I still fail to see how England are going to fare any better? They have just as many question marks. Who's to say 200 won't be enough? Both teams have good bowling lineups, I would say Australia probably have more depth in the reserves and the huge advantage of a world class spinner. Whereas England have the advantage of Ben Stokes as an all-round option. Batting wise it's anyone's guess, but Australia on paper have a more experienced top order whereas englands middle order is stronger, but from what I've seen Australias tail is seemingly more competent than englands. Honestly I could go back and forth all day, but the reality is that it's unlikely to be as simple as one team "hammering" another.
Stephan ShemiltBBC Sport at Lord'sIf you're wondering where the names and numbers on the backs of shirts are, they won't be introduced until the Ashes, which is the first series in the ICC Test Championship.
ok i know how fickle we are and before i start following the score im gnna say this...lets back the lads, there are debutantes who are gonna be nervous and those playing for places.. if Roy fails that doesn't mean he isn't good enough..
England’s wheelhouse is 4-9 - Root, Buttler, Stokes, Bairstow, Ali and Woakes/Curran. The top three might be rubbish but if they can blunt the Aussie quick, the rest can express themselves