Narrow Grain vs Wide Grain - Amateur Science
Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7

Author Topic: Narrow Grain vs Wide Grain - Amateur Science  (Read 27565 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

JK Lewis

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 584
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Narrow Grain vs Wide Grain - Amateur Science
« Reply #60 on: January 02, 2019, 10:57:00 AM »

Thoughts on shape/profile?

I really like that one at the top of your page 18. Looks great and I think you could get the same bat out of both clefts.  Should have them over to you mid next week.
Logged

jayralh

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 598
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Narrow Grain vs Wide Grain - Amateur Science
« Reply #61 on: January 02, 2019, 12:14:08 PM »

Thoughts on shape/profile?
Both should be same profile to compare later on. Personally I like full profile no to minimum concaving with wood spread all across.
Logged

edge

  • Moderator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4876
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Narrow Grain vs Wide Grain - Amateur Science
« Reply #62 on: January 02, 2019, 11:05:57 PM »

I'd either go for batmaker's choice on profile or something fairly generic, mid middle etc. so as not to skew people's judgement. Looking forward to seeing how this progresses, top stuff @JK Lewis !
Logged
HS: 156, BB: 7-20

bostoncricketer

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 296
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Narrow Grain vs Wide Grain - Amateur Science
« Reply #63 on: January 03, 2019, 12:55:23 AM »

The narrow grain has a lot of heartwood. Does that add to the weight and lesser mositure loss?
Logged

JK Lewis

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 584
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Narrow Grain vs Wide Grain - Amateur Science
« Reply #64 on: January 03, 2019, 07:46:04 AM »

The narrow grain has a lot of heartwood. Does that add to the weight and lesser mositure loss?

That's a good question. I've wondered about it myself, my suspicion is that heartwood is a little heavier. I can't prove it either way with this current test, but I'll look for suitable wood to experiment with.

In theory the new bat regs limit the top of the weight range that would be available. In practice it probably doesn't matter as few players want massively heavy bats anyway. But, if heartwood is actually heavier, then a completely heartwood bat might offer a few extra ounces that sapwood might not.
Logged

InternalTraining

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4792
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Narrow Grain vs Wide Grain - Amateur Science
« Reply #65 on: January 03, 2019, 06:18:08 PM »

In theory the new bat regs limit the top of the weight range that would be available.

That's interesting, I didn't know (or think) about this. What do you think is the upper limit that a bat maker/pro can get away with these days?
Logged

JK Lewis

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 584
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Narrow Grain vs Wide Grain - Amateur Science
« Reply #66 on: January 03, 2019, 07:47:12 PM »

That's interesting, I didn't know (or think) about this. What do you think is the upper limit that a bat maker/pro can get away with these days?

@DorsetDan is right, 3lb+ is still comfortably possible, and if you wanted even heavier you could use a less-dried cleft anyway, or a different type of wood. So in practise, as I said earlier, the new regs don't really have an effect on this. I just find it interesting to ponder what new limitations might mean. Personally I think there are better ways to achieve a rebalancing of bat and ball, but hey, that's a debate for another thread!
Logged

Northern monkey

Re: Narrow Grain vs Wide Grain - Amateur Science
« Reply #67 on: January 10, 2019, 03:36:19 PM »



Clefts arrived Justin

JK Lewis

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 584
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Narrow Grain vs Wide Grain - Amateur Science
« Reply #68 on: January 10, 2019, 05:44:03 PM »



Clefts arrived Justin

Excellent! Thanks mate, I'm excited to see the results.  :)
Logged

Northern monkey

Re: Narrow Grain vs Wide Grain - Amateur Science
« Reply #69 on: January 10, 2019, 06:21:46 PM »



We all ok with this shape?
Weights gonna be 2.11 ish finished,,,, there’s a lot of wood in that profile

tushar sehgal

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3874
  • Trade Count: (+8)
Re: Narrow Grain vs Wide Grain - Amateur Science
« Reply #70 on: January 10, 2019, 06:52:47 PM »



We all ok with this shape?
Weights gonna be 2.11 ish finished,,,, there’s a lot of wood in that profile

Looks a lovely shape...
Logged

JK Lewis

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 584
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Narrow Grain vs Wide Grain - Amateur Science
« Reply #71 on: January 10, 2019, 08:26:34 PM »



We all ok with this shape?
Weights gonna be 2.11 ish finished,,,, there’s a lot of wood in that profile

This is great. 2.11 should be good for most of us, and will give a decent middle.
Logged

JK Lewis

Re: Narrow Grain vs Wide Grain - Amateur Science
« Reply #72 on: February 14, 2019, 03:53:14 PM »

So just following up the brief post I added on the @Northern monkey thread yesterday, I thought I'd share some photos of another Wide Grain cleft I've got. All trees grow in the same way of course, but when the growth is so rapid (25mm per year or so), it makes it very easy to see how the growth builds and changes through the year.

Here's 3 photos of the same cleft, a 4 grainer. Growth is from Right to Left. As we all know, each grain indicates the period of dormancy during the winter months. Sap is low, the leaves have fallen, photosynthesis is not taking place, water is not being drawn up the trunk, growth is stopped. Then the spring arrives, the tree 'wakes up' and a period of intense growth takes place. As you can see, the tree bulks up with water so rapidly that the fibres of the wood are widely spaced. As summer arrives, there is less water available to draw up. The growth gradually slows and through the rest of the year the density of the fibres increases.







So, what then does this tell us about wide and narrow grain clefts? Clearly, there is a lot more water in WG timber, and less wood fibre. So it follows that when we dry these clefts out the weight is likely to be less than NG clefts. This is reflected in the current experiment, as Northern Monkey's careful notes demonstrate. But might this high growth also help explain the performance and longevity of WG bats? As we see, there are significant areas of lower density wood, which might be more 'springy and pingy', but may also be more likely to break up under the pressure of a hard ball.

Hopefully we can try to answer some of these questions when the 2 bats are ready to play. Come on Northern, have at it!
Logged

LBWCandidate

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 251
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Two 4's are better than a 6!
Re: Narrow Grain vs Wide Grain - Amateur Science
« Reply #73 on: February 14, 2019, 04:30:11 PM »

This is so exciting.  :)
Logged

JK Lewis

Re: Narrow Grain vs Wide Grain - Amateur Science
« Reply #74 on: October 31, 2019, 07:02:52 PM »

Evening all! And thanks for your patience on this, it really has taken ages - busy year, cricket season, family stuff etc etc. Anyway, you'll be happy to hear that I'm finally getting on with the next stages of this experiment. I had the great pleasure of paying a visit to the home and workshop of forum legend @Northern monkey yesterday afternoon. Excellent stuff, lovely to meet up with Mark and talk bats and batmaking with him. Dude's made his own press! Proper engineering project there, it just shows what you can achieve with a little thought

The Monkey has worked his magic with the 2 clefts - Narrow Grain and Wide Grain - see the photos below, which honestly don't do his talent justice at all. Despite the two clefts being so different, the bats are pretty much identical in profile and feel, and in their naked state weigh in just 46g different. Awesome job, really puts my amateur efforts in perspective. I need to bind the handles and put grips on, then both bats will end up around 2lb 11oz - 2lb 12oz.

Once complete, we can get on with the testing phase. My idea is that the bats be passed around between interested Forum members, so that anyone who wants to have a go with them, can do. If you'd like to be involved just post on this thread and include your location, and we can get the ball rolling through winter nets. You'd need to accept responsibility for using the bats appropriately and then making sure they are posted or delivered carefully to the next tester. Write a review, choose your favourite of the 2 bats, and at the end we can see if Narrow or Wide comes out on top.










Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7
 

Advertise on CBF