Topic: Sa vs aus (Read 101904 times)

iand123 · « **Reply #90 on:** March 06, 2018, 05:02:13 PM »

Quote from: RPC/Blueroom Cricket - Adie on March 05, 2018, 06:04:10 PM

If that�s true a long ban should happen. Sadly given the verbals around in the game now it probably is true. People literally can�t comtrol themselves

All this yet again should call into focus the need to ban sledging. Simply no need for it.. be professional ffs

It�s obvious now that no one can control themselves so just ban it totally and turn up the stump mics to catch anything said

Aussie logic:

Comments about an Australian players wife = out of order

Comments about a non Australian players dad committing suicide = ok

ProCricketer1982 · « **Reply #91 on:** March 06, 2018, 05:33:14 PM »

Quote from: iand123 on March 06, 2018, 05:02:13 PM

Aussie logic:

Comments about an Australian players wife = out of order

Comments about a non Australian players dad committing suicide = ok

Yes but as always.. just because one team or nation does it doesn�t mean everyone should

six and out · « **Reply #92 on:** March 06, 2018, 05:56:12 PM »

Both Warner and QDK charged.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/story/1139103.html?CMP=OTC-RSS

cricketbadger · « **Reply #93 on:** March 06, 2018, 06:44:40 PM »

On what grounds has De Kock been charged? Must be some more evidence as all the video showed was him walking to changing room, Warner on the other hand

KD4 · « **Reply #94 on:** March 06, 2018, 07:04:45 PM »

Quote from: six and out on March 06, 2018, 05:56:12 PM

Both Warner and QDK charged.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/story/1139103.html?CMP=OTC-RSS

If Warner is banned for 1 game, who opens the batting for Aus

six and out · « **Reply #95 on:** March 06, 2018, 07:12:16 PM »

Quote from: cricketbadger on March 06, 2018, 06:44:40 PM

On what grounds has De Kock been charged? Must be some more evidence as all the video showed was him walking to changing room, Warner on the other hand

The umpires/ICC have bottled it basically. The are saying they heard nothing on the pitch which is ridiculous.

QDK gets a level 1 charge which will probably mean a fine and maybe a de-merit point.

Warner gets a level 2 charge which can be up to 4 de-merit points which means a 1 match ban. So it will be interesting what he gets.

Also as a cricketing point Handscomb is AUS spare batter so if Warner does get a 1 match ban then a presume S.Marsh has to open and Handscomb bats 5.

Manormanic · « **Reply #96 on:** March 06, 2018, 07:16:46 PM »

Quote from: six and out on March 06, 2018, 07:12:16 PM

The umpires/ICC have bottled it basically. The are saying they heard nothing on the pitch which is ridiculous.

QDK gets a level 1 charge which will probably mean a fine and maybe a de-merit point.

Warner gets a level 2 charge which can be up to 4 de-merit points which means a 1 match ban. So it will be interesting what he gets.

Also as a cricketing point Handscomb is AUS spare batter so if Warner does get a 1 match ban then a presume S.Marsh has to open and Handscomb bats 5.

Or Paine opens, Handscomb comes in six and Mitch at seven?

cricketbadger · « **Reply #97 on:** March 06, 2018, 07:41:34 PM »

So if the umpires bottle it and have nothing to report, the ban is being backed up by the video evidence surely. So back to my point, De Kock in the video does nothing wrong

six and out · « **Reply #98 on:** March 06, 2018, 08:01:59 PM »

Quote from: cricketbadger on March 06, 2018, 07:41:34 PM

So if the umpires bottle it and have nothing to report, the ban is being backed up by the video evidence surely. So back to my point, De Kock in the video does nothing wrong

From what i have read I don't think S.A. are actually disputing that QDK said something to Warner, it is all about why he said it etc... So he was always going to get some sort of charge.

skip1973 · « **Reply #99 on:** March 06, 2018, 10:33:12 PM »

Lock them both in a room and let them sort it out, at least one of them will be a lot quieter in the future.

rickjames · « **Reply #100 on:** March 07, 2018, 09:44:29 AM »

Aaaaaaand there you have it. If you give it out, expect to get it back

alexhilly1492 · « **Reply #101 on:** March 07, 2018, 09:46:38 AM »

Warner free to play, 3 demerit points given

Not sure about qdk

WalkingWicket37 · « **Reply #102 on:** March 07, 2018, 09:50:27 AM »

Quote from: rickjames on March 07, 2018, 09:44:29 AM

Aaaaaaand there you have it. If you give it out, expect to get it back

Oh look, a picture on the internet with no source.
This must 100% be exactly what happened...

rickjames · « **Reply #103 on:** March 07, 2018, 09:53:48 AM »

Quote from: WalkingWicket37 on March 07, 2018, 09:50:27 AM

Oh look, a picture on the internet with no source.
This must 100% be exactly what happened...

Here is your video footage

https://wwos.nine.com.au/2018/03/07/15/21/new-vision-of-de-kock-and-warner-sledge?ocid=social-WWOS

Are you satisfied?

Rob580 · « **Reply #104 on:** March 07, 2018, 10:09:20 AM »

Might have been saying

'Yeah, Fragrant Soup'

Just talking about what they're having for tea?....

Author Topic: Sa vs aus (Read 101904 times)

iand123

Re: Sa vs aus

ProCricketer1982

Re: Sa vs aus

six and out

Re: Sa vs aus

cricketbadger

Re: Sa vs aus

KD4

Re: Sa vs aus

six and out

Re: Sa vs aus

Manormanic

Re: Sa vs aus

cricketbadger

Re: Sa vs aus

six and out

Re: Sa vs aus

skip1973

Re: Sa vs aus

rickjames

Re: Sa vs aus

alexhilly1492

Re: Sa vs aus

WalkingWicket37

Re: Sa vs aus

rickjames

Re: Sa vs aus

Rob580

Re: Sa vs aus