and pieces that look class, love the inner top hat with cross stitch and phantom logo and all leather instep is quality and always would rather have this than not.

But I will say as others have the price is just mental. This may have nothing to do with it for may but to charge £160 for softs from a what is essentially a sticker up other bats brand is mental. I would rather pay over the odds for softs from another brand if that brand I knew handmade all there bats, had a business premises to fund and trained and spent time with others that would like to learn the trade. I say this as I know these days the amount of mark up on the bats is not as good as it was.

As I say others may say that has nothing to do with it. All softs pretty much come from same price and basically are the same materials, Velcro, pittard leather, leather etc. But personally for me it does make a difference. I know Phantom are honest about what they do etc but I just think those prices are to much. But that's just my point of view.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Maverick79 on January 11, 2016, 07:49:06 PM
I own two Phantom bats, a set of last years LE pads and two pairs of gloves which I love in terms of quality, look and comfort. The new ones look epic but I could simply not justify £160 on a set of softs. The price of softs seems to have gone mental with some brands (big brands as well as smaller independent companies) asking around £100 for a pair of pads.

The way things are heading, if we are not careful in a few seasons time we could be looking at £200 for a set of top range softs
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: wayward_hayward on January 11, 2016, 08:04:47 PM
My views will probably echo previous posts, great looking gear but top end soft prices seem to be going through the roof. While all bought second hand (but in excellent condition), I own Kookaburra Pro Issue,  Norfolk top end RR softs and Puma top end softs and the combined price was around the same price as new set of Phantom softs.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: WalkingWicket37 on January 11, 2016, 08:46:36 PM
I think these look awesome, the effort that has obviously been put into the design is definitely worth it!! I'm a fan of plain softs, just got the B&S ones that are a similar style but a lot plainer. As for price, if they are £20 more expensive than a different set its only the price of a takeaway.
I'm a fat git, so for me it's a no brainier to get the cheaper gloves and spend the difference on a ruby murray!

The problem with lairy coloured softs is that if you have 20 bats (which should be a minimum after a year on the forum) then you are going to get clashes between stickers and softs. If you have quite plain softs then you can take whichever bat from the collection and still look good getting a duck  ;)
You could go the other way and find the brightest gloves and pads you can (preferably in totally different colours) so no matter what bat you use you'd look like a peacock that got caught in a nuclear explosion  :D
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: springbok45 on January 11, 2016, 08:47:21 PM
The softs are nice but seem, to me, fairly generic with little  to differentiate them from other brands that use the same supplier, other than the cost. Both glove models seem to be available else where at 20-35 quid cheaper

Personally I find the trend for plain all white sorts very boring and to my mind it seems quite a lazy design, the accountant in me thinks it's probably more a cost saving than fashion statement, having read Toms blogs about his time at Mongoose the idea of using all the bat range colours in the soft designs makes more sense from a branding point than minimal badges and monotone colouring.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: ItsJustCricket on January 11, 2016, 09:09:28 PM
Where do I start?

Phantom is not a sticker brand! Do you call Kookaburra a sticker brand? Slazenger? Sure they don't make their bats, but they are so so much more, and the number of times I've read that has made me want to tear my hear out!

In reply to the claim they aren't different. Eh? Didn't you read my post. The carbon detailing, the extra split on the last two fingers, the u splits, the smaller top hat on the pads, the larger side wing on the pads etc etc. That seems very different!

I just find it interesting how everyone raved about the H4L custom range - which is an incredible range, and no one really mentioned the price there, despite them being MORE EXPENSIVE. That is what seems a little bit strange to me!
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: WalkingWicket37 on January 11, 2016, 09:17:25 PM
Where do I start?

Phantom is not a sticker brand! Do you call Kookaburra a sticker brand? Slazenger? Sure they don't make their bats, but they are so so much more, and the number of times I've read that has made me want to tear my hear out!
Can you elaborate on the "so so much more" is to the uninformed please?
And if you do tear your hair out we expect at least pictures, preferably a video!  ;)


In reply to the claim they aren't different. Eh? Didn't you read my post. The carbon detailing, the extra split on the last two fingers, the u splits, the smaller top hat on the pads, the larger side wing on the pads etc etc. That seems very different!
I think there is only so much you can change with gloves and pads. You did explain the differences, but a quick glance at any pair of gloves or pads and they'd look similar. The differences you listed are in the "micro detail" which isn't obviously apparent having just a quick look. We are all guilty on the forum of not reading posts, just looking at pictures and hitting reply, I think that's the case here.

I just find it interesting how everyone raved about the H4L custom range - which is an incredible range, and no one really mentioned the price there, despite them being MORE EXPENSIVE. That is what seems a little bit strange to me!
We are a strange bunch on here, I think anyone who spends any amount of time on here will vouch for that  :D
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: SOULMAN1012 on January 11, 2016, 09:24:30 PM
Where do I start?

Phantom is not a sticker brand! Do you call Kookaburra a sticker brand? Slazenger? Sure they don't make their bats, but they are so so much more, and the number of times I've read that has made me want to tear my hear out!

In reply to the claim they aren't different. Eh? Didn't you read my post. The carbon detailing, the extra split on the last two fingers, the u splits, the smaller top hat on the pads, the larger side wing on the pads etc etc. That seems very different!

I just find it interesting how everyone raved about the H4L custom range - which is an incredible range, and no one really mentioned the price there, despite them being MORE EXPENSIVE. That is what seems a little bit strange to me!

I'm my mind they are a sticker brand. Kook is slightly different but again yes in essence I guess they are. I also didn't say this was a bad thing as they are honest about not making there own bats. But they are a brand that apply stickers to pre made bats. As has been asked I do wonder why they are so much more?

For the record I think the H4L prices for softs is mental as I do for GN legends, kook players etc as well.

Also this not a dig at you or IJC I would have said the same about any brand charging that amount for softs, my only justification was that if you make your own bats and have all the full costs associated with that I may consider the purchase but still would t spend that amount on softs.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: ItsJustCricket on January 11, 2016, 09:28:13 PM
Ok I will elaborate.

The difference, we feel, between sticker uppers and a company like Phantom or Kooks, Slazenger is about control over the whole process.

We stocked sticker upper bats in the past - Mars, CP, Piri Piri etc. And they didn't have any control over the manufacturing process. They could request some very generic shapes and then have a huge batch made up, and simply sticker them up, as the name suggests.

However, Phantom has complete control. This is evidenced by the close working relationship with the bat maker, for example at short notice they produced a run of fuller Illusion bats, a change in shape mid season for a limited batch of only ten or so, which other companies could not do. They also offer fully custom bats, something which many sticker up brands simply cannot do.

Phantom designs everything about the bats, the stickers, chooses the grips, the shapes, absolutely everything. I don't see why because they don't make them they are intrinsically any worse, or worthy of less support, as has been suggested? Surely, having an established and world-renowned bat maker making the bats is only a good thing? Especially as Phantom are open about the whole thing.

My point being, they have control over everything. Literally the only thing they don't do is make the bats. And I don't think that's a bad thing whatsoever.

Yes, but they are micro details, which is proof that they are different from a lot of brands. Most brands like you said just get stock designs off softs manufacturers. Phantom don't. And I've given evidence of that.

Yes a strange, and I would say unfair, bunch we are. Just seems harsh to me to not even mention the price of other gloves, and rave about them, when a very similar, some would say better, glove comes on here and is cheaper. It seems some people have let their views about the brand sway their opinion of what are simply incredible softs!

CBD.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: northernboy1987 on January 11, 2016, 09:38:30 PM
Not that my opinion counts for much but I think, if there is a bias, it's more of a case of the majority on the forum (myself included) particularly loving H4L rather than particularly disliking Phantom, they are a sponsor of the forum and more members have had dealings, either directly or through someone like yourselves or Vitas, with H4L than they have with Phantom.

I for one think both ranges look class but are, like GN Legends etc. getting a bit mental on price now, but that is, as you said a reflection on the market as a whole.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: edge on January 11, 2016, 09:38:55 PM
I'm not a fan of the white H4L ones either, does that help? ;)
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Tom on January 11, 2016, 09:39:26 PM
Clearly a well made soft, and price wise they're in line with the market with the exception of sale stock. Just missing the finishing touches that I think the H4L had over it.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: simonmay5 on January 11, 2016, 09:40:36 PM
As you know I really like phantom bats and their softs do look very good and the quality will be first class the one thing I would say I feel they copy a lot off their range on others like the stickers was very close to affinity cricket and now the softs very similar to h4l gear it would be nice for them to have maybe their own designs rather than copying others I know they tweaked the design but are still very close to others
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: windyroad on January 11, 2016, 09:42:36 PM
Surely the price of the GN legend at eighty pounds reflects that money they need to recoup from sponsorship advertising etc.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: SOULMAN1012 on January 11, 2016, 09:45:55 PM
Ok I will elaborate.

The difference, we feel, between sticker uppers and a company like Phantom or Kooks, Slazenger is about control over the whole process.

We stocked sticker upper bats in the past - Mars, CP, Piri Piri etc. And they didn't have any control over the manufacturing process. They could request some very generic shapes and then have a huge batch made up, and simply sticker them up, as the name suggests.

However, Phantom has complete control. This is evidenced by the close working relationship with the bat maker, for example at short notice they produced a run of fuller Illusion bats, a change in shape mid season for a limited batch of only ten or so, which other companies could not do. They also offer fully custom bats, something which many sticker up brands simply cannot do.

Phantom designs everything about the bats, the stickers, chooses the grips, the shapes, absolutely everything. I don't see why because they don't make them they are intrinsically any worse, or worthy of less support, as has been suggested? Surely, having an established and world-renowned bat maker making the bats is only a good thing? Especially as Phantom are open about the whole thing.

My point being, they have control over everything. Literally the only thing they don't do is make the bats. And I don't think that's a bad thing whatsoever.

Yes, but they are micro details, which is proof that they are different from a lot of brands. Most brands like you said just get stock designs off softs manufacturers. Phantom don't. And I've given evidence of that.

Yes a strange, and I would say unfair, bunch we are. Just seems harsh to me to not even mention the price of other gloves, and rave about them, when a very similar, some would say better, glove comes on here and is cheaper. It seems some people have let their views about the brand sway their opinion of what are simply incredible softs!

CBD.

Chris, thank you for taking the time to share your views and eloborate on why in your view Phantom are different. I do see what you are saying and agree that because you don't and for most it's simply that they can't make there own bats. Firstly it's a very skilled trade and secondly to make your own bats the start up costs are going to be high. The fact they have full control over there brand and can produce limited runs of custom shapes and have full say over quality control is good. I wasn't trying to say they were like a bedroom brand buy the way.

Look people have favoured brands etc, my point of view was purely that in my mind if the costs of these softs and those mentioned from other brands is not a good thing for cricket, the price of willow has increased a lot over the past 5 years and there is some justification for this due to the weather and how many trees have been damaged over the last few winters and simply demand. Softs no doubt have increased in price as per everything in the world but I can not seen how to the point of £90-£100 for pads and £70-£90 for gloves. A person can create from scratch a fully customised bat on here for far less than softs and that's mad.
I have no doubt Phantom softs will sell well for you, and again thank you for sharing your views and thoughts and plus accept this it is which isn't a criticism of IJC of indeed Phantom just my view on the pricing.

Thanks
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: ItsJustCricket on January 11, 2016, 09:51:57 PM
As you know I really like phantom bats and their softs do look very good and the quality will be first class the one thing I would say I feel they copy a lot off their range on others like the stickers was very close to affinity cricket and now the softs very similar to h4l gear it would be nice for them to have maybe their own designs rather than copying others I know they tweaked the design but are still very close to others

Simon, I understand this completely. However, when I spoke to Aftab about this, he said that he has lost count of the amount of times he has asked the manufacturer for something different, only to be told they can't do it, or to receive poor quality samples. He said he simply wouldn't put out some of the stuff they sent him, even if it was closer in design to something different and entirely his own.

Thus he, correctly in my opinion, opted to take a design the manufacturer did well, and tweak it. You mention the softs are similar to H4L gear, and they are, but I must stress that this isn't a H4L design. it is one of the designs that the manufacturer is able to do well. Phantom did not copy H4L. Just because the H4L softs were available a little earlier is not relevant to that particular point. I think Phantom made the right design to produce a very high quality glove with minor tweaks, rather than a completely new glove which may have been shoddy in areas.

CBD
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: WalkingWicket37 on January 11, 2016, 09:59:50 PM
Chris

Thank you for taking the time to explain why you feel Phantom is more than just a sticker up brand. I appreciate that you have done this (and I am sure others do too).

I'm not sure if our wires have got crossed here or not but just to be clear, I did not make the micro detail comment as a criticism - it was in fact a compliment and you have reiterated my point with your response (which seems to have taken something of a defensive tone).

Having had a look back at the original post I think there is a reason H4Ls pricing received no comment because they only initially unveiled the product, not the cost! Personally I think anyone charging more than £40 for gloves is taking the piddle so my feedback would be the same for any brand charging what I call silly prices for softs.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: liscon12 on January 11, 2016, 10:09:46 PM
Specifically softs chat from now on then? I like the look of the pads and the sausage fingers have pittards which is something many people are crying out for which can only be a bonus
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: ItsJustCricket on January 11, 2016, 10:17:11 PM
My point in a general sense is that not many brands invent there own gloves.

Of many of the most loved gloves on the forum, of which I won't name names since I'm a retailer, I could show you the exact glove they have been copied off, and simply changed the colour. These would be many leading brands which are very loved on the forum. You'd be surprised.

So I'm just pleased Phantom have made any effort, and it's quite a big effort, to be unique. So many gloves nowadays are just the same as others. Based on 2 or 3 stock designs with different colours. Like I said, I won't, because I can't, but trust me that Phantom are among the most unique out there!

@liscon12 Yes, something Amos mentioned in his latest blog, the lack of sausage finger and Pittards palm options. Check out that blog! www.itsjustcricket.news (http://www.itsjustcricket.news)

CBD
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on January 11, 2016, 10:25:48 PM
The issue is we live in a micro climate in the forum and Due to the knowledge base members typically have they are reluctant to pay the going rate for products as they are aware with some digging they can source the product in a similar guise for cheaper elsewhere.

Only a small percentage of sales from sponsors on here occur at a price without any discount I'd imagine.

For brands such as Phantom to survive in the retail environment there needs to be a higher RRP when you take into account the people needing to make a margin on the products to want a living and cover overheads associated with running a business.

We are very spoilt on here by having access to very competitively priced goods at far less than retail and typically closer to trade prices!

Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Northern monkey on January 11, 2016, 10:30:23 PM
i like the phantom softs
Don't have a problem with the price, for what looks a quality offering,from a young company trying to offer quality products, excellent review by the way

I paid over 70quid years ago for top end slazenger gloves, so prices not that different
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: ItsJustCricket on January 11, 2016, 10:33:41 PM
@Ayrtek. Agreed. We hardly make any money on lots of the stuff we sell on the forum. Discounts, free knocking in, free shipping. We barely cover costs largely, and so you can't expect companies to survive!

If we only catered to the forum we simply wouldn't be able to put food on the table or pay our mortgages! I don't think many people realise that!
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: WalkingWicket37 on January 11, 2016, 10:36:11 PM
Just Playing devil's advocate here, how is changing the split from a V shape to a U shape different to changing the colour?
Is it not the same principal, taking the design of an existing glove and making small changes so they are your own...
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: liscon12 on January 11, 2016, 10:37:09 PM
Personally I didn't see any issue with the price when I first saw the post, all the top brands are charging 100+ for pads and around 70+ for gloves. If the big boys are doing it why not Phantom, I bet the attention to detail is far superior when designing these products as the range is so small meaning more time spent on then and the fact that in a crowded market you have to go that extra mile just to make them stand out above the rest. Overall these look far better than last years range which can only be a good thing.

Are they planning on bringing out a mid-range product line Chris?
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: ItsJustCricket on January 11, 2016, 10:38:52 PM
Just Playing devil's advocate here, how is changing the split from a V shape to a U shape different to changing the colour?
Is it not the same principal, taking the design of an existing glove and making small changes so they are your own...

Because it is a thoughtful change which impacts the glove in a positive way. Phantom believe that the flexibility and protection on a U split is better than on a V split.

Whereas, changing the colour makes no difference to the glove at all.

Hopefully that makes sense - one is a change made to benefit the glove, the other is not really anything other than rebranding another company's gloves without improving or changing them.

CBD
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: ch1p on January 11, 2016, 11:06:40 PM
Anybody else with a carbon fibre fetish here? I love it on the gloves - surprised but wish more brands went with some carbon look in their ranges....
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on January 11, 2016, 11:23:18 PM
Never liked if myself 😜
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: edge on January 11, 2016, 11:30:44 PM
It doesn't even look like carbon fibre...
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: bostoncricketer on January 12, 2016, 03:08:27 AM
These are some of the best looking softs I have seen so far this season. The chrome branding looks absolutely fabulous and top class. Having said that, I would never buy them as I am bit of a cheapskate when it comes to softs. I would rather compromise on the design a little bit, get a cheaper Asian brand for half the price and put the rest of the money towards a bat :)
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: roco on January 12, 2016, 08:16:44 AM
Hmmmm without picking on Phantom for this price I would be expecting some top protection from these gloves but I bet they are similar to other top of the range gloves (Spartan, gm, new H4L) and just foam/cotton in them to get weight down.

Look nice design but unless they have the inserts the old H4l hattori and my current Vulcan ones have I can't see why brands charge so much for gloves.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Wickets-then-runs on January 12, 2016, 08:22:58 AM
I love the look of them: classy and understated! Not outrageously priced compared to here in Aust!
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Mel Jessop on January 12, 2016, 09:12:04 PM
Very very nice looking softs in my opinion, slightly cheaper than some top end, much more than some lower end products.

Would I buy? No, but I wouldn't buy h4l or any other manufacturers at that price, simply put I am a tight arsed family man from Yorkshire (that should say it all), I bought new softs this year but last year's design from B & S, a very good bundle deal for £80 with a duffle thrown in, plenty good enough for me.

Will they sell well, absolutely, due to looking nice and the need for many cricket nerds to have the latest or matching kit.

They look lovely, and if money was no object I would buy, but I am afraid this forum has cost me to much already on bats since the end of last season lol...
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: hilly_2015 on January 12, 2016, 09:14:07 PM
All 3 are fantastic (the design of them especially!) and I would love one day to be buying gloves / pads like this, but unfortunately these are way out of my price range and I tend to go through softs very quickly.

With that in mind, I'd always go for the cheaper option.

EDIT: @Mel Jessop put it better than I ever could.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: hanif on January 28, 2016, 02:13:30 AM
I think Aftab has done a great job with the softs. This is not a new design and I have seen a few companies with similar. Aftab has taken the design to the next level for me. Like what AMG do to a normal Mercedes saloon. Look similar from a distance but get close and it is a different beast all together. These gloves are up there with my favourites (H4L).
As for price, there are a lot of cost involved with softs and the margins are very small you guys would be surprised how little is made on soft goods. I think if corners were cut to try and make them cheaper they would just not have the same impact or appeal. If you want the best then I don't think there are any better softs than the phantom and H4L ones.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Nmcgee on January 29, 2016, 04:02:33 AM
Hanif, if you're charging 70pounds on gloves and making very small profit margins, I would say there is something wrong with your business model. Either that or I would ask how you define "small margins".
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Neon Cricket on January 29, 2016, 09:10:12 AM
Hanif, if you're charging 70pounds on gloves and making very small profit margins, I would say there is something wrong with your business model. Either that or I would ask how you define "small margins".

Knowing the cost price of these softs, I have to agree. There's is plenty of markup involved I can assure you - for someone like H4L where the business is their whole livelihood I can fully understand, after all they have numerous other expenses to pay for business wise (and thats before you get to any personal expense/profit!!) but I'm under the presumption that this isn't Phantom's one and only source of income which for me is a sticking point.

But then again, if other companies are going to charge top whack then why shouldn't Phantom! Bit of a vicious circle for the consumer sadly.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: uknsaunders on January 29, 2016, 09:27:28 AM
Two things here:-

1. If the gloves are sold to retailers then there is a % on a %. If the gloves cost £30 to manufacture, then for Phantom to make any money out of retail they will stick a margin on and sell at £50 to the retailers who then stick there margin on. I'm exaggerating here but you get the idea it might be £50 cost, £55 for phantom to the retailers and £70 retail, by the time vat is taken then small profits are a few pounds.

2. As a consequence  Phantom will "hold" their prices at retailer prices - therefore making a decent profit.

What the retailers make is determined by Phantom, the cost of the glove and what margin the retailer can afford to make, presumably below RRP.


I'm sure you can buy blanks at OLS for alot less but the cost of branding and the other touches will mean you couldn't get the same glove.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: JB on January 29, 2016, 09:29:51 AM
Two things here:-

1. If the gloves are sold to retailers then there is a % on a %. If the gloves cost £30 to manufacture, then for Phantom to make any money they will stick a margin on and sell at £50 to the retailers who then stick there margin on. I'm exaggerating here but you get the idea it might be £50 cost, £55 for phantom to the retailers and £70 retail, by the time vat is taken then small profits are a few pounds.

2. As a consequence  Phantom will "hold" their prices at retailer prices - therefore making a decent profit.

What the retailers make is determined by Phantom, the cost of the glove and what margin the retailer can afford to make, presumably below RRP.
the cost of the glove.

I'm sure you can buy blanks at OLS for alot less but the cost of branding and the other touches will mean you couldn't get the same glove.

And if you take into account the quantities that are going to be sold, say 100 pairs? He's not making himself a millionaire out of it
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: WalkingWicket37 on January 29, 2016, 12:02:16 PM
Attractive kit yes, attractive pricing? Not for me. Can think of far more attractive things to spend £160 on  :D :o

You can get 5 lap dances and 2 drinks on a Saturday night for that!
Apparently....  :-[
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Neon Cricket on January 29, 2016, 04:36:08 PM
You can get 5 lap dances and 2 drinks on a Saturday night for that!
Apparently....  :-[

Jesus, hate to think what you've been 'enjoying' at £30 a pop! haha
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: hanif on January 30, 2016, 12:54:50 AM
If phantom cricket was selling direct to customers then he would be making a decent profit, but he is distributing to retailers, so in affect he is splitting his profit. So the margins after all expenses would be relatively small. In the current market I still feel they offer very good value, as they look top quality.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: WalkingWicket37 on February 07, 2016, 05:17:29 PM
I just spotted this picture in the for sale section, I think I'll just leave it here...  ;)

(http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160205/cf02075c7765d95ffe0359fc1abb87a8.jpg)

(http://i930.photobucket.com/albums/ad145/thebd11/unnamed%204.jpg) (http://s930.photobucket.com/user/thebd11/media/unnamed%204.jpg.html)
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: simonmay5 on February 07, 2016, 05:28:30 PM
I just spotted this picture in the for sale section, I think I'll just leave it here...  ;)

([url]http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160205/cf02075c7765d95ffe0359fc1abb87a8.jpg[/url])

([url]http://i930.photobucket.com/albums/ad145/thebd11/unnamed%204.jpg[/url]) ([url]http://s930.photobucket.com/user/thebd11/media/unnamed%204.jpg.html[/url])




Must say they do look very similar just would like phantom to come up with something that was fresh to the market rather than copy everyone else
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: smilley792 on February 07, 2016, 05:34:55 PM
Is there really anything different that can be done with softs? Most ideas have been done and when your to extreme or away from the norm. Every Mong will claim that they'll get sledged and have to cry themselves to sleep at night.


Put in the fact they've gone for a clean whit Elohim. They look like another 100 pair off gloves out there on the market. BORING!!
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: simonmay5 on February 07, 2016, 05:46:42 PM
Is there really anything different that can be done with softs? Most ideas have been done and when your to extreme or away from the norm. Every Mong will claim that they'll get sledged and have to cry themselves to sleep at night.


Put in the fact they've gone for a clean whit Elohim. They look like another 100 pair off gloves out there on the market. BORING!!


I do agree with what your saying but would like to see something new to the market rather than same as everyone else.affinity did it with using a bit of towel on the thumb of their gloves so you could wipe the sweat of just something different would be nice
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on February 07, 2016, 05:51:45 PM
With softs making a new design means producing in the region of 15/20 pairs as samples to pin down the design and give the manufacturer the chance to perfect the design.

When we were with CCC and ordered 600 pairs of gloves in our new shark tooth design (something I came up with from scratch as part of my dissertation) only 2 people in the factory were capable of making them due to their skill level. This meant producing the 600 pairs between them took nearly 2 months based upon their daily production capacity.

With tweaking existing designs with the odd shape change in the top part etc to make them look aesthetically different to another it means "smaller" brands can piggy back off the back of the fact the manufacturer has already worked out any issues with the production process and your not having to pay for R&D work as part of it.

There's the possibility of being unique...its just comes at a cost.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: dcullen8 on February 07, 2016, 05:58:39 PM
Im not particularly fussed on aesthetics, plainish white split fingers do me just fine. However something like the towelling on the affinitys is just ideal.

Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Kevtheplumber on February 07, 2016, 06:07:12 PM
I get most of my softs from online stockist. Team placed big order. I got some sausage Dhoni gloves that are as good as anything I've tried on for £24 and today I used the unbranded splits that were £14. Was so impressed I'll likely use these now for matches


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Kevtheplumber on February 07, 2016, 06:09:53 PM
(http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160207/1fc950f9f9e3dd3d33d030297bc6acf7.jpg)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Woodyspin on February 07, 2016, 06:27:58 PM
([url]http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160207/1fc950f9f9e3dd3d33d030297bc6acf7.jpg[/url])


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How did you find the unbrandad mate?
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Kevtheplumber on February 07, 2016, 06:46:54 PM
Brilliant. Got a pair of Ss pads 2 years back and still going strong at £30. Old gloves are still fine but as I was ordering for club at those prices I couldn't not. At £15 I was going to just net in them but might swap round now


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: EaglesCC on February 08, 2016, 01:50:06 PM
Hello everybody!

It's been a while since I posted on here - been busy with other things as you might have noticed ;). I must admit, I have resisted replying to this thread before as this is after all a place to form and share opinions - so keep them coming.

Now, I have to say this is not intended to be a defensive post by any means (sometimes the written tone can come across that way). I am not adverse to a bit of criticism - however, most if not all of the much loved brands on the forum could be painted with the same brush when it comes to softs - but they're not!

The Salix gloves is an exact copy of the SS Gladiator from a few years back with a change in colour scheme - look it up!

These gloves also look familiar don't you think?!

(http://www.cricketequipmentusa.com/content/images/thumbs/0001911_ss_cricket_batting_gloves_gladiator_pro_9_by_sunridges.jpeg)

(http://www.prodirectcricket.com/productimages/V3_1_Main/91632.jpg)

That is not to say small brands don't experiment or try new things (I certainly do), but the majority go with a colour variations of existing designs as the running of a brand is pretty involved so doing development year on year means something has to give elsewhere. The rest is down to costs and timing. The logistics of releasing products (on this occasion delayed due to experimenting with new designs) means that the general public often get to see one product sooner than the other which contributes to the opinion they form about it (as well as their existing association with the other brand).

Innovation in this industry is virtually nonexistent, change is often reactive rather than proactive. Occasionally someone sticks their head above the parapet only for it to be shot at. Those willing to be different also have to accept the high chances of failure - now given the costs involved in R&D, that could potentially break a small brand. The majority of the market wants something familiar, the small proportion who don't are not usually worth the investment. The general public don't have an appreciation for the pitfalls and challenges when dealing with manufacturers abroad (some highlighted by Tom) - often the limitations are not in the minds of the brands, but the ability/ willingness of the manufacturer. In short, there is far more to this than meets the eye.

It may come as no surprise to some of you that (with the exception of some), small brands often talk to each other - they share experiences, tips, tricks, suppliers, etc etc. and are probably less concerned about brands sharing designs than the people on here. (despite his link to Affinity, Tom has been the voice of reason here).

Price will always be difficult to convince customers on but anyone making a comparison between buying an unseen, unbranded product direct from India versus being able to touch and feel a product at a local retail store simply does not understand the logistics involved. Customers are also willing to place a value on a trusted relationship with a retailer - as an example, customers place pre-orders for Phantom products through ItsJustCricket when they can just as easily do it through Phantom directly. Customers want to buy these products from local retailers and therefore the price point has to take into consideration a number of factors - not least that sometimes financial loss is difficult to predict (replacement of damaged items/ loss in transit/ theft). Financial investment and margin structures vary massively between suppliers and retailers too therefore comparisons are difficult.

Anyone who has attempted to do this before will know that starting a brand is the easy part, running a brand is demanding but the true test is in making a brand a successful and viable business. I have the utmost respect for all brands but in particular small successful brands - their challenge is not just the big brands but also the perceptions of customers who often only see a fraction of the effort that has gone into getting a product on a shelf.

Phantom have only just started on this journey and we are most certainly not claiming to know it all or be better than anyone else.


Thanks for reading.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Ridenmarke on February 08, 2016, 02:05:51 PM
Hello everybody!

It's been a while since I posted on here - been busy with other things as you might have noticed ;). I must admit, I have resisted replying to this thread before as this is after all a place to form and share opinions - so keep them coming.

Now, I have to say this is not intended to be a defensive post by any means (sometimes the written tone can come across that way). I am not adverse to a bit of criticism - however, most if not all of the much loved brands on the forum could be painted with the same brush when it comes to softs - but they're not!

The Salix gloves is an exact copy of the SS Gladiator from a few years back with a change in colour scheme - look it up!

These gloves also look familiar don't you think?!

([url]http://www.cricketequipmentusa.com/content/images/thumbs/0001911_ss_cricket_batting_gloves_gladiator_pro_9_by_sunridges.jpeg[/url])

([url]http://www.prodirectcricket.com/productimages/V3_1_Main/91632.jpg[/url])

That is not to say small brands don't experiment or try new things (I certainly do), but the majority go with a colour variations of existing designs as the running of a brand is pretty involved so doing development year on year means something has to give elsewhere. The rest is down to costs and timing. The logistics of releasing products (on this occasion delayed due to experimenting with new designs) means that the general public often get to see one product sooner than the other which contributes to the opinion they form about it (as well as their existing association with the other brand).

Innovation in this industry is virtually nonexistent, change is often reactive rather than proactive. Occasionally someone sticks their head above the parapet only for it to be shot at. Those willing to be different also have to accept the high chances of failure - now given the costs involved in R&D, that could potentially break a small brand. The majority of the market wants something familiar, the small proportion who don't are not usually worth the investment. The general public don't have an appreciation for the pitfalls and challenges when dealing with manufacturers abroad (some highlighted by Tom) - often the limitations are not in the minds of the brands, but the ability/ willingness of the manufacturer. In short, there is far more to this than meets the eye.

It may come as no surprise to some of you that (with the exception of some), small brands often talk to each other - they share experiences, tips, tricks, suppliers, etc etc. and are probably less concerned about brands sharing designs than the people on here. (despite his link to Affinity, Tom has been the voice of reason here).

Price will always be difficult to convince customers on but anyone making a comparison between buying an unseen, unbranded product direct from India versus being able to touch and feel a product at a local retail store simply does not understand the logistics involved. Customers are also willing to place a value on a trusted relationship with a retailer - as an example, customers place pre-orders for Phantom products through ItsJustCricket when they can just as easily do it through Phantom directly. Customers want to buy these products from local retailers and therefore the price point has to take into consideration a number of factors - not least that sometimes financial loss is difficult to predict (replacement of damaged items/ loss in transit/ theft). Financial investment and margin structures vary massively between suppliers and retailers too therefore comparisons are difficult.

Anyone who has attempted to do this before will know that starting a brand is the easy part, running a brand is demanding but the true test is in making a brand a successful and viable business. I have the utmost respect for all brands but in particular small successful brands - their challenge is not just the big brands but also the perceptions of customers who often only see a fraction of the effort that has gone into getting a product on a shelf.

Phantom have only just started on this journey and we are most certainly not claiming to know it all or be better than anyone else.


Thanks for reading.


Wow thanks for the calm and measured response
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: alba caerulea on February 08, 2016, 02:38:12 PM
Like the design, I'd choose these over any of the mainstream brands. Good luck with the business
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: edge on February 08, 2016, 04:07:19 PM
Decent response, I think the design similarity business has got blown up a little. Price was the main sticking point for me personally, but it seems Phantom gloves aren't exactly unique on that! What gloves are those Pumas supposed to be similar to? Discontinued range anyway I'm pretty sure.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: ItsJustCricket on February 08, 2016, 04:57:32 PM
Edge, I can't give too much away, but think of a much loved range this year, an English company who supposedly designs their own softs!

CBD
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on February 08, 2016, 05:04:17 PM
Let's not talk in riddles as its a forum and we're all grown ups, it's a design that Affinity used for the split finger gloves.

As discussed in my post earlier post rarely will a smaller boutique brand have a completely original glove design due to the aforementioned reasons.

With the nature of the cricket market softs will always be from a limited number of factories as brands want a certain degree of quality only some can offer at a price point that's viable.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: ItsJustCricket on February 08, 2016, 05:23:51 PM
Tom - I wasn't actually referring to the Affinity gloves whatsoever!

I was making a point that Phantom get a bad rep, yet companies like Affinity, H4L, BB, or many others people have named do the exact same thing - without the tweaks like the carbon detailing, the adjusting to U splits etc.

RE the Salix gloves - the upper is completely different. The only thing similar is the U-splits, and we never claimed Phantom had invented those :)

CBD
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on February 08, 2016, 05:31:30 PM
Apologies in that case, my bad.

At the end of the day all brands are doing what they can to ensure they offer a quality product to a market when coming up again the bigger brands. Be it altering the materials used in the product by selecting those you seem more appropriate or changing colour schemes to suit your particular tastes you can't redesign the wheel in a glove or pad design without going too far away from the norm.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: ItsJustCricket on February 08, 2016, 05:39:41 PM
Tom - agreed with you. I just think it personally grates on myself when people who have no knowledge of the industry are making sweeping comments and critical analysis over something they know very little about.

The forum makes up 0.01% of the market at most, with very few people actually buying the mainstream brands over the Red Ink, B3 competition etc, and compare that to the time we sponsors etc take to post on it, it can become a little bit tiring to only hear criticism and negativity.

With gloves specifically, the Phantom gloves are not a copy of any glove. Many other gloves which have been heralded on this forum are. Many brands , which are loved by the forum, develop their own products far less than Phantom. And yet here I am every week defending them from people who know very little to nothing about margins, prices, manufacturers, retailers etc etc.

I completely agree that you cannot massively redevelop anything - there is a reason many offerings are subtle tweaks on other pre-existing ideas. What does bother me though is people accusing Phantom of just copying others, when I can give evidence of this not being the case, and further evidence of other brands literally just copying and changing the colours, only for them to be held up as an example of innovation. It all just seems a little unfair, and difficult for people to understand why Phantom comes under this criticism whereas other brands don't?

CBD
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: edge on February 08, 2016, 05:41:03 PM
Let's not talk in riddles as its a forum and we're all grown ups, it's a design that Affinity used for the split finger gloves.

As discussed in my post earlier post rarely will a smaller boutique brand have a completely original glove design due to the aforementioned reasons.

With the nature of the cricket market softs will always be from a limited number of factories as brands want a certain degree of quality only some can offer at a price point that's viable.
Ahhh! I see the similarity, one or two fairly major changes on the Affinity ones though. Makes me think I should have bought them instead of the Pumas (which I got recently)! The curse of matching your kit ha.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: brokenbat on February 08, 2016, 05:53:03 PM
Phantom is also using English willow in their bats....so unoriginal !!!
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: smilley792 on February 08, 2016, 06:10:16 PM
If you read this thread without reading who did the posts. You'd think ijc was phantoms owner. And that eaglescc was merely a unbiased stocker off said brand.


The Internet is full off people with an opinion, that they want to give regardless if you want to or not.
Ignorance or a well written reply is much better than a rant about having to deal with such things.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: WalkingWicket37 on February 08, 2016, 06:13:35 PM
These gloves also look familiar don't you think?!

([url]http://www.cricketequipmentusa.com/content/images/thumbs/0001911_ss_cricket_batting_gloves_gladiator_pro_9_by_sunridges.jpeg[/url])

([url]http://www.prodirectcricket.com/productimages/V3_1_Main/91632.jpg[/url])


I think they stole inspiration from an iconic company that sadly went under!

(http://i1206.photobucket.com/albums/bb450/CPye061194/IMG_20160208_180330_zpsuzcbt8ch.jpg) (http://s1206.photobucket.com/user/CPye061194/media/IMG_20160208_180330_zpsuzcbt8ch.jpg.html)

Also triangle splits, illuminati confirmed!
Yeah I'm bored and found that picture in my photobucket  :D
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: RoCo Da Pixie on February 08, 2016, 06:22:04 PM
I never said anything about the design. Personally I think sausage finger gloves are the best. The rest just suck.

I was more mortified at the price of a pair of gloves.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: The Palmist on February 08, 2016, 06:24:56 PM
If the straps can be revolutionised  like remove  velcro  all together  and introduce  a knob (haha) to twist them tight  like some trainers ,  the high price  wont be an issue

Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: smilley792 on February 08, 2016, 06:26:05 PM
What about lacing gloves up for cricket like boxing??

Would stop Warner taking them off between balls.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: WalkingWicket37 on February 08, 2016, 06:27:05 PM
If the straps can be revolutionised  like remove  velcro  all together  and introduce  a knob (haha) to twist them tight  like some trainers ,  the high price  wont be an issue

Come and watch my team on a Saturday, you'll see plenty of knobs twisting their gloves...
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: GDP1964 on February 08, 2016, 06:27:57 PM
Tom - agreed with you. I just think it personally grates on myself when people who have no knowledge of the industry are making sweeping comments and critical analysis over something they know very little about.

The forum makes up 0.01% of the market at most, with very few people actually buying the mainstream brands over the Red Ink, B3 competition etc, and compare that to the time we sponsors etc take to post on it, it can become a little bit tiring to only hear criticism and negativity.

With gloves specifically, the Phantom gloves are not a copy of any glove. Many other gloves which have been heralded on this forum are. Many brands , which are loved by the forum, develop their own products far less than Phantom. And yet here I am every week defending them from people who know very little to nothing about margins, prices, manufacturers, retailers etc etc.

I completely agree that you cannot massively redevelop anything - there is a reason many offerings are subtle tweaks on other pre-existing ideas. What does bother me though is people accusing Phantom of just copying others, when I can give evidence of this not being the case, and further evidence of other brands literally just copying and changing the colours, only for them to be held up as an example of innovation. It all just seems a little unfair, and difficult for people to understand why Phantom comes under this criticism whereas other brands don't?

CBD
All you can do in Life is try your best be Proud of what you do and who you Represent ILC seem to tick all the Boxes don't let the 0.01 percent weigh you down Life is too Short
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Tom on February 08, 2016, 07:20:18 PM
Every brand copies each other, I'd be surprised if Phantom haven't.

Ive worked and designed softs from the ground up, but also definitely remember at one point I clearly remember saying 'Could you please make these Kookaburra pads, but with our branding'. As long as your brand brings something more to the industry than just the same old, I don't see too much wrong with it.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Roaster323 on February 08, 2016, 10:16:33 PM
Come and watch my team on a Saturday, you'll see plenty of knobs twisting their gloves...
Hahaha......nice one!
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: simonmay5 on March 03, 2016, 06:57:14 PM
So much as phantom being their own brand and not copying others I honestly now think the are taking the p**s now all I see now is someone who doesn't have his own ideas and thinks it a good way of coping others  (http://i1360.photobucket.com/albums/r659/Simonalfie5/image_zpsvkmug6wc.jpeg) (http://s1360.photobucket.com/user/Simonalfie5/media/image_zpsvkmug6wc.jpeg.html)
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: ProCricketer1982 on March 03, 2016, 07:00:23 PM
So much as phantom being their own brand and not copying others I honestly now think the are taking the p**s now all I see now is someone who doesn't have his own ideas and thinks it a good way of coping others  ([url]http://i1360.photobucket.com/albums/r659/Simonalfie5/image_zpsvkmug6wc.jpeg[/url]) ([url]http://s1360.photobucket.com/user/Simonalfie5/media/image_zpsvkmug6wc.jpeg.html[/url])


So??

Does it really matter if people copy?? No one forces us to buy the 'copies'.. Although, if you can get exactly the same as brand x but cheaper...then boom!! (Nb.. I have no idea if it is or not)

Good luck to them, if they choose to take the best of the rest then maybe it means a nicer branding for customers, also saves them time, which is money... Win win
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: ProCricketer1982 on March 03, 2016, 07:03:31 PM
Ps I really like those white stickers :)  not going to pay the high price for their kit though.

As Tom mentions, why reinvent the wheel all the time? If yiu find glove x or sticker y that works.. Use it!
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: edge on March 03, 2016, 07:04:15 PM
Who is this meant to be a copy of? I assume H4L, but calling a bespoke service 'custom' is hardly new. I'd be more interested in how are Phantom going to offer a custom service when they don't make bats?
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: SRH on March 03, 2016, 07:11:11 PM
Give it a rest, there can only be so many iterations of stickers, who cares.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: simonmay5 on March 03, 2016, 07:11:22 PM
So??

Does it really matter if people copy?? No one forces us to buy the 'copies'.. Although, if you can get exactly the same as brand x but cheaper...then boom!! (Nb.. I have no idea if it is or not)

Good luck to them, if they choose to take the best of the rest then maybe it means a nicer branding for customers, also saves them time, which is money... Win win


Imagine owning a said brand and everything you do was copied you spent hard work design stickers and softs etc just for phantom to take the easy route and copy which to me is just taking the p**s as it seems whatever h4l do they will copy just feel sorry for all the hard work that Matt and Adam put in just to have their softs and now names of bats copied by phantom
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: ProCricketer1982 on March 03, 2016, 07:14:52 PM

Imagine owning a said brand and everything you do was copied you spent hard work design stickers and softs etc just for phantom to take the easy route and copy which to me is just taking the p**s as it seems whatever h4l do they will copy just feel sorry for all the hard work that Matt and Adam put in just to have their softs and now names of bats copied by phantom

Not sure 'custom' is a copy. I know I had custom on my rpc in 2013 so by that logic h4l have copied?

Anyway, isn't this what business is about ? You as the owner decide how you want to do it.. Plenty of massive companies out there in other markets who rip off far far far far more technical and valuable IP and get away with it.

It's down to consumers to vote win their feet if enough feel strongly about it.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: WalkingWicket37 on March 03, 2016, 07:19:29 PM
I might start my own brand called Fantom Cricket.

I'll sell TK made bats with Affinity esque stickers.
I'll do 4 off the shelf called the Darc Edition, the 'llusion, the Shadows and the T20 Sprite. I might then do a bespoke one called the Customs that's a stock shape that you get different stickers on.

It will be 100% original though, I'll draw up some concepts and backdate them to 2010 to prove I did it first  ;)
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: simonmay5 on March 03, 2016, 07:26:34 PM
I might start my own brand called Fantom Cricket.

I'll sell TK made bats with Affinity esque stickers.
I'll do 4 off the shelf called the Darc Edition, the 'llusion, the Shadows and the T20 Sprite. I might then do a bespoke one called the Customs that's a stock shape that you get different stickers on.

It will be 100% original though, I'll draw up some concepts and backdate them to 2010 to prove I did it first  ;)



I sure it will do great mate really think now phantom don't design f all to easy to copy everyone else
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: FattusCattus on March 03, 2016, 07:29:45 PM
I might start my own brand called Fantom Cricket.

I think for us my friend, a brand called 'Fatmon Cricket' would be more appropriate!
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: smilley792 on March 03, 2016, 07:32:45 PM
Maybe a brand called "blown out of proportion"

You could do a line called "knickers in a twist" and one called "toys out of pram"
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: WalkingWicket37 on March 03, 2016, 07:39:51 PM
Maybe a brand called "blown out of proportion"

You could do a line called "knickers in a twist" and one called "toys out of pram"

They're just silly names now!

I might buy a CNC machine and start a brand called B4U
Will go for minimal stickers and provide every customer a custom made pro experience. I'm.sure nobody would accuse me of stealing that idea...
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: uknsaunders on March 03, 2016, 07:48:00 PM
They're just silly names now!

I might buy a CNC machine and start a brand called B4U
Will go for minimal stickers and provide every customer a custom made pro experience. I'm.sure nobody would accuse me of stealing that idea...
Copy Lathe would be more appropriate.

Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: bostoncricketer on March 03, 2016, 07:49:50 PM
May be each brand needs to create their own language..they can then name their bat whatever they want without sounding like a copy of the other
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: uknsaunders on March 03, 2016, 07:50:28 PM
So much as phantom being their own brand and not copying others I honestly now think the are taking the p**s now all I see now is someone who doesn't have his own ideas and thinks it a good way of coping others  ([url]http://i1360.photobucket.com/albums/r659/Simonalfie5/image_zpsvkmug6wc.jpeg[/url]) ([url]http://s1360.photobucket.com/user/Simonalfie5/media/image_zpsvkmug6wc.jpeg.html[/url])

B3, kooks must be fuming.  Those eBay sellers in India will be out of a job if they can't sell their fake ghost stickers thanks to phantom flooding the market. Disgraceful,  I'm writing to my MP.

Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: uknsaunders on March 03, 2016, 07:52:40 PM
Thankfully Cam phantom haven't seen my short (No Swearing Please) sloping shoulder dwarf bat yet. We can still corner the market in unique designs.

Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: WalkingWicket37 on March 03, 2016, 07:59:04 PM
Thankfully Cam phantom haven't seen my short (No Swearing Please) sloping shoulder dwarf bat yet. We can still corner the market in unique designs.

Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk

That's a great shout. If you put in £50,000 I'll put in nothing
We can split the company 70-30 in my favour and flood the market with nichι shapes.

There could be the mong-goose, super long handle and silly small blade.

Then the scoop-paddle. This would be a totally new, based on a paddle bag with a red painted scoop in the back.

If it all goes well we could then make a dynasty-drive, which is a normal shape with 2 big funky scoops out the back to reduce the weight.

This time next year, we'll be millionaires...
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: uknsaunders on March 03, 2016, 08:09:21 PM
Not sure I like gold on white, I think silver might look better.  Oh wait, thats tomorrow's design.

Joking aside,  Japanese didn't do too bad copying stuff better than us. As long as it's a good copy then will people really care?

Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: JB on March 03, 2016, 08:11:54 PM
Agree about the gold, not for me. Like with the conversation about the softs, are that many of these even going to get sold? I bet I don't see many this season
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: simonmay5 on March 03, 2016, 08:30:22 PM
Agree about the gold, not for me. Like with the conversation about the softs, are that many of these even going to get sold? I bet I don't see many this season


Can't see tk offering a bespoke service any time soon can you mate
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: edge on March 03, 2016, 08:33:16 PM
They're just silly names now!

I might buy a CNC machine and start a brand called B4U
Will go for minimal stickers and provide every customer a custom made pro experience. I'm.sure nobody would accuse me of stealing that idea...
Psh, I'm moving to Sussex, changing my name to Tom Keyley and starting a white label bat manufacturing centre... then just wait for the millions to roll in!
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Northern monkey on March 03, 2016, 08:44:07 PM
Take other brands best bits, flower it up and claim it as your own
They are certainly not gonna make any friends in the industry,I would have thought, but that doesn't seem to bother them
 I admired what Marcus created with affinity and loved the attention to detail and quality he brought to the industry,which I feel ,in turn lifted other companies
Matt at h4l has a similar philosophy in that he wants to create and sell,the highest quality products he can.

It is a huge p##s take to someone else's hard work, copy it, and try and build a brand by doing so.
If that's the way of the world, then that's something I could never do.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: JB on March 03, 2016, 08:56:58 PM

Can't see tk offering a bespoke service any time soon can you mate

It would have to be expensive to be worth his while!
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Buzz on March 03, 2016, 09:04:29 PM

Imagine owning a said brand and everything you do was copied you spent hard work design stickers and softs etc just for phantom to take the easy route and copy which to me is just taking the p**s as it seems whatever h4l do they will copy just feel sorry for all the hard work that Matt and Adam put in just to have their softs and now names of bats copied by phantom

Apple do something similar and no one complains.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: simonmay5 on March 03, 2016, 09:08:43 PM
It would have to be expensive to be worth his while!

One thing for sure it would be very expensive and I am pretty sure that it's something Tim has not got time to do that's for sure
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: WalkingWicket37 on March 03, 2016, 09:11:33 PM
Apple do something similar and no one complains.

samsung do, then lose the court case...  :-[
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Woodyspin on March 03, 2016, 09:13:50 PM
One thing for sure it would be very expensive and I am pretty sure that it's something Tim has not got time to do that's for sure
If he wants to run a business surely you should be looking at doing these things?
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: FattusCattus on March 03, 2016, 09:16:45 PM
He already runs a very successful business, probably one of the best in the industry. I'm sure he;s more than comfortable woth what he produces and for whom.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: WalkingWicket37 on March 03, 2016, 09:17:17 PM
If he wants to run a business surely you should be looking at doing these things?

Really?
Look at the amount of work he's already doing. I think he's got enough on to more than pay off the mortgage and live comfortably already...
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Buzz on March 03, 2016, 09:19:39 PM
Sod it I am going to admit that I really like the stickers and the softs and don't care if they are a copy of anything else.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: FattusCattus on March 03, 2016, 09:21:23 PM
Not white and gold surely?

I didn;t have you down as a Liberace fan!
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: WalkingWicket37 on March 03, 2016, 09:27:29 PM
White and gold?
I saw blue and black...

It's like that interweb dress all over again!!

(http://i1206.photobucket.com/albums/bb450/CPye061194/two-dresses_zpsmgvhefsu.jpg) (http://s1206.photobucket.com/user/CPye061194/media/two-dresses_zpsmgvhefsu.jpg.html)
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: liscon12 on March 03, 2016, 09:28:10 PM
I love white stickers but the gold is just too ostentatious for me.

Copying and taking ideas from other people isn't anything new no matter what business and industry you're in, all you have to do is make sure what you're producing and selling is better than all the rest and that way you'll be at the top, Forward thinking companies don't stand still and wait for everyone to catch up but rather they're always looking at new and exciting ideas to ensure they are ahead of the game. Copying shows or tells people that you are struggling to become innovative and new and therefore you'll always be behind.

FYI this is not a stab at Phantom just a thought about companies in general :)
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: uknsaunders on March 03, 2016, 09:49:43 PM
Not sure apple strictly copy.  They are very good and building a well packaged product that is consumer friendly and stylish.  The product they produce is distinctively apple and not just a copy of Samsung or anybody else. Yes they may take the best bits of others products but it's well blended.  Not an apple fan nowadays but it's not a blatant copy of somebody else.

Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: petehosk on March 03, 2016, 10:28:24 PM
There is another way of looking at it.......

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery!

Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: ProCricketer1982 on March 03, 2016, 10:30:43 PM
There is another way of looking at it.......

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery!

Exactly. Either way, shouldn't matter what other brands are doing if you're concentrating on yourself.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: brokenbat on March 03, 2016, 10:42:27 PM
So much as phantom being their own brand and not copying others I honestly now think the are taking the p**s now all I see now is someone who doesn't have his own ideas and thinks it a good way of coping others  ([url]http://i1360.photobucket.com/albums/r659/Simonalfie5/image_zpsvkmug6wc.jpeg[/url]) ([url]http://s1360.photobucket.com/user/Simonalfie5/media/image_zpsvkmug6wc.jpeg.html[/url])


what is the "copy"???
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: procricket on March 03, 2016, 10:42:46 PM
All hail the boo brigade hell somebody has serious rattled some of your cages.

Forumitus is very much the case at times look beyond the forum at times and not get tunnel vision.

Good luck to Aftab who is a member from the forum spends his own money setting up and actually having a go at it......

Too many have to much chat without backing stuff up shame but at times like this the forum sucks.



Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Northern monkey on March 04, 2016, 07:37:55 AM
It's a forum Dave
A place to discuss and inform
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: procricket on March 04, 2016, 07:47:36 AM
It's a forum Dave
A place to discuss and inform

Exactly and i expressed mine pal.



Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: smilley792 on March 04, 2016, 08:44:45 AM
This forum goes wild on occasion.

H4l is the flavour of the month! And they can do no wrong. And everyone's anti anything that may get near them.

Was b3 when they joined

Aldred before them.




This forum also has a clique problem. Cliques aren't always the same they change and migrate. But when they get going. All the clique love to reply to all the threads involving them and if someone outside the clique dare to have a different opinion! Well. Wow.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Kulli on March 04, 2016, 08:50:23 AM
I have to admit I thought the stickers were very similar to Affinity when I first saw them, but other than that nothing has struck me as markedly 'copy cat', and as people have said even if it was, so what, the world is full of people taking others ideas and doing it better/cheaper etc and making money from it.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: WalkingWicket37 on March 04, 2016, 08:56:47 AM
@smilley792 you're just jealous because you live up Norfff and are still using B3 gears.
You've accepted that there's no way you'll get into the Southern dwelling, H4L wielding clique now, so are starting a hate campaign  ;)
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: liscon12 on March 04, 2016, 09:08:19 AM
The North South divide even extends to the forum, I'm a proud Northerner who loves a good ale, eats black pudding and talks reet funny like marra. :D
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: northernboy1987 on March 04, 2016, 09:15:43 AM
The North South divide even extends to the forum, I'm a proud Northerner who loves a good ale, eats black pudding and talks reet funny like marra. :D

I'm secretly from the south and am merely masquerading as a big hairy northerner, where did I put my shandy? :D
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: liscon12 on March 04, 2016, 09:18:03 AM
I'm secretly from the south and am merely masquerading as a big hairy northerner, where did I put my shandy? :D
Shandy? you mean wine!
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: skip1973 on March 04, 2016, 09:18:38 AM
As an outsider I think they look classy, obviously they are aimed a certain market and that's ok.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: liscon12 on March 04, 2016, 09:20:19 AM
I feel this thread might have become slightly derailed as we're now talking about Apple Inc, Northerners, Cricket bats, Stickers and stealing ideas, none of which relate to the actually title "2016 Phantom Softs"
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: northernboy1987 on March 04, 2016, 09:24:40 AM
Shandy? you mean wine!

No because I actually really like wine and therefore unwilling to make a joke about it haha  :D
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: liscon12 on March 04, 2016, 09:43:43 AM
No because I actually really like wine and therefore unwilling to make a joke about it haha  :D
Hahaha Wine is the blood of Satan, the moment it touches my tongue my face contorts into weird and frankly scary positions all of which I can only assume to be the work of Beelzebub himself. The creators of wine must (to my knowledge) be masochists, Beer trumps all other beverages in its taste, complexity, variety, colour, bouquet and its ability to go down so easily like you're drinking the nectar of the Gods!
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: petehosk on March 04, 2016, 09:44:34 AM
Cucumber sandwich @northernboy1987 ?? My round plus I will de-crust them before serving?
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: northernboy1987 on March 04, 2016, 09:50:28 AM
Cucumber sandwich @northernboy1987 ?? My round plus I will de-crust them before serving?

I'm extremely Northern pal, would eat a scabby horse between two soiled mattresses if I was hungry enough, like @liscon12 says we eat an unnaturally large amount of spiced pigs blood up here and bloody delicious it is too haha :D
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: northernboy1987 on March 04, 2016, 09:51:38 AM
Hahaha Wine is the blood of Satan, the moment it touches my tongue my face contorts into weird and frankly scary positions all of which I can only assume to be the work of Beelzebub himself. The creators of wine must (to my knowledge) be masochists, Beer trumps all other beverages in its taste, complexity, variety, colour, bouquet and its ability to go down so easily like you're drinking the nectar of the Gods!

Behave. I mean I enjoy beer as much as the next man but wine is the daddy for me like.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: liscon12 on March 04, 2016, 09:53:39 AM
It has to be the type that has massive chunks of fat in it as well but that's a personal preference. We love meat and processed food so much we even have a sausage named after our county which isn't sold in little finger sized portions but rather in huge long coils.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: liscon12 on March 04, 2016, 10:07:56 AM
Any ways back to soft talk. 


So when are you planning on having this range in store @ItsJustCricket ?
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Wickets-then-runs on March 04, 2016, 11:33:35 AM
Is it a bit too late to say that i like the bat stickers?  :)
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: EaglesCC on March 04, 2016, 02:56:36 PM
Perhaps it's worth starting off by explaining why the "Custom" label has come about. It's no secret I don't make my own bats because I am very open about this. It doesn't take a genius to work out who does (but by all means give yourselves a pat on the back).

As a small set up, 99% of the bats offered are in regular short handle (it's the most common ask) – however EVERY single bat ever sold under the Phantom brand has been made to order to my exact shapes, weights, etc – not a single bat has been picked from pre-mades. This means I can (and do) make tweaks or complete changes to the shapes.

I often get requests for bats that are longer blades or handles, with higher/ lower middles – changes to existing shapes or a copy of a much loved old faithful. All of these are accommodated but it's never really been marketed, until now.

So under the Custom option, the customer gets to choose from something straightforward as the size of handle right across to sending in a bat for an exact copy and therefore their bat will be 'made to order' (too long to fit on a label as a name), 'modified from an existing shape' (doesn't sounds right that) or custom-made – ah! that’s the one! It sums up exactly what the bat is about. The other name considered was bespoke but that’s more suited to garments and tailoring - also is somewhat misleading.

What's unique (or not commonly done) about the Phantom service is that two bats can be bought together to the same specs – first in a higher grade for matches and the second a lower grade which is much cheaper for practice.


A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. It seems everyone thinks they know the inside leg measurement of the said bat maker – but as someone who spends a fair amount of time with him on a regular basis, I can confirm much of the loose talk about him on this forum has no basis.

So is this a custom service – damn right it is! Why don't others who use the same bat maker offer it? I couldn't tell you – perhaps in their wisdom they just don't want the hassle.

Re: Softs, it seems my previous post has fallen on deaf ears. These are not H4L designs – end of!


I have never forced anyone to buy a Phantom bat however anyone who has felt particularly obliged to buy one for threat to their sheer existence, I am happy for you to return the bat for a full refund.

That includes you Simon – for when you met me and bought three bats, with the same current branding and labels you were fine with it. To this end you recently said to me on email that the Shadow Players you have is a gun. If it's just the labels you are unhappy about you're welcome to remove them from the bat – and return the set you bought only as recently as a couple of weeks ago.



Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: cricketbadger on March 04, 2016, 03:01:15 PM
Perhaps it's worth starting off by explaining why the "Custom" label has come about. It's no secret I don't make my own bats because I am very open about this. It doesn't take a genius to work out who does (but by all means give yourselves a pat on the back).

As a small set up, 99% of the bats offered are in regular short handle (it's the most common ask) – however EVERY single bat ever sold under the Phantom brand has been made to order to my exact shapes, weights, etc – not a single bat has been picked from pre-mades. This means I can (and do) make tweaks or complete changes to the shapes.

I often get requests for bats that are longer blades or handles, with higher/ lower middles – changes to existing shapes or a copy of a much loved old faithful. All of these are accommodated but it's never really been marketed, until now.

So under the Custom option, the customer gets to choose from something straightforward as the size of handle right across to sending in a bat for an exact copy and therefore their bat will be 'made to order' (too long to fit on a label as a name), 'modified from an existing shape' (doesn't sounds right that) or custom-made – ah! that’s the one! It sums up exactly what the bat is about. The other name considered was bespoke but that’s more suited to garments and tailoring - also is somewhat misleading.

What's unique (or not commonly done) about the Phantom service is that two bats can be bought together to the same specs – first in a higher grade for matches and the second a lower grade which is much cheaper for practice.


A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. It seems everyone thinks they know the inside leg measurement of the said bat maker – but as someone who spends a fair amount of time with him on a regular basis, I can confirm much of the loose talk about him on this forum has no basis.

So is this a custom service – damn right it is! Why don't others who use the same bat maker offer it? I couldn't tell you – perhaps in their wisdom they just don't want the hassle.

Re: Softs, it seems my previous post has fallen on deaf ears. These are not H4L designs – end of!


I have never forced anyone to buy a Phantom bat however anyone who has felt particularly obliged to buy one for threat to their sheer existence, I am happy for you to return the bat for a full refund.

That includes you Simon – for when you met me and bought three bats, with the same current branding and labels you were fine with it. To this end you recently said to me on email that the Shadow Players you have is a gun. If it's just the labels you are unhappy about you're welcome to remove them from the bat – and return the set you bought only as recently as a couple of weeks ago.

Well said, If I could pat you on the back I would
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Kulli on March 04, 2016, 03:33:00 PM
ZING!
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: ProCricketer1982 on March 04, 2016, 03:43:30 PM
That includes you Simon – for when you met me and bought three bats, with the same current branding and labels you were fine with it. To this end you recently said to me on email that the Shadow Players you have is a gun. If it's just the labels you are unhappy about you're welcome to remove them from the bat – and return the set you bought only as recently as a couple of weeks ago.

Pown'd
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: cricketbadger on March 04, 2016, 03:57:36 PM
Admins you can Lock this one down :)
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: brokenbat on March 04, 2016, 03:57:42 PM
Now that is an epic BURRRN if I ever saw one. Hopefully we can now move back to discussing "storm damage bargains" now
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Uzi Sports on March 04, 2016, 04:13:19 PM
Perhaps it's worth starting off by explaining why the "Custom" label has come about. It's no secret I don't make my own bats because I am very open about this. It doesn't take a genius to work out who does (but by all means give yourselves a pat on the back).

As a small set up, 99% of the bats offered are in regular short handle (it's the most common ask) – however EVERY single bat ever sold under the Phantom brand has been made to order to my exact shapes, weights, etc – not a single bat has been picked from pre-mades. This means I can (and do) make tweaks or complete changes to the shapes.

I often get requests for bats that are longer blades or handles, with higher/ lower middles – changes to existing shapes or a copy of a much loved old faithful. All of these are accommodated but it's never really been marketed, until now.

So under the Custom option, the customer gets to choose from something straightforward as the size of handle right across to sending in a bat for an exact copy and therefore their bat will be 'made to order' (too long to fit on a label as a name), 'modified from an existing shape' (doesn't sounds right that) or custom-made – ah! that’s the one! It sums up exactly what the bat is about. The other name considered was bespoke but that’s more suited to garments and tailoring - also is somewhat misleading.

What's unique (or not commonly done) about the Phantom service is that two bats can be bought together to the same specs – first in a higher grade for matches and the second a lower grade which is much cheaper for practice.


A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. It seems everyone thinks they know the inside leg measurement of the said bat maker – but as someone who spends a fair amount of time with him on a regular basis, I can confirm much of the loose talk about him on this forum has no basis.

So is this a custom service – damn right it is! Why don't others who use the same bat maker offer it? I couldn't tell you – perhaps in their wisdom they just don't want the hassle.

Re: Softs, it seems my previous post has fallen on deaf ears. These are not H4L designs – end of!


I have never forced anyone to buy a Phantom bat however anyone who has felt particularly obliged to buy one for threat to their sheer existence, I am happy for you to return the bat for a full refund.

That includes you Simon – for when you met me and bought three bats, with the same current branding and labels you were fine with it. To this end you recently said to me on email that the Shadow Players you have is a gun. If it's just the labels you are unhappy about you're welcome to remove them from the bat – and return the set you bought only as recently as a couple of weeks ago.

Correction on your statement regarding others are not offering bespoke service who use the same bat maker. I believe Blank bats offer as well as we have done  quite a few for our customers
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: EaglesCC on March 04, 2016, 04:32:25 PM
Correction on your statement regarding others are not offering bespoke service who use the same bat maker. I believe Blank bats offer as well as we have done  quite a few for our customers

I don't doubt that you do.

How anyone else markets it (or doesnt) is entirely down to them however for me the logic of making it plainly obvious that the latest offering is not an off the shelf product should require no explanation - but I have given one anyway because seemingly it's inconceivable to some that Phantom can offer this service. Which in fact is the other reason for launching the label.


Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Gurujames on March 04, 2016, 04:40:16 PM
You may accuse me of being a bit slow but, who does make Phantom bats?
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: smilley792 on March 04, 2016, 04:42:57 PM
You may accuse me of being a bit slow but, who does make Phantom bats?

Are you TKing the mick?
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: simonmay5 on March 05, 2016, 04:00:07 PM

That includes you Simon � for when you met me and bought three bats, with the same current branding and labels you were fine with it. To this end you recently said to me on email that the Shadow Players you have is a gun. If it's just the labels you are unhappy about you're welcome to remove them from the bat � and return the set you bought only as recently as a couple of weeks ago

I never said the bats was not good I think you're find I was one of the first people on this forum to buy them I just said I thought your softs was very similar and names like custom just says the same as other brand I just thought you would come up with something different as to me custom is a bespoke service and I sure that a thing that can't be done
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: smilley792 on March 05, 2016, 04:04:03 PM
@simonmay5 read his replies. He's said this is a custom option.

Something tk offers via them, Uzi and BB.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Ams4287 on March 05, 2016, 04:16:44 PM
Whilst I'm sure various people are passionate about the designs / colour schemes of the protection they use from a cricket ball (majority of us playing in local leagues) or a bat made by specific batmakers or sold by certain 3rd parties. There is only so much you can do and only so many factories out there in the case of softs and shapes in the case of bats - which is why there's presumably no IP out there as was mentioned earlier.

Quite frankly pop the teddys back in the pram, if you like a certain brand / design buy them if you don't then don't. Appreciate it's peoples businesses but really is it the end of the world.......

It's great to have access to brands and insights into decisions taken, it would be a shame if this kind of thread put people off.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: hanif on March 05, 2016, 04:18:13 PM
I think it is great that two of the smaller brands are producing such great kit and offering so many excellent options. I have said previously the H4L softs are the best quality softs I have seen in person and I feel the phantom softs offer some of the best looking softs and I am sure the quality is excellent as well. Compare these products to other leading brands and they are miles ahead. So well done to both companies and keep up the great work.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: liscon12 on March 05, 2016, 04:33:48 PM
Do you have plans to stock Phantom @hanif ?
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: iand123 on March 05, 2016, 04:52:05 PM
Interesting thread this one, not had one of these for a while.

Price is an interesting one and the market seems to be pushing upwards. For me it's too much particularly for a new(ish) brand but hey everyone has to start somewhere in this industry and as has been said by many it's good to see the guys behind phantom putting their money where their mouth is and giving it all they've got.

Personally not a fan of the stickers but the phantom brand is evolving and it's clear to see (for me anyway) that as they evolve they are clearly learning what works and what doesn't and aren't afraid to try new things. Great to hear the insight into decisions too, would be a shame if that was to stop.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: JB on March 05, 2016, 05:32:11 PM
Put these sorts against the NC654 gloves @ £95/pair! these are far better

Last years gloves and pads are on sale on the Phantom website, £85 for the set is good value!
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: hanif on March 05, 2016, 05:49:55 PM
@liscon12 we wont be stocking phantom cricket equipment and before anyone asks Aftab is not related to me and I do not know him on a personal level. I am sure if Aftab was a forum sponsor you would be singing his praises. Matt is one of the nicest guys you are ever likely to meet he is producing some of the best bats and his softs are amazing, the best I have seen. I will always recommend people to deal with Matt. But I do feel that Phantom are getting treated unfairly they have taken inspiration from a few different brands and created there own identity. This is what majority of companies do. It is innovation. Designs will always be similar. The only similarities with the H4L and phantom softs is the colour schemes and the quality other than that I can see no other similarities the glove designs are different, the pad designs are different. As for the use of custom Aftab has explained this and makes perfect sense. I think both these companies deserve to be praised as they are setting the bench mark very high and have surpassed a lot of the big companies. Matt is making bats people dream about and is quickly becoming one of the big names in bat making. Aftab in a short space of time has created a brand that people love. The only thing I can see here is a lot of positives. So I think it is time we stopped being so negative.
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: brokenbat on March 05, 2016, 07:56:16 PM
The "copy cat" arguments here are kinda silly.. If a new brand decides to start selling cricket balls, will we all jump on them as well for "copying" Dukes or Readers??
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: skip1973 on March 05, 2016, 11:02:08 PM
Best thing I have seen written here ever " A little knowledge is a dangerous thing"
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: WalkingWicket37 on March 06, 2016, 12:04:59 AM
I'd this thread still going on?

Surely there can't be much left to say on any of the "issues" now...
Title: Re: 2016 Phantom Softs
Post by: Sivlar13 on March 06, 2016, 07:22:22 AM
(http://i1045.photobucket.com/albums/b451/Joshua_Sivier/Mobile%20Uploads/55AF8937-6F57-4F93-B5B9-5B1D77BC060F_zpsuauw1qlo.jpg) (http://s1045.photobucket.com/user/Joshua_Sivier/media/Mobile%20Uploads/55AF8937-6F57-4F93-B5B9-5B1D77BC060F_zpsuauw1qlo.jpg.html)