I’d agree over 30 with the bat is a good season but I think 30 with the ball is too high. That’s like bowling a side out for 300, which in my leagues would mean you lose most games. I reckon 15-20 with the ball is good.
Years ago when the pitches were slow and low anything above 25 with the bat was good and 10-15 with the ball
Good to see back anyway buddy
Generally I agree.
Obviously different leagues vary, due to different formats or pitches, but on an average year if you take the total runs scored by total wickets in most leagues I think you'd have a ratio of between 20 and 25. So a front-line bowler would want an average of under 20, and a front line batsman an average of over 30.
Hence in that kind of league, a good (but not unusual) bowling average might be 15, and a good (but not unusual) batting average might be 40. If you can do both at once, good for you.
To moan that someone with those kind of good-but-not-unusual stats is "playing below their standard" just comes across as sour grapes tbh.