The pitch was dire, lets put that one to bed. 99% of people can agree on that.
What we can't agree on is how poor these England batsmen (couldn't care less really about India) are generally as one week they are 'world class' because they get a feather bed to wack on and the next when it's hard they simply can't bat. The question is.. where are the test quality batsmen going to come from going forwards ?
We have one player who avg over 40.. that's the root of the problem. irrespective of the peeps who will try and sell the 'Stokes avg this over 12 months' or 'Buttler avg that over 12 months'.. the fact is, we have shed loads of 30 something batsmen which tells everyone they aren't unto test standard. How do you fix that or do we accept white ball has corrupted the game forever? in which case there is no point worrying about red ball anyway because there is not much point in it
Stokes over the last 2 years is averaging around 50, i think and is in the top 10 for batting in the world rankings. So its fair to say his performances of late HAVE been world class. People wouldnt be wrong to say that.
Whether we sit down at the end of his career and say he was a world class Test batsman or a batsman capable of world class knocks is a different question. Would you suggest leaving Stokes out because he averages below 40?
What I don't understand is your constant whinging and moaning about the same subject over and over again. Maybe watch something else if the evolution of cricket offends you?
Can I ask a serious question - what were your emotions when Stokes played that knock at Headingley in the Ashes? For most the greatest knock ever seen by an Englishman.
Because guess what - without limited overs cricket that knock wouldn't have been possible and England would have lost. If you enjoyed that knock you are a massive hypocrite. And if you didn't you are the strangest cricket 'fan' ever to live