Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 13

Author Topic: Cricket Bat Manufacturers vs. Cricket Bat Brands  (Read 53786 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Number4

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4486
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Cricket Bat Manufacturers vs. Cricket Bat Brands
« Reply #105 on: October 21, 2015, 11:58:17 AM »

A legitimate question I thought. If all bats are handpicked then surely they would/could come with a pingability guarantee.
Logged
This information is for educational purposes only.
Under no circumstances can this be copied or reproduced in any way without the permission of the author

ItsJustCricket

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3698
  • Trade Count: (+9)
    • Its Just Cricket
Re: Cricket Bat Manufacturers vs. Cricket Bat Brands
« Reply #106 on: October 21, 2015, 12:30:56 PM »

A legitimate question I thought. If all bats are handpicked then surely they would/could come with a pingability guarantee.

I agree and effectively they do.

Bats_Entertainment

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5049
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Cricket Bat Manufacturers vs. Cricket Bat Brands
« Reply #107 on: October 21, 2015, 12:45:46 PM »

I try not to drawn into this kind of debate, but: doesn't this assume that a bat that pings best from new, pings best over time?
Logged

ItsJustCricket

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3698
  • Trade Count: (+9)
    • Its Just Cricket
Re: Cricket Bat Manufacturers vs. Cricket Bat Brands
« Reply #108 on: October 21, 2015, 01:09:33 PM »

I try not to drawn into this kind of debate, but: doesn't this assume that a bat that pings best from new, pings best over time?

Admittedly, and obviously, you can never get a feel for how a bat might be once it has opened up, or how it will play in 2 years time, but we feel also judge bats based on how soft or hard they are as well. I.e - if the bats ping the same, but one is slightly harder, we would probably pick that one because it is more likely to reach a higher level of ping at some stage in its life than the soft one, whereby the current level of ping might be the absolute maximum it will ever achieve. Hopefully that makes sense!

Neon Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2802
  • Trade Count: (+2)
    • Neon Cricket
Re: Cricket Bat Manufacturers vs. Cricket Bat Brands
« Reply #109 on: October 21, 2015, 01:11:32 PM »

I agree and effectively they do.

So if the bat doesn't 'ping' well enough that would be legitimate reason for a refund? What if it had been already used?
Logged
Email: adam@neoncricket.co.uk
Website: www.neoncricket.co.uk
Social Media: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram

trypewriter

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2227
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: Cricket Bat Manufacturers vs. Cricket Bat Brands
« Reply #110 on: October 21, 2015, 01:21:34 PM »

I try not to drawn into this kind of debate, but: doesn't this assume that a bat that pings best from new, pings best over time?

Not to mention, pings best for someone you lend it to!  :(
Logged
'His was a cameo of savage cuts and pulls - the tragedy being that none made contact with the ball.'

Bats_Entertainment

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5049
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Cricket Bat Manufacturers vs. Cricket Bat Brands
« Reply #111 on: October 21, 2015, 01:25:06 PM »

Admittedly, and obviously, you can never get a feel for how a bat might be once it has opened up, or how it will play in 2 years time, but we feel also judge bats based on how soft or hard they are as well. I.e - if the bats ping the same, but one is slightly harder, we would probably pick that one because it is more likely to reach a higher level of ping at some stage in its life than the soft one, whereby the current level of ping might be the absolute maximum it will ever achieve. Hopefully that makes sense!


Not really. Did you read the 'pro-pressing" thread started by The Doctor?
Logged

ItsJustCricket

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3698
  • Trade Count: (+9)
    • Its Just Cricket
Re: Cricket Bat Manufacturers vs. Cricket Bat Brands
« Reply #112 on: October 21, 2015, 03:56:09 PM »

That was a generic example - not one we always stick to religiously!

With regards to a ping guarantee - Our handpicking service is designed to stop these sort of returns being necessary. We would hate to be in a position where a customer has used the bat, and so cannot return it, but still isn't happy with the ping - that's why we hand pick it! If you get it from another shop, you use it, it has poor ping, you're stuffed because it cannot be returned. This is just another advantage of buying from us - the ping is there because they've been handpicked on performance, and so this isn't something you need to worry about when shopping with IJC!

The Doctor

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 537
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Cricket Bat Manufacturers vs. Cricket Bat Brands
« Reply #113 on: October 21, 2015, 04:06:53 PM »

That was a generic example - not one we always stick to religiously!

With regards to a ping guarantee - Our handpicking service is designed to stop these sort of returns being necessary. We would hate to be in a position where a customer has used the bat, and so cannot return it, but still isn't happy with the ping - that's why we hand pick it! If you get it from another shop, you use it, it has poor ping, you're stuffed because it cannot be returned. This is just another advantage of buying from us - the ping is there because they've been handpicked on performance, and so this isn't something you need to worry about when shopping with IJC!

Interested to know how you hand pick on performacne.
Logged
dbacon1980@gmail.com

Never stand still

The Doctor

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 537
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Cricket Bat Manufacturers vs. Cricket Bat Brands
« Reply #114 on: October 21, 2015, 04:07:25 PM »



Not really. Did you read the 'pro-pressing" thread started by The Doctor?

I'll take that as a no!
Logged
dbacon1980@gmail.com

Never stand still

ItsJustCricket

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3698
  • Trade Count: (+9)
    • Its Just Cricket
Re: Cricket Bat Manufacturers vs. Cricket Bat Brands
« Reply #115 on: October 21, 2015, 04:09:22 PM »

I read it completely - and we respect your expertise, hence why we didn't comment on the post!

We hand pick on performance based on chats with the bat makers whilst we are there, based on pinging a ball off them in the warehouses etc, based on rebound potential with a mallet - up and down the middle, and all over the blade!

Gurujames

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1663
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Cricket Bat Manufacturers vs. Cricket Bat Brands
« Reply #116 on: October 21, 2015, 04:33:15 PM »

I think what you do shows excellent customer service. If you went to a bog standard retailer you would have a small selection of bats to chose from. You would not be able to knock them up either. Let's face it, if you were allowed to give them a bash you would chose the one you felt had the largest and best responding sweet spot. Buying from a shop like yours means you have gone through that for us.
Yes, maybe some bats may perform better in 2 seasons time but you cannot see into the future.
At the end of the day I know where I will get my Warbird from.
Logged

ItsJustCricket

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3698
  • Trade Count: (+9)
    • Its Just Cricket
Re: Cricket Bat Manufacturers vs. Cricket Bat Brands
« Reply #117 on: October 21, 2015, 04:48:44 PM »

Thank you - that sort of feedback is why we do what we do! Made me smile!

skip1973

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1576
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Cricket Bat Manufacturers vs. Cricket Bat Brands
« Reply #118 on: October 21, 2015, 09:58:45 PM »

I'm a bit surprised you don't get more resistance from manufacturers, you're essentially saying you take the pick of their stock and other retailers get left overs that could be inferior. I would have thought more would take GM's stance of having faith in all their products.
Logged

Vitas Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6625
  • Trade Count: (+20)
  • Cricket Retailer & Coaching Centre in Peterborough
    • Vitas Cricket
Re: Cricket Bat Manufacturers vs. Cricket Bat Brands
« Reply #119 on: October 21, 2015, 10:30:44 PM »

That was a generic example - not one we always stick to religiously!

With regards to a ping guarantee - Our handpicking service is designed to stop these sort of returns being necessary. We would hate to be in a position where a customer has used the bat, and so cannot return it, but still isn't happy with the ping - that's why we hand pick it! If you get it from another shop, you use it, it has poor ping, you're stuffed because it cannot be returned. This is just another advantage of buying from us - the ping is there because they've been handpicked on performance, and so this isn't something you need to worry about when shopping with IJC!

Quite a sweeping statement.....

Other shops handpick bats too remember, maybe not 100% of their stock but that doesn't mean IJC is the only shop who handpicks as this statement implies
« Last Edit: October 22, 2015, 09:23:13 AM by Vitas Cricket »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 13
 

Advertise on CBF