ENG vs IND series
Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 ... 60 61 [62] 63 64 ... 134

Author Topic: ENG vs IND series  (Read 170485 times)

0 Members and 15 Guests are viewing this topic.

Bats_Entertainment

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5056
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ENG vs IND series
« Reply #915 on: February 17, 2021, 03:17:34 PM »

Any ideas why they were scheduled at all?

This is where we're heading.
Logged

alba caerulea

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1576
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Re: ENG vs IND series
« Reply #916 on: February 17, 2021, 03:23:26 PM »

This is where we're heading.

The NZ Tests weren't in the original schedule.

There was already a pretty full summer vrs SL, Pak and India which were arranged last year. The NZ Tests were only announced in the last month or so and weren't in the original ticket ballot. Im just wondering why that is

Not sure if it has anything to do with NZ qualifying for the Test Championship final
Logged

Neon Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2803
  • Trade Count: (+2)
    • Neon Cricket
Re: ENG vs IND series
« Reply #917 on: February 17, 2021, 03:26:59 PM »

Not sure if it has anything to do with NZ qualifying for the Test Championship final

I would guess this is why, they'll be coming over to the UK for it anyway so makes sense for them to play some more fixtures whilst they're here?
Logged
Email: adam@neoncricket.co.uk
Website: www.neoncricket.co.uk
Social Media: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram

Bats_Entertainment

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5056
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ENG vs IND series
« Reply #918 on: February 17, 2021, 03:27:46 PM »

Will be something to do with TV money? Shouldn't have been arranged if  England aren't able to put a full-strength team out.
« Last Edit: February 17, 2021, 03:29:58 PM by Bats_Entertainment »
Logged

Neon Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2803
  • Trade Count: (+2)
    • Neon Cricket
Re: ENG vs IND series
« Reply #919 on: February 17, 2021, 03:28:04 PM »

Although not too impressed having bought 12 tickets to Edgbaston that half the players won't even be involved... not that we'll care past 11.30am and 4 pints lol
Logged
Email: adam@neoncricket.co.uk
Website: www.neoncricket.co.uk
Social Media: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram

Mtown Don

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 161
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ENG vs IND series
« Reply #920 on: February 17, 2021, 03:28:21 PM »

This is where we're heading.

Not sure that this is fair during a 17-test calendar year?
Logged

alba caerulea

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1576
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Re: ENG vs IND series
« Reply #921 on: February 17, 2021, 03:29:27 PM »

I would guess this is why, they'll be coming over to the UK for it anyway so makes sense for them to play some more fixtures whilst they're here?

That seems to make sense.

Although less so if all the best players from both sides are in India.
Logged

alba caerulea

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1576
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Re: ENG vs IND series
« Reply #922 on: February 17, 2021, 03:31:06 PM »

Although not too impressed having bought 12 tickets to Edgbaston that half the players won't even be involved... not that we'll care past 11.30am and 4 pints lol

You chose the right one! I looked at the Lords match but thought better of it.

Surely Williamson as skipper wont prioritise IPL?
Logged

Bats_Entertainment

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5056
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ENG vs IND series
« Reply #923 on: February 17, 2021, 03:31:34 PM »

Not sure that this is fair during a 17-test calendar year?

Fair point.
Logged

beaver5

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 692
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ENG vs IND series
« Reply #924 on: February 17, 2021, 03:32:31 PM »

Good to see Silverwood has come out and apologised to Mo. Clear mistake to imply it was all Moeen's choice.
Logged

Bats_Entertainment

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5056
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ENG vs IND series
« Reply #925 on: February 17, 2021, 03:40:15 PM »

Okay, it's different now. This has been handled badly. But I still strongly disagree with the wider principle of players resting during England time rather than in franchise time.
Logged

Jimbo

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3252
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: ENG vs IND series
« Reply #926 on: February 17, 2021, 03:53:04 PM »

Maybe not ideal but it's a better situation than the Windies have ended up with where loads of their top players have decided to go off and play franchise cricket all the time because concessions weren't made to allow them to earn life changing sums of money for a short period of work.
Logged

Mtown Don

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 161
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ENG vs IND series
« Reply #927 on: February 17, 2021, 04:16:31 PM »

I have started to think since the beginning of the Silverwood era when it became clear that England would revert to a more traditional approach to Test cricket that the number of multi-format players should be minimised where possible to avoid these issues. I think Stokes is the only player who should unquestionably be in the Test and limited overs teams and Archer possibly.

This would avoid a situation like this where Moeen who is a peripheral Test player is being criticised for (potentially) prioritising 14+ games in the format in which  he is the most valuable to England moving forward as he is considered a marginally better option currently than his counterpart in the Test squad.

I suppose the counter argument is potential resentment amongst those who could potentially  get an IPL contract resenting being pigeon-holed as Test players.
Logged

SLA

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 781
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ENG vs IND series
« Reply #928 on: February 17, 2021, 04:25:36 PM »

I have started to think since the beginning of the Silverwood era when it became clear that England would revert to a more traditional approach to Test cricket that the number of multi-format players should be minimised where possible to avoid these issues. I think Stokes is the only player who should unquestionably be in the Test and limited overs teams and Archer possibly.

This would avoid a situation like this where Moeen who is a peripheral Test player is being criticised for (potentially) prioritising 14+ games in the format in which  he is the most valuable to England moving forward as he is considered a marginally better option currently than his counterpart in the Test squad.

I suppose the counter argument is potential resentment amongst those who could potentially  get an IPL contract resenting being pigeon-holed as Test players.

I think it's fine to play 2 formats (test and odi or T20 and odi) but noone should play all 3. It's too much and they're too different.
Logged
T20 cricket 1995-present, Saturday league cricket 1997-present.
L3 Cricket Coach, L2 Baseball Coach.
Running total: Countries played cricket in: 7. Counties played cricket in: 14

Kulli

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5410
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Herr Kaleun
Re: ENG vs IND series
« Reply #929 on: February 17, 2021, 05:16:39 PM »

I hate the idea that if you don't see money as the most important thing then you are somehow simple, naive or immature.
Who’s to say that some of the players don’t actually enjoy playing in the IPL as much as tests?
Logged
They won't catch us this time! Not this time! They haven't spotted us! No, they're all snoring in their bunks! Or, you know what? They're drinking at the bar, celebrating our sinking! Not yet, my friends. Not yet!
Pages: 1 ... 60 61 [62] 63 64 ... 134
 

Advertise on CBF