Gray Nicolls 50+
Advertise on CBF
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 7

Author Topic: Gray Nicolls 50+  (Read 29315 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

InternalTraining

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4792
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Gray Nicolls 50+
« Reply #30 on: March 30, 2016, 03:39:52 AM »
Quote from: Over Gully on March 30, 2016, 02:44:59 AM
Not trying to be alarmist or anything, but very soon there is going to be a serious injury (or a fatality) on the field thanks to these bats. Either the umpire at the bowler's end or the bowler is going to cop one hit straight at them and they won't have time to react. There has to be some kind of size restriction on the edges/spine of a bat. These things are enormous. Would I like to try one in the nets? Absolutely yes, just to see what it's like batting with something that Warner would take to the crease, but surely bats can't get much bigger, can they?

Umpires can request a helmet if they want.
Logged

InternalTraining

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4792
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Gray Nicolls 50+
« Reply #31 on: March 30, 2016, 03:41:00 AM »
Quote from: dt-second-hand-cricket on March 30, 2016, 03:29:12 AM
another nail in the coffin for all bowlers - how glad am i that i keep wicket too - do not have to bowl at someone using one of these or field in their striking zone!!!!!

Minimum weight of these bats is 2-12. Not many clubies like to use 2-12 bats.
Logged

brokenbat

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 2320
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Gray Nicolls 50+
« Reply #32 on: March 30, 2016, 04:17:21 AM »
Quote from: Over Gully on March 30, 2016, 02:44:59 AM
Not trying to be alarmist or anything, but very soon there is going to be a serious injury (or a fatality) on the field thanks to these bats. Either the umpire at the bowler's end or the bowler is going to cop one hit straight at them and they won't have time to react. There has to be some kind of size restriction on the edges/spine of a bat. These things are enormous. Would I like to try one in the nets? Absolutely yes, just to see what it's like batting with something that Warner would take to the crease, but surely bats can't get much bigger, can they?

I think this is purely cosmetic (but yeah i still want it)...may be hard to believe, but I am going with my old physics text book here: Force = mass (i.e weight) × acceleration

The extra power we see today is because of much stronger guys who practice power hitting like never before. You hand warner a much smaller 2lb 15 bat than this...the umpire will still be in the same danger.
Logged

Cover_Drive

  • Moderator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5698
  • Trade Count: (+14)
Re: Gray Nicolls 50+
« Reply #33 on: March 30, 2016, 05:03:13 AM »
I called Gray Nicolls Australia and they said it will hit shelves in July/August.

That is going to be a long wait.

I think there will b minimalistic difference between this and Usman Khawaja's profile as it doesn't have exaggerated bow like David Warner's.
Logged
Twitter: @_UzairM

smilley792

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8755
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Willoooowwwww
Re: Gray Nicolls 50+
« Reply #34 on: March 30, 2016, 05:06:32 AM »
In the 16-22yards between the where a bowler or umpire will be when a batsmen smokes it back, I honestly don't think the reaction time between this bat and a standard powerbow for instance, will make a difference.

It's gonna be milliseconds, it's not even gonna be a second difference.


The difference comes from the intent in today's game. Players train to hit hard, to be stronger, to be fitter, practice range hitting.

Chris gayle smoking one straight with a standard cleft, or with a low density cleft is still going to cause issues if it hits either of the two people we are worried about.



Look at the pic on Twitter, was antherton, and Fairbrother sat outside Taj Mahal, both looked like skinny teens, then under was root, and buttler recreating pic, They look liked sportsman who train in comparison





Today's cricketers are just built better.
« Last Edit: March 30, 2016, 05:10:58 AM by smilley792 »
Logged
@chrisjones792
Fastest ton- 54balls

Northern monkey

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3657
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Gray Nicolls 50+
« Reply #35 on: March 30, 2016, 07:59:02 AM »
Watched the film
Blokes clever in his description of the tricks used to get a little of the weight down.
At the end of the day, it's a big old lump of dead weight that's gotta be picked up before a shot can be played.
You've still gotta generate bat speed to get distance and power into shots.
We dont all face 80mph plus bowling.

Warners bats an over dried cleft,(that's been said before) as has the fact batters are stronger.

I remember years ago, blokes batting with SS jumbos etc and only ever connecting with the odd one.

None of the above is gonna stop me having a go at making a khawaja rep
Logged

InternalTraining

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4792
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Gray Nicolls 50+
« Reply #36 on: March 30, 2016, 03:28:52 PM »
Logged

skip1973

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1576
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Gray Nicolls 50+
« Reply #37 on: May 06, 2016, 03:50:48 AM »

Took a pic of the sample 50+ dwarfing the Warner I have, those with a Warner will appreciate how big this 50+ is.
Logged

JB

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2123
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Gray Nicolls 50+
« Reply #38 on: May 06, 2016, 05:45:06 AM »
What is the weight of that 50+ skip?
Logged

skip1973

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1576
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Gray Nicolls 50+
« Reply #39 on: May 06, 2016, 05:47:05 AM »
2.15
Logged

Bats_Galore

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 232
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Gray Nicolls 50+
« Reply #40 on: May 06, 2016, 07:09:37 AM »
Whist it is clearly a bigger bat, I don't feel the picture is giving a fair comparison, the Warner bat is showing quite a bit of the face, whilst the 50+ none. Thus it seems to me the difference is being exaggerated by the picture.
Logged

Bats_Galore

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 232
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Gray Nicolls 50+
« Reply #41 on: May 06, 2016, 07:13:04 AM »
The 50+ looks a beautiful shape regardless of weight, how does it differ from the Warner?
Logged

FattusCattus

Re: Gray Nicolls 50+
« Reply #42 on: May 06, 2016, 09:26:58 AM »
Doesn't matter how big your weapon is if you can't use it properly!
Logged
If you tolerate this, then your baked goods will be next.

Mpt7

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 474
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Gray Nicolls 50+
« Reply #43 on: May 06, 2016, 10:11:13 AM »
That is big bat! It looks like a shorter blade and longer handle. give it time we'll all be using a mallet!!
Logged

skip1973

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1576
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Gray Nicolls 50+
« Reply #44 on: May 06, 2016, 11:07:56 AM »
Quote from: Bats_Galore on May 06, 2016, 07:09:37 AM
Whist it is clearly a bigger bat, I don't feel the picture is giving a fair comparison, the Warner bat is showing quite a bit of the face, whilst the 50+ none. Thus it seems to me the difference is being exaggerated by the picture.
Not exaggerated at all, I took a few extra pics I will put up later. Bat isn't for sale either by the way, just had the rep by today with his sample.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 7
« previous next »
 

Advertise on CBF