Bairstow will be trying his socks off to get his Test place back.
I’ve been told from a strong source that Gray Nics have renegotiated their player contracts, post COVID, to be based around payment per appearance instead of a set fee.Bairstow is the only player who has refused.
If that s true and GN were still prepared to sponsor after clearly using another brands bat(not saying others don't do that but it shouldn't be blatant) then it says a lot about Grays and nothing we didn't know about him.There seems to be a running theme of entitlement thru Bairstow not sure why that would be.All speculation of course just an opinion.Foakes must be in second place now as a keeper batsman for wherever we go in the winter. Sponsored by Gray Nics of course
Not sure it says anything about Bairstow other than that the deal he was offered by GN didn't suit him. Could be any number of reasons relating to his finances, personal situation, etc. For example, a deal based on appearances presumably could pay nothing if a player is injured long term. His situation might dictate that was an unacceptable level of risk. We simply don't know so I wouldn't be drawing any conclusions without evidence.
Your absolutely right and there will be no evidence, just an opinion. However you can form an opinion based on what you see and hear and I'm sticking to it.
You're entitled to your opinion but I'm not sure that turning down an appearance-based sponsorship deal is great justification to claim that Bairstow is entitled, etc.
There's been quite a lot of discussion on JB on this forum in the last year, so it's not just based on one thing. The guy is a very good short form cricketer, no doubt about that.