Custom Bats Cricket Forum

General Cricket => Latest Matches => Topic started by: Buzz on July 30, 2010, 10:24:46 AM

Title: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on July 30, 2010, 10:24:46 AM
Given there were no comments on this game yesterday (as everyone waits to see Talismans bat sale) i though I would start a thread on the new test match and offer a few thoughts...

Morgan looks good but got no chin music yesterday, so the jury can still stay out for a while - but is in fact technically much better than I realised
Pietersen needs (a lot of) time in the middle
Collingwood is a hero
Cook need runs - but his technique is better suited to Aus wickets than facing a hooping ball at Trent bridge

and the Pak bowling attack looks over-hyped

Finally, Kamran Akmal is the worst wicket keeper I have seen in almost all cricket - not counting beer/village cricket or when I had to stand behind the stumps in a few league games a couple of seasons ago.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on July 30, 2010, 10:32:25 AM
Buzz even though i never saw you keep, i think you may give poor old kamran a run for his money!

Interesting looking at the difference between cook and morgan, with just the flexing of the knees by morgan and trigger by cook.

Referrals make me laugh too with "the chat" after every lbw decision!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on July 30, 2010, 10:34:04 AM
Given there was no comments yesterday (as everyone waits to see Talismans bat sale) i though I would start a thread on the new test match and offer a few thoughts...

Morgan looks good but got no chin music yesterday, so the jury can still stay out for a while - but is in fact technically much better than I realised COULD POSSIBLY BE THE BEST TEST BATSMEN ENGLAND (IRELAND) HAVE PRODUCED IN A DECADE!
Pietersen needs (a lot of) time in the middle AGREED
Collingwood is a hero AGREED
Cook need runs - but his technique is better suited to Aus wickets than facing a hooping ball at Trent bridge. AGREED

and the Pak bowling attack looks over-hyped AGREED

Finally, Kamran Akmal is the worst wicket keeper I have seen in almost all cricket - not counting beer/village cricket or when I had to stand behind the stumps in a few league games a couple of seasons ago. - AGREED
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: RichW on July 30, 2010, 10:38:11 AM
The Pakistan attack especially Asif and Amer are excellent bowlers in conditions that suit them e.g. damp swinging seaming conditions however when conditions don't suit them, if the ball isn't swing and seaming that lack of pace can be exposed.

Having dropped yet another catch how can a professional team field so badly!!

I have no idea what has happened to DK surely he doesn't bowl this badly when he is taking bucket loads of wickets at Essex.

Assuming that everybody is fit and in decent form what would you England top 6 be in the ashes?
Personally, i know this might be unpopular, but i would have AS - AC - JT - KP - PC - MP play the extra bowler as I don't think our bowling will be as good in aus conditions.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on July 30, 2010, 10:38:37 AM
Nice spot - it is noticeable how still Morgan's head is and level his eyes are. That is not the case with at the moment, which is why Cook (and Pietersen) got out and Morgan got runs (I think)

As for my keeping, I earned the nick name "Tin Man" due to how much I creaked, which I think may be flattering on Akmal, who doesn't appear to bend down at all!! Calling him Teflon hands or symbols is an insult to no stick frying pans and percussion players respectively...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on July 30, 2010, 10:39:32 AM
I'm not one to feel sorry for pakistan, but you've gotta feel for Aamer. Another catch of his bowling in hurled to the ground.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on July 30, 2010, 10:40:51 AM
Rich - My Ashes team would be the one playing at the moment but with Bell at 5 and Peitersen at 3, Colly at 4 and either Trott or Cook opening depending on who gets more runs in this series.

I don't think playing the extra bowler will help as it would have to be one of Bresnan, Rashid or Shahzad - the first two would get hammered all over the park and the second has a poor fitness record, but will be pushing for Anderson's place.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on July 30, 2010, 10:43:32 AM
The Pakistan attack especially Asif and Amer are excellent bowlers in conditions that suit them e.g. damp swinging seaming conditions however when conditions don't suit them, if the ball isn't swing and seaming that lack of pace can be exposed.

Having dropped yet another catch how can a professional team field so badly!!

I have no idea what has happened to DK surely he doesn't bowl this badly when he is taking bucket loads of wickets at Essex.

Assuming that everybody is fit and in decent form what would you England top 6 be in the ashes?
Personally, i know this might be unpopular, but i would have AS - AC - JT - KP - PC - MP play the extra bowler as I don't think our bowling will be as good in aus conditions.
Kaneria is too good for county cricket, merely ordinary for Test cricket.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on July 30, 2010, 10:45:51 AM
The Pakistani fielding coach.......
(http://www.harborseal.com/images/harbor-seal.jpg)
Poor old Aamer - could have been a completelty different match had they taken their catches.
If you bring back younus and khan then the pakistani side looks extremely competitive!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on July 30, 2010, 10:46:25 AM
Its a tough choice who the the top 5 to be for ashes, i think as buzz said cook will be better in aus but then can you assume that or go with people who are making more runs?

Shame morgans out! Hopefully see swanny smash a few around now!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on July 30, 2010, 10:47:01 AM
Kaneria is too good for county cricket, merely ordinary for Test cricket.

is he the west brom of cricket??
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on July 30, 2010, 10:50:12 AM
Careful!!!

But prob true lol
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: longy0710 on July 30, 2010, 11:00:48 AM
My ashes team for OZ

Strauss
Trott
Pietersen
Bell
Collingwood
Morgan
Prior
Bresnan
Swann
Broad
Anderson
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on July 30, 2010, 11:02:41 AM
Longy, you are not seriously playing Bresnan ahead of Finn in Australia? That is an enormous call!

I wouldn't even have Bresnan in my touring party - his medium pace will get smashed all around Aus!!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: longy0710 on July 30, 2010, 11:07:59 AM
I would, reliable and will add strength to the batting line up

Plus i am a yorkshire lad so slightly biased, but i dont think finn is quite there yet, at least with bresnan what you see is what you get, he is pretty consistent
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on July 30, 2010, 11:10:44 AM
consistently average!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: RichW on July 30, 2010, 11:11:45 AM
Whilst I agree that Finn might not be ready yet Bresnan is very average in english conditons let alone in Aus.

What about 2 spinners play rashid or im quite a fan of Shazad using reverse swink which is important which the Kook ball
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Tumo on July 30, 2010, 11:12:10 AM
Dominoes! One goes, they all go this morning!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on July 30, 2010, 11:15:46 AM
I think the problem is, like they were saying on TMS yesterday,  we have 3 or 4 "possible" bowlers who could be taken on the tour but none of them are guaranteed a place.

Asif giving a little masterclass of line and length bowling........you dont need to bowl at 90+mph to be a dangerous fast bowler.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on July 30, 2010, 11:18:17 AM
Chaos in Nottingham!! But it has given the Paks a route back into the game.

I would play Rashid soon, but I think he needs to spend more time bowling and isn't quite ready for an Ashes trip (also I am not sure Flower and Strauss like him) So perhaps a winter playing grade cricket would be good for Rashid.
I am a big fan of Shahzad, but am not sure he is quite ready either if he was fitter I would be considering playing him ahead of Anderson (sacrilege I know) as I think he would be more effective in Aus - Finn I think is ready and is class - as he will show later today.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on July 30, 2010, 11:21:52 AM
Care to make a paypal wager on that???
£5 says he wont take more than 1 wicket today.......the gauntlet, albeit a rather small and insignificant one, has been laid down!!!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on July 30, 2010, 11:22:35 AM
Care to make a paypal wager on that???
£5 says he wont take more than 1 wicket today.......the gauntlet, albeit a rather small and insignificant one, has been laid down!!!!
you are on.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on July 30, 2010, 11:22:57 AM
Chaos in Nottingham!! But it has given the Paks a route back into the game.

I would play Rashid soon, but I think he needs to spend more time bowling and isn't quite ready for an Ashes trip (also I am not sure Flower and Strauss like him) So perhaps a winter playing grade cricket would be good for Rashid.
I am a big fan of Shahzad, but am not sure he is quite ready either if he was fitter I would be considering playing him ahead of Anderson (sacrilege I know) as I think he would be more effective in Aus - Finn I think is ready and is class - as he will show later today.
Finn is class? He's managed to bully Bangladesh, Australia are a different league - more so in Australia.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on July 30, 2010, 11:25:17 AM
Finn is going to be great in Aus - he bowls a great line and gets bounce (which is much harder to play than sideways movement) because he is about 15 ft tall.

The Bangers are irrelevant I agree

p.s. 6-23 this morning is terrible.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on July 30, 2010, 11:35:57 AM
I should have specified that i meant in todays play i dont think he'll get more than 1 wicket.......however, i'll have to stand by my word (rather foolishly)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on July 30, 2010, 11:39:06 AM
I should have specified that i meant in todays play i dont think he'll get more than 1 wicket.......however, i'll have to stand by my word (rather foolishly)
When you said "today" - I have assumed that you meant "in today's play"
I am not sure where else he will take a wicket - in the post play Ice Bath with SCJ Broad - I hope not!!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on July 30, 2010, 11:42:35 AM
:D I didnt even read my own post. Thats the problem with being a complete and utter retard!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on July 30, 2010, 11:43:54 AM
too busy thinking about the difference between an ancle and an ankle ;)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on July 30, 2010, 11:49:03 AM
karma me thinks :D
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: longy0710 on July 30, 2010, 12:24:12 PM
back to this game, i think swan will take 5-6 wickets in this game maybe even 10 in the match, big turn and variable bounce plus its his home ground..... could be carnage!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: kavi on July 30, 2010, 12:52:07 PM
Was Butt using a newbery?- saw the hammer edge sheet.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on July 30, 2010, 12:56:16 PM
I can't imagine why he would want to cover up the edges of his bat
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: RichW on July 30, 2010, 01:00:33 PM
Not watching because at work sadly! But doesn't Butt use Addidas?

On that note has anyone ever had a Addidas bat? Are they any good?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: kavi on July 30, 2010, 01:13:55 PM
He does use an addidas but he had the newbery scuff sheet on, so im assuming its a newbery stickered u as an addidas
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on July 30, 2010, 01:18:08 PM
On that note has anyone ever had a Addidas bat? Are they any good?

I have an Adidas Incurza Elite - it's a great quality bat! The willow is excellent and it has a gem of a middle - big middle too!
A couple of the guys at my club have borrowed it and have been impressed with the feel of it, and how the ball comes off it.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on July 30, 2010, 01:21:38 PM
that's it Finn my boy!!!
Umar Amin c Swann b Finn 2 (Pakistan 35-3) The towering Steven Finn enters the attack.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on July 30, 2010, 01:28:48 PM
I suppose you've already planned what to do with your winnings :D

Rich - I had a Pellara Elite, dead as a dodo and plenty of better value bats out there. I would imagine they have been pressed pretty damn hard. Few other players at my club have purchased them, much to my chagrin, and i have yet to hear a sweet sounding one.....they just sound hard and dead :(
I personally would reccomend many, many other bats before an Adidas bat.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on July 30, 2010, 01:30:22 PM
Looks like the Incurza is the only decent Adidas found so far!  ;)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Howzat on July 30, 2010, 01:33:53 PM
He does use an addidas but he had the newbery scuff sheet on, so im assuming its a newbery stickered u as an addidas

I have loads of bats with Hammer Edge on that arn't newbery
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Liam-SCCC on July 30, 2010, 01:40:04 PM
Unlucky Dom. Finn's second wicket.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Howzat on July 30, 2010, 01:42:55 PM
Buzzy is up a fiver!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on July 30, 2010, 01:43:03 PM
paypal details please Buzz!
Well, at least England are winning.......every cloud etc.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Howzat on July 30, 2010, 01:43:51 PM
Maybe you two could do a double or quits scenario ?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on July 30, 2010, 01:45:24 PM
given that was like taking candy from a baby - SS - how about double or quits that Pak are bowled out by tea? i.e. inside 55mins...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on July 30, 2010, 01:47:59 PM
SS - I bet you're tempted!  ;)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cakes on July 30, 2010, 01:49:10 PM
i think pakistan might be out for less than 65 :O
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on July 30, 2010, 01:49:38 PM
6 down now...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cakes on July 30, 2010, 01:53:17 PM
if malik is out soon i think they may well be out before tea 
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Howzat on July 30, 2010, 01:53:17 PM
Finny boy!! Another wicket!

Met Steve Finn last saturday, he was really happy to be in the England team and a really nice guy aswell
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on July 30, 2010, 01:54:50 PM
not at all - i dont think i could explain that kind of black hole in my finances to the better half :D
Me thinks you had some insider information.....i thought it was almost inconceivable that England could take 2/3 wickets against that rock solid batting line-up (in hindsight it was an incredibly stupid bet :D)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on July 30, 2010, 02:41:11 PM
How Shoaib Malik is all ways the fall guy for pakistani cricket is beyond me. He seems to be the only batsman that has any backbone.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on July 30, 2010, 02:43:07 PM
Was Butt using a newbery?- saw the hammer edge sheet.
Butt's agent, and his cousin, plays for my club and he gave one of Butt's rejects to one of the 2's opener's.

It's a plank and a half
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: GJ on July 30, 2010, 02:45:09 PM
Whats happened to mohammed yousuf as he seemed to be the only one in their batting line up that would show some grit?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on July 30, 2010, 02:48:21 PM
Whats happened to mohammed yousuf as he seemed to be the only one in their batting line up that would show some grit?

retired
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on July 30, 2010, 03:33:58 PM
Retired doesnt really tell the story - didnt he get booted out?
Here is a half decent link for the match for those without sky
http://supersportz2.blogspot.com/
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: alexrickyponting on July 30, 2010, 05:02:45 PM
Retired doesnt really tell the story - didnt he get booted out?
Here is a half decent link for the match for those without sky
[url]http://supersportz2.blogspot.com/[/url]


banned for life, then appealed and got un-banned, then retired. or something along those lines
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on July 31, 2010, 11:08:16 AM
banned for life, then appealed and got un-banned, then retired. or something along those lines
Banned for life, given the choice to appeal but he declined.

Few days ago said he was willing to come out of retirement.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cakes on July 31, 2010, 06:20:07 PM
why was he banned for life?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: alexrickyponting on July 31, 2010, 07:33:40 PM
why was he banned for life?

disruption in the dressing room apprantly
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on July 31, 2010, 07:37:16 PM
disruption in the dressing room apprantly
that's news to me mate, I heard it was off his ordinary captaincy skills
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: alexrickyponting on July 31, 2010, 07:46:14 PM
that's news to me mate, I heard it was off his ordinary captaincy skills


http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/other_international/pakistan/8559122.stm
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 06, 2010, 09:33:09 AM
Second test starts this morning... Pakistan have dropped the wicket keeper and MoYo has said (understandably) he isn't in any sort of condition to play in this match.
If England bowl first I think this game will be over in three days.
England 1 Andrew Strauss (capt), 2 Alastair Cook, 3 Jonathan Trott, 4 Kevin Pietersen, 5 Paul Collingwood, 6 Eoin Morgan, 7 Matt Prior (wk), 8 Graeme Swann, 9 Stuart Broad, 10 James Anderson, 11 Steven Finn

Pakistan 1 Salman Butt (capt), 2 Imran Farhat, 3 Azhar Ali, 4 Umar Amin, 5 Umar Akmal, 6 Shoaib Malik, 7 Zulqarnain Haider (wk), 8 Mohammad Amir, 9 Umar Gul, 10 Saeed Ajmal, 11 Mohammad Asif

oh and Salman Butt has won the toss and Pakistan will bat.
http://www.cricinfo.com/england-v-pakistan-2010/engine/current/match/426414.html
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on August 06, 2010, 09:37:27 AM
I'm not a betting man........but i cant see Finn taking more than 1 wicket today.......
Thanks for the quick reminder, time to tune into TMS!!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 06, 2010, 09:40:48 AM
Also Sri Lanka have fought back hard this morning against India and that game is shaping up to be a cracker - http://www.cricinfo.com/sri-lanka-v-india-2010/engine/current/match/456671.html
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 06, 2010, 09:45:56 AM
Sky HD is warming up.
Will be looking at the form of Cook and Pietersen....although I suspect that if these 2 do not perform with the bat again, it is only likely to be Cook who is possibly dropped!
But with the likes of Carberry, Lumb and Bopara all on excellent form, then should England be waiting for Cook and Pietersen to refind their form? Or should we be playing the players who are actually already in great form?
Would have been interesting to see what would have happened if Bell hadn't got his injury!!  ???
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on August 06, 2010, 09:48:53 AM
Sky HD ready for the 1st hour of the morning....net at Globe from 12-1 to fine tune my batting skills for the weekends big cup game then back to work afterwards!

Think KP could be warming the bench if Belly was fit?!?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 06, 2010, 09:52:35 AM
I reckon Cook would be the one jogging on with the drinks if Bell was fit!
They would have to amend the batting order slightly - open with Trott and Beel at 3? - but I'm pretty sure they'd drop Cook before the sacred KP?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 06, 2010, 09:54:45 AM
If Bell wasn't injured, Morgan wouldn't have been picked

In my view any suggestion of dropping either Cook or Pietersen is barking, unless we have people ready made who could open and average 45 and bat at 4 and average 49 over 50 tests as these guys do.
In any team there are batsman who are in form and out of form, but you also need to maintain consistency to ensure the best performance from a batsman.

Given how the team are playing, I can't see that there will be any changes to the team ahead of the ashes, so when Bell gets fit he will almost cetainly miss out - unless one of the batters gets no runs in this series.

I actually think that Trott shouldn't be pushed up to open, but if Cook is to be dropped, Bell should open in his place. That way the batting order stays as settled as possible, which is really important.
Personally I think that we have too many natural number 5's in our team, with Bell, Collingwood, Pieterson, Bopara and Trott all more naturally suited to the number 5 at test level.

There is zero chance of KP being dropped.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 06, 2010, 10:03:50 AM
Alot of that is true.
Just as well Bell wasn't fit, as we would have been deprived of some stunning batting from Morgan!!  :D

But will be interested to see what happens if Cook does fail again....with the form Carberry is in with the bat, and as he does open well and fields superbly, will he be tried out in the next Test to give an decent alternative to Cook?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Howzat on August 06, 2010, 10:14:13 AM
Anyone fancy a little paypal wager again? ;)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 06, 2010, 10:21:40 AM
Carberry is a really good play and a fantastic fielder - so my get a mention in dispatches.

Am happy to undertake a paypal wager, on condition the odds are as favourable as those offered by SS... :)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on August 06, 2010, 10:31:51 AM
Thinking retrospectively, it wasnt a wager at all.......it was a mugging and everybody watched as Buzz delighted in making me look like a fool!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Howzat on August 06, 2010, 10:32:45 AM
Buzz ... fiver says England wont bowl out pakistan today?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 06, 2010, 10:36:17 AM
Buzz ... fiver says England wont bowl out pakistan today?
you are on.

On the other game - India need 257 to win... anyone think that will do it?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Howzat on August 06, 2010, 10:37:11 AM
Great... Shilly this mugging is for you mate!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 06, 2010, 10:39:49 AM
Leo - I don't think the Pak's will make it to tea!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Howzat on August 06, 2010, 10:41:00 AM
2:25 today =
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_RVLfSMIB7K0/R1__zgDRhdI/AAAAAAAAEQc/PKMJlFxJ2zo/s400/001BadLight.jpg)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 06, 2010, 10:43:57 AM
1.5
 Randiv to Sehwag, OUT, The big wicket is down. Sehwag out for a duck. The crowd roar. And roar. What a game-breaking moment this. It was from round the stumps, it landed around off and it didn't turn in. Sehwag thought it would and went forward to defend. It took the edge and went to Mahela who pouches it safely. And he spreads his arms in joy!
 
 V Sehwag c DPMD Jayawardene b Randiv 0 (3b 0x4 0x6) SR: 0.00
 
Game on!

P.s. I think Finn should be given the new ball ahead of Broad
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on August 06, 2010, 10:45:02 AM
If murali was playing then Sri-Lanka win - but i think they might be a spinner short to bowl out the indians.
 Take him to the cleaners Leo :D
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on August 06, 2010, 10:55:11 AM
there's one for finn!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on August 06, 2010, 10:56:10 AM
Pakistan have gone form playing at everything, throwing bat and hands away form body last test match, to not hitting a bloody thing! They could still be skittled out for 80, just drag it out twice as long as last time!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Talisman on August 06, 2010, 11:09:30 AM
Will they make it to Lunch???
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Howzat on August 06, 2010, 11:12:23 AM
Will they make it to Lunch???
Will your bat pics make it before lunch?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 06, 2010, 11:14:39 AM
1 down so thought I would be safe to take dogs for a quick walk....come back and 3 down! Hmmmmm, I'm not a betting man but Buzz may have his nose in the lead at the moment!

And Talisman - bat pics indeed!
How is the laptop? You sorted?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Talisman on August 06, 2010, 11:51:57 AM
Yes, managed to get into safe mode, restore setting from 3 days ago, download Spybot and remove all Trojans, I hope that lasts...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: GJ on August 06, 2010, 11:55:41 AM
I dont really think this series can get much worse for pakistan. We'll probably see Inzy or akram come out of retirement next... Their batting line up just looks stupidly weak apart from Malik.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 06, 2010, 11:55:55 AM
Glad to hear it!

And 36 for 6 now! Hmmmm.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 06, 2010, 01:52:47 PM
Pak are 72 all out, Leo, it will be a pleasure doing business with you.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Howzat on August 06, 2010, 01:55:14 PM
Argh will send it over now... unless you fancy double or quits ;)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 06, 2010, 01:57:46 PM
Argh will send it over now... unless you fancy double or quits ;)
how about on the close of play score?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Howzat on August 06, 2010, 01:59:45 PM
Sure, you choose a score?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Howzat on August 06, 2010, 02:06:59 PM
well im confused now, whta ya mean
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 06, 2010, 02:08:29 PM
given that I am in the money, i am not sure the honour is with me, however, in this case I am going for 72 (for 2) with an early finish due to rain and bad light.

Sorry I deleted a post because I changed my mind!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Howzat on August 06, 2010, 02:10:16 PM
So how do I win and how do you win?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on August 06, 2010, 02:11:28 PM
whoever is closest i think!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 06, 2010, 02:12:27 PM
whoever is closest in runs - so your choice is either 71 or 73 I would have thought!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Howzat on August 06, 2010, 02:13:16 PM
73 :)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Colesy on August 06, 2010, 03:53:37 PM
Pak are 72 all out, Leo, it will be a pleasure doing business with you.

Good call


Pietersen dropped
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on August 06, 2010, 03:53:57 PM
anyone else think that umar gul looked like a 4 year old when they try catch??

looks like leo is getting even!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 06, 2010, 03:58:58 PM
come on the rain!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Colesy on August 06, 2010, 04:25:07 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rain_dance
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Colesy on August 06, 2010, 04:48:11 PM
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 09, 2010, 09:56:38 AM
Saeed Ajmal has some stones, and no word of a lie. He's talking to Nasser at the moment, a huge grin on his face. 'How did England bowl yesterday?' asks Nass "Very badly, very very badly. Anderson was easy for me, for 20 balls I had easy ones and twos, no problems at all." When the camera cuts back to the commentary box, Atherton, Warne and Gower are all in hysterics. Gower can hardly get a word out between his giggles. "At least he's not talking about getting the ball in good areas," chuckles Atherton.

England to polish this off before lunch anyone?

ok unlikely - but it will be a good morning's cricket.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 09, 2010, 10:15:07 AM
118 to win

anyone got a afro wig and 'tash?

I think Eng will win, but loose about 6 wickets in the process. Swann to hit the winning runs, with Collie at the other end...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Alvaro on August 09, 2010, 10:30:31 AM
cook gone...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: RoCo Da Pixie on August 09, 2010, 10:35:02 AM
cook gone...


Dropped shortly? He is looking out of form
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Alvaro on August 09, 2010, 10:40:17 AM
i feel he won't be dropped
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 09, 2010, 10:41:31 AM
I think Cook will get the rest of this series to prove himself, seems they really want him in the team.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Alvaro on August 09, 2010, 10:52:24 AM
he is vice captain ...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 09, 2010, 10:57:39 AM
I think Cook will get the rest of this series to prove himself, seems they really want him in the team.
Tough one this - Cook was our best batsman in Bangladesh - has a few bad days and people are calling for his head - having said that, in Bangaladesh opening is definitely the best place to bat.

Carberry is the next man in as a potential opener - and is in form, so he may get another go. The question is: do the selectors think he is going to come good? Cook has made a habit of being an "all or nothing player" he either gets out cheaply or gets in and makes a biggy.
The fact is when Cook goes back to Essex he always gets a mountain of runs (except for the start of this season interestingly.)
Personally I would stick with him, but if Bell was around, I would have him open the batting instead. As mentioned elsewhere, I am not a fan of moving Trott up to open - and I also think Cook will do well in Aus. Tough on Carberry - maybe, but I have this feeling that he is a journeyman pro who is having a decent run, rather than a true star in the making.
It makes no difference that he is vice captain, Kamran Akmal was VC of the Pak's
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 09, 2010, 11:03:47 AM
He looks very low on confidence. I think if it wasnt an Ashes winter they might have done to Cook what they did to Strauss a couple of years ago in NZ. Give him a winter off and a bit of a break and come back refreshed for the summer.

Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Watsontotty on August 09, 2010, 11:04:07 AM
They wont be quick to drop cook as he is seen as part of the senior set up and seen by many of the regime as the next England captain. Difficult to go along with this especially with the number of problems he has on a regular basis regarding his technique unless he finds his form and gets rid of the over technical side of batting he wont be a future captain in my book.

Very good player with far too many issues regarding his technique and style, constantly changing the way he plays and messing around with his game, when your in the middle of a test series you shouldn't have any issues regarding your technique or if you have then you shouldn't be in the team.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Watsontotty on August 09, 2010, 11:08:03 AM
Tough one this - Cook was our best batsman in Bangladesh - has a few bad days and people are calling for his head - having said that, in Bangaladesh opening is definitely the best place to bat.

Carberry is the next man in as a potential opener - and is in form, so he may get another go. The question is: do the selectors think he is going to come good? Cook has made a habit of being an "all or nothing player" he either gets out cheaply or gets in and makes a biggy.
The fact is when Cook goes back to Essex he always gets a mountain of runs (except for the start of this season interestingly.)
Personally I would stick with him, but if Bell was around, I would have him open the batting instead. As mentioned elsewhere, I am not a fan of moving Trott up to open - and I also think Cook will do well in Aus. Tough on Carberry - maybe, but I have this feeling that he is a journeyman pro who is having a decent run, rather than a true star in the making.
It makes no difference that he is vice captain, Kamran Akmal was VC of the Pak's


Very very interesting statement that concerning Cook in Auz, the Aussies don't rate cook at all and his record against them is very poor i think so i don't expect him to do much and with his current problems i wouldn't pick him.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 09, 2010, 11:08:27 AM
I still think that the powers will have half an eye on the Somerset v Hampshire game to see how Carberry does!
Or they should be at least! And who knows whagt's in the head of these selectors!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Alvaro on August 09, 2010, 11:12:02 AM
And who knows whagt's in the head of these selectors!!

consistency? backing their men?

Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 09, 2010, 11:12:09 AM
He looks very low on confidence. I think if it wasnt an Ashes winter they might have done to Cook what they did to Strauss a couple of years ago in NZ. Give him a winter off and a bit of a break and come back refreshed for the summer.

I agree - and I think it would do him the power of good too. Make him play some grade cricket in Aus for a winter. It did Ravi Bop no harm spending last winter in NewZealand too...

On the technical aspects - I agree - I think he has been "over coached" and needs to clear his mind rather than thinking about his wonkey trigger movements, which is causing his head to dip at the moment of release, hence he can't play the moving ball and he has no control of where the ball is in relation to his off stump. He needs to ditch the trigger movement and stand still.
Easy for me to say from here. When I coached him at his prep school (aged 12) he didn't have any of these issues...!
Hoskers, i know you are a fan of the Carberry.

In Aus Cook averages 27 - during the worst tour in living memory from an Englaish perspective with a terrible skipper. I wouldn't hold that against him
http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/11728.html?class=1;home_or_away=2;host=2;opposition=2;template=results;type=allround

I couldn't care less who the Aussies rate or not. They keep picking Marcus North and who is that non spinning left arm slow pie chucker they pick too?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: procricket on August 09, 2010, 11:28:59 AM
i think it is unlikely but if cook is dropped i doubt it will be carberry replacing him.

i would bring in a youngster not many would pick but i would

Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 09, 2010, 11:31:05 AM
i think it is unlikely but if cook is dropped i doubt it will be carberry replacing him.

Dave - I agree but, which rabbit do you think they will pull from the hat then if Cook was to be "rested"?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 09, 2010, 11:32:26 AM
It's not only that I'm a fan of Carberry - it's also that I believe that they play a lot of cricket over the season, and sometimes a player just hits bad form for various reason. So the normal resolution would be to rest them at International level and let them play themselves back into form at first class level.
And also a strong believer that you should normally play the in form players if possible, assuming there is a decent alternative to that bat placing! Therefore agree with you that the batting order should not be changed if humanly possible, as this can upset the mental attitude of the batsmen who get moved around. But if Cook is (obviously) out of form, and Carberry looks to be in good form and is a genuine opener, then that would surely be worth doing.
There is also the attitude that we should stick with Cook until he hits form again at International level, but if he still doesn't in 2 or 3 tests time, then what do we do then? At least if we test Carberry against Pakistan, then Cook gets a rest at that level and can go away and work on hitting good form again! And we can see for sure if Carberry is a true alternative to Cook as an opener?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: procricket on August 09, 2010, 11:33:02 AM
hales and open trott and bring in hales at around 5 or 6
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Watsontotty on August 09, 2010, 11:34:17 AM
They wont drop cook in my opinion, if they did drop him and say he didn't go to Oz you would need a replacement opener and don't think they rate Carberry. You cant got on tour with only 2 openers in the squad, so they will stick with cook and have Trott as cover for an opener then fit bell back in when fit.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: procricket on August 09, 2010, 11:36:34 AM
hales for me seen him once and stood out would be a bit of a gamble but like morgan he just has something special i think
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 09, 2010, 11:38:30 AM
hales and open trott and bring in hales at around 5 or 6

For those not following Notts - http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/content/player/249866.html
I think that is a big ask for him to step up - that's not to say he couldn't - but I have never heard of him before or seen him play so can't really comment
I would go for Carberry, for the reasons outlined by Pete - if I had to make the change, otherwise i would basically do what Watsontotty says above (other than open with Bell) for the winter
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: procricket on August 09, 2010, 11:43:15 AM
good discusson but similar to nick speak (rich you remember him) scored around 2000 championship runs in a season but selectors were not interested i think same with carberry if they wanted him he would have played more by now and if there was anybody else good out there then they would have been brought in i suspect.

hales would be a gamble yes but at what price no disrespect to Pakistan but i would bring in a few hopefuls now without doubt especially batsman there attack is not to shabby at all.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Watsontotty on August 09, 2010, 11:49:01 AM
Yer i wouldn't open with Bell either and I'm not sure on Carberry as in all fairness I've not seen that much of him, seen even less of the lad Hales so definitely cant comment on him. On carberry I've heard some very positive things from people ex players i respect and they feel he is a very very good player.

Had Bell been fit a decision would have had to be made for sure and think in a way the selectors are happy they don't have to.

Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Watsontotty on August 09, 2010, 11:52:32 AM
good discusson but similar to nick speak (rich you remember him) scored around 2000 championship runs in a season but selectors were not interested i think same with carberry if they wanted him he would have played more by now and if there was anybody else good out there then they would have been brought in i suspect.

hales would be a gamble yes but at what price no disrespect to Pakistan but i would bring in a few hopefuls now without doubt especially batsman there attack is not to shabby at all.

I certainly do remember Nick Speak bud and he is out in Australia or at least he was last time i spoke to him, obviously being a Lancashire fan i watched him bat many many times and at the time England were a closed shop. England look to identify players on temperament rather than ability ?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Alvaro on August 09, 2010, 11:52:57 AM
Dave,

I think Hales has an outside chance of being picked to T20 this winter. Have seen him a couple of times and is still a bit raw. Morgan is a different case in that he was more experienced (in ODIs at least) before he played internationals.

Cook is a back foot player - this should suit Down Under. How about Steve Davies? He will go to Oz as back-up keeper and looks a real exciting opener for Surrey.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: alexrickyponting on August 09, 2010, 12:24:53 PM
Dave,

I think Hales has an outside chance of being picked to T20 this winter. Have seen him a couple of times and is still a bit raw. Morgan is a different case in that he was more experienced (in ODIs at least) before he played internationals.

Cook is a back foot player - this should suit Down Under. How about Steve Davies? He will go to Oz as back-up keeper and looks a real exciting opener for Surrey.

too right about davies :)
on another note: alex hales used to go to my school :D
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 09, 2010, 01:32:46 PM
well that was pretty clinical...

2-0 with 2 to play.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on August 09, 2010, 01:44:02 PM
Had to post this........from the cricket with balls website, i think he has to be the best cricket blogger out there.

"In a corner of a room, Ijaz Butt was crying.

The sounds of sobbing brought a startled flunky running. “Master! Master! Whatever is the matter?”

“Oh Salman,”, Butt wailed, “It’s all gone wrong”

“How, Master? How?”

“No-one finds us funny anymore. Salman”

“Surely not, Master”

“It’s true, Salman. We’ve tried it all – three captains who hated each other, suspending people and letting them come back right away, everything. We even gave Kamran Akmal wicketkeeping gloves!”

Salman is, by now, laughing so hard he can hardly breathe.

“But <gasp> Master, that’s <wheeze> hilarious <sob>!”

“No, Salman, it isn’t. Not any more. It was, but it is not now. No-one is laughing.”

“Might I make a humble suggestion, Master”

“Oh, go on. It can’t be worse than my idea of recalling Mohammed Yousuf”

“That’s just it, Master. Now we’ve recalled him, let’s arrange for him to only arrive the day before the Test. And then to claim that all of the flying has made him too tired to play”

“Go on.”

“And then we drop Kamran, and replace him with someone who has never taken a catch in international cricket”

“So, just like Kamran, but with the potential to be even worse?”

“Exactly, Master!”

“Salman, you’re a genius. Make it so!”
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 18, 2010, 07:59:12 AM
Going to be a good day at the oval today and certainly a good toss to win, given that Bill Gordon has confirmed that the pitch has been more traditionally prepared than last years bunsen.

Teams will be: England: Andrew Strauss (capt), Alastair Cook, Jonathan Trott, Kevin Pietersen, Paul Collingwood, Eoin Morgan, Matt Prior (wkt), Graeme Swann, Stuart Broad, James Anderson, Steven Finn.

Pakistan: Imran Farhat, Salman Butt (capt), Azhar Ali, Mohammad Yousuf, Umar Akmal, Yasir Hameed ,Kamran Akmal (wkt), Mohammad Aamer, Saeed Ajmal, Mohammad Asif, Wahab Riaz.

Great to see Kamran Akmal back, he really has worked hard for his recall (erhemm!)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on August 18, 2010, 08:01:45 AM
Looking forward to it Sky HD fired up and cup of tea at the ready for the 1st hours play.....whos going to be batting 1st?

Think England may stick them in if we win the toss given Pakistans fragile position and confidence in their batting line up at the moment!!! may well be proven wrong tho
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Riddy on August 18, 2010, 08:02:07 AM
KP will score a ton in the test
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on August 18, 2010, 08:03:25 AM
outrageous confidence there mate i like it.....neck on the line stuff!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on August 18, 2010, 08:03:43 AM
What about cook? :) must be some good odds on him gettin to the triple figures!!!???
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 18, 2010, 08:04:27 AM
Whoever wins the toss will bat first. The weather forcast for today is good, then for tomorrow is cloudy, with damp conditions on friday, before being sunny on Sat... That screams bat first, as does the Oval pitch.

I would love to see KP score a biggie. I also want to see Cookie get a score too.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Simmy on August 18, 2010, 08:33:31 AM
i love watching kp bat when hes on it ! fantastic player
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on August 18, 2010, 08:35:13 AM
I hope Yousuf scores a ton. Am eagerly waiting to see him in the middle wearing Xiphos pads, Nitro gloves and not sure of his bat
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 18, 2010, 08:40:02 AM
These mums and dads are shocking.

(http://i895.photobucket.com/albums/ac151/buzzrockport/shockingpads.jpg)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on August 18, 2010, 10:02:20 AM
Second ball of the match....... two byes through Akmal!  Looks like business will resume as usual then :D
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on August 18, 2010, 10:06:32 AM
and cook scratching around like a cat in the litter tray :)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on August 18, 2010, 10:08:03 AM
well at least we may get entertained now!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on August 18, 2010, 10:08:42 AM
And there goes cook
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on August 18, 2010, 10:09:56 AM
even more predictable than Akmal dropping a ball is Cook getting out cheaply.......another failure, but it looks like it could be tough conditions today!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on August 18, 2010, 10:14:57 AM
think cook could make any bowling/conditions look good in current form...lack of footwork leading to some horrible positions of the bat etc
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: procricket on August 18, 2010, 10:28:42 AM
haider must be injured surely...

the clown that is akmal kamran should not be allowed near a test again...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on August 18, 2010, 10:34:23 AM
Yes he has a fractured finger
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on August 18, 2010, 10:35:57 AM
Thanks to Broad for that
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on August 18, 2010, 10:36:42 AM
Tactical I think
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on August 18, 2010, 10:37:12 AM
from what iv seen the pakistan keepers dont use their hands much anyway??!!  :-[
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on August 18, 2010, 10:41:39 AM
It's quite sad for the 24 year old lad. Broad just got away with £3000 fine but it could be his last test for sometime
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 18, 2010, 10:49:15 AM
hold on - Broad didn't break the guy's finger, it was broken already, the journalists just using this as PR spin. It was then agrovated in training. Heider will be back, although I (slightly contraversially) don't think he is much cop either.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on August 18, 2010, 10:51:14 AM
It wasn't that serious but after Broads incident it got worst as the ball struck that damaged finger.

LOL umpires seems to be on drugs today
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on August 18, 2010, 10:52:07 AM
In comes Pietersen who has great record at this ground
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 18, 2010, 10:53:09 AM
Strauss is a disgrace. blatant cheating with UDRS in use
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 18, 2010, 10:55:28 AM
Oh come on, he is allowed to stand his ground - it is a test match not a Sunday village game!

Strauss is a disgrace. blatant cheating with UDRS in use
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on August 18, 2010, 10:55:51 AM
It's not in the spirit but how many batsmen at any level walk these days less than 10% I would say not saying it's right just the way things are people don't walk can't think of many at international level that do gilchrist always used too
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 18, 2010, 11:04:46 AM
Oh come on, he is allowed to stand his ground - it is a test match not a Sunday village game!


this match has reviews. he would've known he'd be given out, yet just stood there.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on August 18, 2010, 11:08:36 AM
IMO its upto the umpires and system in palce to give the batsmen out at this level....the people are in palce to make the decisions so its upto them to make them.

Times have changed unfortunately and people walking may sadly be a thing of the past, disgrace is a pretty harsh word to use as he stayed put until given out which hes entitled to do.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Alvaro on August 18, 2010, 11:10:40 AM
Maybe the Haider 'edge' that so irked Broad and wasn't given via UDRS in the last Test was in Strauss's mind. The people interpreting the technology are still fallilble... England didn't review, so all they have lost is a wicket.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Tumo on August 18, 2010, 11:14:09 AM
Just seen KP watching the bowler at the non-strikers end to see where his foot lands. Very smart thinking considering the reviews and the necessity of the delivery to be legal when being reviewed...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on August 18, 2010, 11:15:56 AM
I don't think you can call a review if you think it's a no ball the third umpire can check if the umpire asks as they have just done
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on August 18, 2010, 11:16:07 AM
No one likes to walk away or get out. Everyone likes to carry on
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on August 18, 2010, 11:20:39 AM
Unlucky Collingwood
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on August 18, 2010, 11:20:49 AM
struggling a bit now with Colley on his way back to the hut as well!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on August 18, 2010, 11:24:52 AM
Only positive is that it gives Morgan a chance to show what he can do under pressure
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on August 18, 2010, 12:18:54 PM
Not the best mornings play from England this summer. Well bowled Pakistan though, i have a feeling this could be a tight match.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: mars on August 18, 2010, 12:23:11 PM
Yep. Pakistan have bowled well. Especially Wahab Riaz on his debut. Swings it away from the right hander and bangs it into the deck. Decent pace.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 18, 2010, 12:58:45 PM
Eng are up a creek now, with very little paddle left.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 18, 2010, 01:32:20 PM
Tuffers is giving batting tips on TMS, talking about how to play the moving ball, using Prior as his example.

I think he has been reading our forum ;)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 18, 2010, 03:44:10 PM
I don't support Pak, but what a performance by Wahab Riaz on debut 5 fer
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: procricket on August 18, 2010, 09:33:32 PM
think prior today showed why he is our test batsman classy innings and makes it hard to drop him for the chosen forum one(kieswetter) although i suspect davies is possible number 2....

is there a more imporved player than prior his keeping has come on leaps and bounds and his batting looks stronger than ever....

possible best batsman/keeper in test cricket???
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 18, 2010, 09:47:59 PM
think prior today showed why he is our test batsman classy innings and makes it hard to drop him for the chosen forum one(kieswetter) although i suspect davies is possible number 2....

is there a more imporved player than prior his keeping has come on leaps and bounds and his batting looks stronger than ever....

possible best batsman/keeper in test cricket???
I'd have Dhoni or McCullum before Prior.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: procricket on August 18, 2010, 09:49:43 PM
Dhoni is his only contender McCullum in one day cricket fine but in test cricket just is not in the same mould as Prior as a batsman...

Prior has been showing his class with the bat he must work hard at all form as his keeping has come on leaps and bounds....

Dhoni is a fine batsman i agree but his average is based on playing in sub continent flat tracks so his average is hard to interpite
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Tumo on August 18, 2010, 09:52:08 PM
I'm still unsure as to what people see in Dhoni! I remain unconvinced as far as his keeping abilities go, his batting is good when it comes off but it can be hit and miss. Admittedly, there is a shortage of a high class keeper/batsmen around, Brendan Mac is probably up there with Matty Prior, Prasanna Jayawardene is a hell of a keeper but an average bat, but it depends what sides want in their keeper! We can't all have a Gilly!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: procricket on August 18, 2010, 09:55:02 PM
tumo i agree jaywardene is currently the best keeper of test playing keepers

Dhoni is a average keeper at best...

i suspect tim paine is waiting to do it though and looks a good bet...(he too is not the best keeper in the world either)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Riddy on August 18, 2010, 09:57:12 PM
prior is the way forward,.,, and he is keeping is quality now as well
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 18, 2010, 10:15:43 PM

Dhoni is a average keeper at best...

Dhoni is far better than Prior Dave.

2007 in England Dhoni's keeping was 100 times better than Prior's.

Furthermore, its tougher to keep on low sub continental pitches than more lively English pitches.

With regards to Dhoni's batting, two of his hundreds have been match saving efforts, his 148 vs Pakistan( a far better attack than the current Pakistani attack) and 109 vs Sri Lanka when the Lankans where all over India.

Also its not Dhoni's fault he plays in India is it? He is Indian after all.

Dhoni can score runs again the best sides, unlike Prior who loves to dip his bread vs the ordinary West Indies side.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on August 18, 2010, 10:18:06 PM
in 2007 maybe mate but we are talking 2010 where prior is ten times better than he was!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: procricket on August 18, 2010, 10:20:57 PM
harder to keep in india than england...

are you a keeper i suspect not it hard to keep in england due to the amount of after swing which you do not get much of in india

dhoni is not a great keeper good batsman and prior is improving all the time in both....


also what prior doing at the moment make no mistake the pakistan bowling is as good a attack as anything in world cricket......

Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 18, 2010, 10:22:07 PM
in 2007 maybe mate but we are talking 2010 where prior is ten times better than he was!
Still not in Dhoni's league pal
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on August 18, 2010, 10:23:49 PM
It's a close run thing I think! Think prior is improving and dhoni isn't so maybe soon it'll be very close!?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 18, 2010, 10:25:29 PM
It's a close run thing I think! Think prior is improving and dhoni isn't so maybe soon it'll be very close!?
How do you work that one out? Dhoni works as hard as any other Indian player, otherwise he would've been binned along time ago.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on August 18, 2010, 10:29:03 PM
Why would he have been binned? he could be not improving and still be the best?
I phrased it wrong anyway. I meant I Think prior is improving at a faster rate than dhoni.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: procricket on August 18, 2010, 10:31:03 PM
Sorry but Dhoni is a flat track bully what have we seen of him in England????

Not a lot iindeed we all have opinions but i suspect as i always have championed Prior is as good as i said as Dhoni in test cricket and i will stick to that

stats alone it hard dhoni on flat wickets for half his games and to say prior has only done it v the windies is slight harsh look at this series Pakistan are no mugs with the ball at all....

Dhoni in one day cricket as a keeper has only one rival Sanga and in truth sanga all day long but in test cricket it is without doubt Prior is his number one competitior as world number 1 keeper/batsman


they both have identical test records withthe bat very close indeed
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Tumo on August 18, 2010, 10:35:28 PM
Dhoni is far better than Prior Dave.

2007 in England Dhoni's keeping was 100 times better than Prior's.

Furthermore, its tougher to keep on low sub continental pitches than more lively English pitches.

With regards to Dhoni's batting, two of his hundreds have been match saving efforts, his 148 vs Pakistan( a far better attack than the current Pakistani attack) and 109 vs Sri Lanka when the Lankans where all over India.

Also its not Dhoni's fault he plays in India is it? He is Indian after all.

Dhoni can score runs again the best sides, unlike Prior who loves to dip his bread vs the ordinary West Indies side.

Strong Pakistan attack? abdul razzaq is distinctly ordinary, shoaib ahktar took 1/100 in that game and danesh kaneria was affectively nullified by kamran akmal behind the stumps. prior was facing a new quick, who was an unknown quantity, mohammed aamer who continues to be the best quick bowling prospect in world cricket, and mohammed asif at his canniest and most cunning. no, it's not his fault he plays in india, but the amount of flat tracks will undoubtedly inflate averages. He averages 49.41 in asia compared to 32.9 outside, which is a big difference. dhoni's keeping is worse than prior's now, and actually, it should be easier to keep in the subcontinent, if your technique is right as you rise with the ball, so if the ball doesn't rise then neither do you, whereas you have to deal with the swinging ball here, swinging both ways and having to compensate as such with edges and the like...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 18, 2010, 10:37:13 PM
Sorry but Dhoni is a flat track bully what have we seen of him in England????

Not a lot iindeed we all have opinions but i suspect as i always have championed Prior is as good as i said as Dhoni in test cricket and i will stick to that

stats alone it hard dhoni on flat wickets for half his games and to say prior has only done it v the windies is slight harsh look at this series Pakistan are no mugs with the ball at all....

Dhoni in one day cricket as a keeper has only one rival Sanga and in truth sanga all day long but in test cricket it is without doubt Prior is his number one competitior as world number 1 keeper/batsman
Firstly Dhoni was outstanding in the 2007 series. Scores two 50's and averaged 50+

Dhoni's streets ahead of Sangakkara in ODI's. 
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: procricket on August 18, 2010, 10:38:27 PM
as what do not tell me dhoni is a better batsman than sanga please and i would say sangga is a better keeper than both dhoni and prior

Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 18, 2010, 10:41:15 PM
Strong Pakistan attack? abdul razzaq is distinctly ordinary, shoaib ahktar took 1/100 in that game and danesh kaneria was affectively nullified by kamran akmal behind the stumps. prior was facing a new quick, who was an unknown quantity, mohammed aamer who continues to be the best quick bowling prospect in world cricket, and mohammed asif at his canniest and most cunning. no, it's not his fault he plays in india, but the amount of flat tracks will undoubtedly inflate averages. He averages 49.41 in asia compared to 32.9 outside, which is a big difference. dhoni's keeping is worse than prior's now, and actually, it should be easier to keep in the subcontinent, if your technique is right as you rise with the ball, so if the ball doesn't rise then neither do you, whereas you have to deal with the swinging ball here, swinging both ways and having to compensate as such with edges and the like...
Quick to point out the drop in Dhoni's average but if you remove Prior's bashing of the Windies then he averages 35.

Prior's keeping decent at best
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 18, 2010, 10:42:54 PM
as what do not tell me dhoni is a better batsman than sanga please and i would say sangga is a better keeper than both dhoni and prior


Dhoni's ODI batting is better than Sangakkara's proven by their records.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: procricket on August 18, 2010, 10:46:53 PM
this is what the forum about good debate with no real anwser only debate...

jeet i like your chat India are a good side with good players including Dhoni

But so are England Prior is up there with the best mate..

ever herd your only as good as your last knock 

today prior had one of his best for england no doubt i sure pete hosk who was there can clarify



sangakkara facing the best bowler with a new ball or dhoni clubbing the 5th bowler with the field spread...

never just look at averages but sanga are in diffrent leagues as batsman averages only tell half the story.....

Got to admit though dhoni is a good finisher only one better in world cricket(wind up time)

so today prior is king and in form
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 18, 2010, 11:14:36 PM
Dave just one question, you claim Dhoni's a flat track bully and Sangakkara is God's gift to wk/batsman, yet of Sangakkara's 23 Test 100's, 19 are scored in Asia. Seems to me that Sangakkara is a flat track bully as well.....
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: procricket on August 18, 2010, 11:19:59 PM
never said he was not but look at the number of not outs in dhoni odi record...


there diffrent players no doubt but i know which one is a better batsman..

to be honest mate i would swap all 4 cricketers for tendulkar though.........


morgan best finisher in world one day/20 20 cricket??????

only kidding nobody can knock dhoni in one day cricket
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 18, 2010, 11:23:02 PM

to be honest mate i would swap all 4 cricketers for tendulkar though.........
 
Finally we agree on something!!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 19, 2010, 07:27:15 AM
Intersting thread and discussions - I think Prior is has become a better keeper than Dhoni and may probably be a better batsman.

But - and this is a biggy... (for me)

Dhoni is a brilliant captain and, I suspect, has far more between his ears than Prior and on that basis in my book would get picked above Prior in all forms of cricket.

Regardless, next summer when India tour England we will really see who is the master - a question for Jeet - Will Dravid even make it?

India seems to be rebuilding while the next 12 months could be a great period for English Cricket (or for those fed on a diet of 1990's English cricket we expect it to go horribly wrong - but are fed thanks to the little voice of hope and the fact that Andy Flower is a very special coach - even Duncan Fletcher is jealous of him, just read the bitterness in his guardian articles and the lack of Eng players in the ICC cricketer of the year nominations).

We will know more today when play gets underway. Pak are well on top and England will have to bowl with patience, control and luck to get back into the game. If England try too hard for wickets they will get carted.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Simmy on August 19, 2010, 07:45:54 AM
alec stuart FTW!!!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 19, 2010, 07:53:03 AM
alec stuart FTW!!!!

I assume you are referring to Alec James Stewart, England's finest?

When Stewart was in full flow, there were few who could live with him. Relying on touch, he was in his element against the quicks, cover-driving with a neat flourish and pulling with panache - most memorably when he thundered two centuries during England's storming of fortress Bridgetown in 1993-94.

(http://i895.photobucket.com/albums/ac151/buzzrockport/thegaffer2.jpg)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Johnny on August 19, 2010, 07:56:06 AM
Blimey - that is on old, old photo - loving those Slaz graphics! I had a V12 from the same generation. I didn't realise Stewart was sponsored by Slaz before he was sponsored by Kook before he was sponsored by Slaz again
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 19, 2010, 08:05:49 AM
it was pretty much the oldest one I could find on Cricinfo, it is from West Indies v England, 1st Test, Jamaica, Feb 25th 1990
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on August 19, 2010, 08:09:16 AM
Aren't those the new ayrtek gloves tom?? ;)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 19, 2010, 08:40:24 AM
Will Dravid even make it?
Simple answer in no mate.

Truly a wonderful player for India but his on the wane. His eyes seem to be going as well.

If Pujara hasn't replaced him by then I'll cry!!!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 19, 2010, 08:44:22 AM
Good call - he will get picked ahead of Youvraj.

I think Raina is going to be a good player too...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 19, 2010, 08:55:16 AM
Good call - he will get picked ahead of Youvraj.

I think Raina is going to be a good player too...

I had my doubts about Raina, issues with the bouncer, but he was excellent vs the Lankans. Raina also proved he's better than the selectors favourites Rohit(rubbish) and Kohli.

Yuvraj's Test career is over...for the time being. He lacks the temperament for Test's
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 19, 2010, 09:07:33 AM
In this day and age of indoor nets and bowling machines, why do players still have issues with the short ball?

This is a bit of a retorical question, but they clearly just don't work hard enough at it when they are developing. When I was at school (this isn't going to be a rant I promise!) we all used to line up in full kit and have tennis balls thrown at us so we would learn to duck and watch the ball, then bounced at us so we learned to get behind the ball, then we were given a going over with the bowling machine.
That was at an average cricket school 15 years ago... do people not get this kind of practice any more??
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Simmy on August 19, 2010, 09:15:42 AM
I assume you are referring to Alec James Stewart, England's finest?

When Stewart was in full flow, there were few who could live with him. Relying on touch, he was in his element against the quicks, cover-driving with a neat flourish and pulling with panache - most memorably when he thundered two centuries during England's storming of fortress Bridgetown in 1993-94.

([url]http://i895.photobucket.com/albums/ac151/buzzrockport/thegaffer2.jpg[/url])


spelling fail.. lol

yes mate he was my idol growing up and the main reason i am a weeket keeper tbh!!

grate player!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 19, 2010, 09:21:06 AM
spelling fail.. lol

grate player!

I thought he was great rather than grating, personally...;)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: procricket on August 19, 2010, 09:26:15 AM
jeet has deeraj jadhav got any chance of breaking into the test side or has he lost his way since the icl....
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Simmy on August 19, 2010, 09:27:05 AM
I thought he was great rather than grating, personally...;)

 >:( :( :D
lol
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: steelcouch on August 19, 2010, 09:40:47 AM
Looks like Matt Prior is still using a laminate
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 19, 2010, 09:54:01 AM
jeet has deeraj jadhav got any chance of breaking into the test side or has he lost his way since the icl....
Very doubtful Dave, he's getting on a bit and he plays for one of the less favoured sides.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 19, 2010, 09:55:21 AM
In this day and age of indoor nets and bowling machines, why do players still have issues with the short ball?

This is a bit of a retorical question, but they clearly just don't work hard enough at it when they are developing. When I was at school (this isn't going to be a rant I promise!) we all used to line up in full kit and have tennis balls thrown at us so we would learn to duck and watch the ball, then bounced at us so we learned to get behind the ball, then we were given a going over with the bowling machine.
That was at an average cricket school 15 years ago... do people not get this kind of practice any more??
I'd guess too much cricket, ODI's and T20 events all year round leaves less time to work to technical issues in domestic cricket.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: procricket on August 19, 2010, 10:04:59 AM
deehraj is without doubt a quality player i suspect gambhir took his slot at athe time top class player indeed
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 19, 2010, 10:08:43 AM
deehraj is without doubt a quality player i suspect gambhir took his slot at athe time top class player indeed
Normally if you play for Mumbai, Delhi, Punjab you get a lot more changes to play for the national side.

Never say never though Dave, Gambhir was set to quit cricket before India finally recalled him, so Deehraj may still have a chance.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Alvaro on August 19, 2010, 10:10:48 AM
I'd guess too much cricket, ODI's and T20 events all year round leaves less time to work to technical issues in domestic cricket.


http://www.cricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/473056.html
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 19, 2010, 10:11:38 AM
I'd guess too much cricket, ODI's and T20 events all year round leaves less time to work to technical issues in domestic cricket.
I think too much partying after matches (as they are required to do after the IPL) and not enough Robin Smith style net practices... (6am after a massive night out, with the bowling machine on 90mph on a table to get more bounce...)

Back on Topic. Finn is a class act and a real talent.
PAK are 2 down.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Tumo on August 19, 2010, 10:18:43 AM
Should have been 3! Morgan's dropped a fairly standard chance, went hard but still should have taken it...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on August 19, 2010, 10:38:43 AM
Swannny strikes again......prior with some excellent juggling skills at 50p a drop that one alone has cost him £2.50!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: procricket on August 19, 2010, 10:39:25 AM
great catch prior the deflection was big but he did well top drawer


hard catch that big deflection
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 19, 2010, 01:17:08 PM
it's funny what difference one very good batsman makes to a side. Yousuf has really added some steel to the batting and the rest don't seem to be as nervous.

shame Younis isn't playing.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 19, 2010, 01:19:00 PM
Younis was terrible for Surrey this year - I think the Pak's don't need him. MoYo is giving a demonstration of batting your way into form, buy gaining time at the crease without taking risks and letting the guys at the other end play their shots.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on August 19, 2010, 01:19:17 PM
Class always shines through
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 19, 2010, 01:25:59 PM
Younis was terrible for Surrey this year - I think the Pak's don't need him. MoYo is giving a demonstration of batting your way into form, buy gaining time at the crease without taking risks and letting the guys at the other end play their shots.

Younis is a excellent player, before this tour MoYo hadn't batted in nearly 6 months, Younis is in the same class.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on August 19, 2010, 01:27:08 PM
I can't agree with that mo is better than younis but just my opinion
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 19, 2010, 01:36:52 PM
not sure I said that MoYo was better than YoKa(!), but just implied that the Pak team don't need 2 old blokes (and said that YoKa was terrible this summer which is true.) - so one is fine and MoYo is doing well.
can any of you do a statsguru thing comparing them... I need to do some work and I would be interested to see the comprises.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 19, 2010, 01:45:44 PM
Buzz, Younis is 32, that's not old. MoYo is 36 in 8 days!

MoYo averages more but Younis is very good at 3.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 19, 2010, 01:54:55 PM
Jeet -I didn't realise Younis was 32, on that basis is in his absolute prime - as are all those born in the winter of 1977/78 (cough cough), I thought he was about 45 given how he pondered around the oval this Summer, but he has clearly modelled his fielding on my athletic attempts.

Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 19, 2010, 01:59:36 PM
MoYo goes!!

What does Umar have in the tank today...??

100 test wickets for Swann marvellous
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: eaowbear on August 19, 2010, 02:13:05 PM
And doesn't it show how ridiculous it was to omit Swann from the original Cricketer of The Year list? Strange that Clive Lloyd has said it was merely an 'oversight' when Duncan Fletcher was on the panel and by all accounts can't stand Swann from his first tour to South Africa?

Or am I looking for a conspiracy theory when it was a genuine mistake?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on August 19, 2010, 02:20:50 PM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/8928599.stm
Swanny is on the shortlist! Good news, hope he blo0dy wins it!

Yum Yum, i wonder how that Humblie Pie tastes Mr.Fletcher  >:(
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 19, 2010, 02:21:39 PM
And doesn't it show how ridiculous it was to omit Swann from the original Cricketer of The Year list? Strange that Clive lloyd has said it was merely an 'oversight' when Duncan Fletcher was on the panel and by all accounts can't stand Swann from his first tour to South Africa?
Gus (also on the panel) was berated roundly on this subject last night on the Tuffers cricket show on radio 5 last night by Michael Vaughan and Tuffers - poor Gus was very embarassed.
Fletcher has a massive chip on his shoulder about all things English cricket, especially as the team is now doing so well (generally).  Eaowbear - look away - it is there!! ???
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 19, 2010, 02:42:12 PM
[url]http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/8928599.stm[/url]
Swanny is on the shortlist! Good news, hope he blo0dy wins it!

Yum Yum, i wonder how that Humblie Pie tastes Mr.Fletcher  >:(

Dout he'll win it Dom, Sehwag for me
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on August 19, 2010, 02:49:53 PM
Buzz, Younus was actually born in 1975. He once in his interview said that he is 35 (or 34) as he was born in 1975, hence, his odi jersey says '75'.

In my opinion, Yousuf is more classy and better than Younus regardless what the stats says. Although it doesn't mean Younus is not a class player. Younus is as well but not better than Yousuf in my opinion. Yousuf is one of the few classiest player around the game of cricket. Many people were against Yousuf's comeback and were bashing him by saying he haven't touched cricket bat for 6 or so months but I don't think such thing has anything to do with a sheer class batsman who has potential to score at his will.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 19, 2010, 02:59:18 PM
Buzz, Younus was actually born in 1975. He once in his interview said that he is 35 (or 34) as he was born in 1975, hence, his odi jersey says '75'.

In my opinion, Yousuf is more classy and better than Younus regardless what the stats says. Although it doesn't mean Younus is not a class player. Younus is as well but not better than Yousuf in my opinion. Yousuf is one of the few classiest player around the game of cricket. Many people were against Yousuf's comeback and were bashing him by saying he haven't touched cricket bat for 6 or so months but I don't think such thing has anything to do with a sheer class batsman who has potential to score at his will.
Younis 35? Where did he say that?

Cricinfo lists him as 32 and that info is obtained from the national boards, PCB is Younis's case.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 19, 2010, 03:07:46 PM
http://khan.bigstarcricket.com/bs/players/khan/about.shtml
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: mars on August 19, 2010, 03:12:20 PM
Hmmm.... thats strange. But I would go with Pakistan Cricket Board site and cricinfo which both state him to be born on "November 29, 1977, Mardan, North-West Frontier Province"
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on August 19, 2010, 05:21:16 PM
It's quote common in Asia where you have decreased your age to make into national or pre national teams. For instance, Afridi ain't 32 (or whatever his profile says)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on August 19, 2010, 05:23:05 PM
This new lad Azhar Ali was quite impressive today. He impressed me! Got a bit unlucky that he wasn't able to get his madien century.

By the way, anyone closely saw his gloves? They are SS Milliniuem Pro but with Ihsan tags all over. And he got those gloves from Uzi Sports
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: procricket on August 19, 2010, 05:28:28 PM
did he???
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 19, 2010, 05:35:49 PM
It's quote common in Asia where you have decreased your age to make into national or pre national teams. For instance, Afridi ain't 32 (or whatever his profile says)
Never seen that happen in India.

Mind you Sachin is 37, but he could easily pass off as 25
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: mars on August 19, 2010, 05:54:36 PM
Bad day for the skipper Strauss today! Drop catch and then getting out again to Aamer.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: procricket on August 19, 2010, 06:02:16 PM
one or two pakistan pro do this...

there was one who was born day before me but was for some reason 5 years younger
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on August 19, 2010, 06:16:16 PM
Dave, yes he did!

Jeet, I am not sure about Sachin but new lads do it so they can make U19 side etc
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 20, 2010, 09:36:25 AM
any predictions for today's play?
I have my fingers crossed for Cook, but my head isn't confident for him, so may be left for Morgan and Collingwood to make runs for us so that we can really make a game of it... anything more than a lead of 175 and I'll put 50p on an England win. On that basis, we need to score more than 250.

Actually with the return of MoYo, make that 350.

Add to that for a bit of fun - lets have a sweep on how long Anderson (aka the white Lara) will last this morning (err I meant today), done on time. Closest can pat themselves on the back. Just to clarify we will go with the time of the fall of wicket on Cricinfo

I will start with 11:13
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: eaowbear on August 20, 2010, 09:47:00 AM
I will give him a couple of overs so reckon the new Lara will last until 11.07!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on August 20, 2010, 09:48:44 AM
i think he'll last til 11:24! I'm just going for it!!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Howzat on August 20, 2010, 09:49:18 AM
12:10
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on August 20, 2010, 09:52:13 AM
How about saturday 4:30 ;)?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 20, 2010, 09:54:40 AM
Pep's are you suggesting the White Lara will make 300... brilliant!! Leo - nice confidence. I assume you aren't near the rather cloudy oval today!!

PeteHosk - if you are out there today, how was your day at the oval, or do you have a slightly achy head from the nasty cheap lager...?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Tom on August 20, 2010, 09:55:37 AM
2nd over of the day - 11:09
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: AlRidd on August 20, 2010, 09:57:21 AM
11:17 I reckon.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: PM7 on August 20, 2010, 09:59:21 AM
Could he last longer than Cook?  ;)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Six Sixes Cricket on August 20, 2010, 09:59:45 AM
11:11
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 20, 2010, 10:00:29 AM
Could he last longer than Cook?  ;)
Almost certainly, Cook is on strike! :(
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: tommo256 on August 20, 2010, 10:10:01 AM
2nd over after lunch ;)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: eaowbear on August 20, 2010, 10:30:40 AM
Did I just hear right on TMS that Anderson, sorry the new Lara, has played the shot of the match through extra off Asif for 4???? And I said 11.07, what a fool! Keep the faith...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 20, 2010, 10:39:14 AM
then Anderson unleashes an immaculate cover-driven four, as if he momentarily thinks he's David Gower. A single takes him to 12, while Cook dabs a single to fine leg to reduce the deficit to 40.

The BBC, really just haven't got it. Anderson is the White Lara.

Anderson is out 11.39

I make Pep's the winner...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on August 20, 2010, 10:42:02 AM
Woohoo pat on the back for me!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 20, 2010, 11:32:17 AM
Cooking with gas. That's his best shot yet, striding out to meet Amir's latest delivery and cream a cover drive away for four. Gower purrs appreciatively, and Holding points out that Cook doesn't bother walking down the wicket to punch gloves or any such nonsense, but simply turns and takes his place in the crease. "He is in his own zone," says Holding.

I like the old punching gloves nonsense - plus it originated in the Windies... But who am I to ague with the very great and most reviered "The Bowling's" Holding...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Tumo on August 20, 2010, 11:35:17 AM
Shot of the day that was. Glorious cover drive. When Cook is driving the ball well you know he's found some confidence. Deserved his 50, worked really hard this innings for it.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: eaowbear on August 20, 2010, 11:42:07 AM
Sounds similar to the 'last chance saloon' Strauss/Collingwood knocks when their places were under the upmost scrutiny so hats off to Cook
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on August 20, 2010, 11:51:42 AM
Hopefully he can kick on like they did after the last chance saloon
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on August 20, 2010, 01:28:14 PM
Ton up! Can he make it to 150??!!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 20, 2010, 01:29:02 PM
Nice shot to reach his ton!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: tommo256 on August 20, 2010, 01:31:23 PM
Form is temporary, class is permanent comes to mind.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: mars on August 20, 2010, 02:01:24 PM
Top innings from Alistair Cook, well done!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 20, 2010, 03:52:26 PM
Eng floating up the creak at the moment... 8 down.
Well bowled to the chucker
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on August 20, 2010, 04:10:32 PM
Chucker strikes again!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on August 20, 2010, 07:12:37 PM
Err why is he being calle a "chucker"? Mind you ICC have cleared him and his elbow bends below 15 Degrees
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: PM7 on August 20, 2010, 07:14:58 PM
Fairplay to Pakistan, after all the crap they have been through Id love to seem them nick it tommorow.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: ianbuchanan on August 20, 2010, 07:18:19 PM
pakistan played well, but my money is still on england!!!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 26, 2010, 09:48:42 AM
Start delayed due to rain this morning - but here goes the final installment of the test series for this summer. Both teams will be unchanged from the Oval. If you are going, I hope you packed a thermos of tea and your waterproofs!

"The umpires are monitoring the light, and the outfield is still wet," confirms an ECB spokesperson.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on August 26, 2010, 09:52:52 AM
They said on sky that the outfield is dry just a little drizzle around
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: mdl_1979 on August 26, 2010, 10:06:44 AM
I think even if the rain stops they'll struggle to get on this morning.  It's pretty dark everywhere.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Colesy on August 26, 2010, 12:52:17 PM
That drop was worse than my TWO Saturday
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on August 26, 2010, 01:29:31 PM
They said on sky that the outfield is dry just a little drizzle around
I don't think wet outfield would be an issue ever because Lords drainage system is just THE best in the world
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 26, 2010, 01:30:30 PM
Didn't say that they forked out £1.3M for that drainage system?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on August 26, 2010, 01:33:30 PM
Yes alot of money buy prob worth it in long run as more cricket can be played
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 26, 2010, 01:38:28 PM
Yes - they did say £1.2M for the drainage and £2.4M for the lights!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: 400notout on August 26, 2010, 01:47:03 PM
2.4 mil on lights and they don't even use them :@ Just think it's very silly going off in conditions like that, full crowd in etc and only seeing half a days play maximum! Older way i.e discussing with the batsmen seems to be the better option, as it means we get more play generally. Trott is seeing it like a beach ball, if given the option would he have walked off...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Liam-SCCC on August 26, 2010, 01:53:19 PM
The problem is they are using the lights causing shadows! As bumble said, the sun causes shadows!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on August 26, 2010, 02:02:28 PM
tbh batsmen always seem to walk off! unless they are chasing a target!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on August 26, 2010, 02:04:34 PM
Nothing to do with them any more purely the umpires now which was suppose to keep teams out
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: PM7 on August 26, 2010, 02:05:02 PM
Absolute shambles, this could only happen in England and at Lords as well!
A few years ago I forked out a small fortune on flights, hotels and tickets to watch India vs England at Lords and spent hours waiting for the team to continue playing.There were too many stoppages and then the obligatory 30 min wait for a restart.I was amazed how many people left the ground  having shelled out £75 for 2 full hours play in the day.There was total disregard for the spectators and  players and they were more interested in the Rules of Play.
Its completely laughable how the paying public get screwed all the time in England and nothing gets done about it.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: wannabecrickter2k10 on August 26, 2010, 02:15:33 PM
anyone think alister cook will get on todat
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on August 26, 2010, 03:01:16 PM
Cheers guys!

I am not in England nor I have seen any match but do they refund if it rains throughout the day or half of the day?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on August 27, 2010, 10:02:46 AM
Cooks gone, third ball of the day - what's peoples predictions for the rest of todays play then???
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 27, 2010, 10:05:53 AM
England all out for 230
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: pumakid on August 27, 2010, 10:08:31 AM
pietersen must be dropped!!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 27, 2010, 10:10:19 AM
pietersen must be dropped!!!

as much as i dont like comments like this, im starting to think it might be for the best.

if only the pakistanis would drop him in the slips!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 27, 2010, 10:11:30 AM
Colly now in. Im watching online at work, so i have no sound. How many times have Sky called him "Brigadier Block" already?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 27, 2010, 10:12:37 AM
pietersen must be dropped!!!
That is a horrific idea, on that basis do you think Strauss should get dropped too, his series average is worse than KP's? Anyone can get out first ball, espcially in these condictions.

I am not sure Eng will make 150, 220 is a good score today... sunny this weekend so we could be in real trouble.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 27, 2010, 10:15:02 AM
Colly now gone! Maybe Ponting had a point about batting collapses
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Johnny on August 27, 2010, 10:17:37 AM
Oh Crap
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on August 27, 2010, 10:18:41 AM
Trott looking good out there
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 27, 2010, 10:19:58 AM
That is a horrific idea, on that basis do you think Strauss should get dropped too, his series average is worse than KP's? Anyone can get out first ball, espcially in these condictions.

I am not sure Eng will make 150, 220 is a good score today... sunny this weekend so we could be in real trouble.

Good point. Strauss, Cook (bar his ton in the last game), Colly and KP are all in the same boat. I find it hard to distinguish one from the other batting average/performance wise this series. I bet Ian Bell is loving this

Big knock for Morgan, no time like the present to prove you can dig in and play a test match innings
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on August 27, 2010, 10:22:49 AM
ohh no
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on August 27, 2010, 10:23:05 AM
Deep poo now
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on August 27, 2010, 10:23:37 AM
knee deep!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 27, 2010, 10:24:01 AM
I'll take the blame for that, think i cursed the lad!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Johnny on August 27, 2010, 10:24:23 AM
From reading the BBC text commentary, it sounds like some pretty special bowling going on - though Pieterson sonds like he was trying to be a bit to aggressive first ball - Cook and Colly sound like they've been done by good'uns
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 27, 2010, 10:26:03 AM
KP played at a wide one across his body, didnt seem to do a great deal.

Colly and Cook both had good balls to be fair
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 27, 2010, 10:26:46 AM
I think I may lock this topic so we can have no more "commentators cursing"

saying things like "Prior has been our best batsman this summer" is totally banned

oh.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Johnny on August 27, 2010, 10:27:49 AM
Does anyone watch 'How I met your mother' on E4?

"There's no such thing as a jinx"
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Johnny on August 27, 2010, 10:29:00 AM
Ben Dirs describes Morgan's dismissal as "an absolute huckleberry of a delivery"
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on August 27, 2010, 10:32:52 AM
Prior was almost gone as well. I think it was out. But you have appreciate the lads honesty
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 27, 2010, 10:33:45 AM
I would like for us to be out for 60 or so and quickly.
Then get Pakistan in, as I want to see if it's the conditions that are making such a difference?

That way, if Pakistan are bowled out cheaply too, then we will at least know that the conditions are doing alot of the damage! But if Pakistan bat well through the conditions, then (as expected) it will be cos Engalnd are batting like a bunch of &#%$s!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on August 27, 2010, 10:34:05 AM
I think Morgans delievery was a good as well. Was quite identical to Cooks
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on August 27, 2010, 10:35:21 AM
Wow what a jaffer by Asif. Prior had no clue
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 27, 2010, 01:07:49 PM
Swann must be dropped, his batting is horrendous ;)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: eaowbear on August 27, 2010, 03:49:28 PM
What a fantastic knock by Trott. After the South Africa series I must admit I wasn't convinced but without him this summer we would have been in a whole heap of trouble more often than not. Hats off!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 27, 2010, 03:52:16 PM
He has batted really well, and scored at a good rate. Broad has supported him well too
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: will5210 on August 27, 2010, 04:06:43 PM
I really hope Broad gets his ton! He's deserved it
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on August 27, 2010, 04:39:04 PM
yeh would be good to see him reach the triple figures....his batting has improved to reflect him reaching his top test score now
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: essexarsenal on August 27, 2010, 04:39:59 PM
i bet broad gets out on 96 or 97
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: maxy1 on August 27, 2010, 04:54:10 PM
im thinking 104 for him then out
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on August 27, 2010, 04:57:30 PM
come on boys get behind your fellow countrymen!!!! 136 ;)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: tommy2tink on August 27, 2010, 04:58:50 PM
Good on Broad to get there...though why Riaz came on to bowl, I just don't know.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 27, 2010, 05:03:45 PM
Me neither...and the Pakistan bowling is pretty high standard, sometimes brilliant. Their batting a bit hit and miss, but sometimes very good. But their fielding........... :(
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Alvaro on August 27, 2010, 07:43:04 PM
Good on Broad to get there...though why Riaz came on to bowl, I just don't know.

amir was tired after 6 tests in 8 weeks?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: mars on August 27, 2010, 09:44:19 PM
At Lord's today. What an innings by Trott and Broad. Did anyone notice the standing ovation Broad got once he got his 1st ton? Never heard anything as loud and long!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: tommo256 on August 27, 2010, 09:58:39 PM
Good knock by the boys, Glad to be mates with broadys cousins ;)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on August 27, 2010, 10:03:40 PM
Great that different people are getting runs at different times eg Morgans ton kp 80 cook Ton and this game but would be great if two or three could combine more often but at least broady's dad can't hold it over him that at least he has scored a test hundred for England any more lol
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Alvaro on August 28, 2010, 10:28:29 AM
blowers has just referred to a pak player as 'umar actimel' - the old goat really seems to be losing grasp of what's going on...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 28, 2010, 12:04:43 PM
Blowers is a legent though!
And when he strays off and loses his grip, it's even funnier!  :D
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 28, 2010, 01:26:44 PM
Broad and Anderson have both struck early 9 for 2!
But now Pakistan have their two best batsmen in.....Butt and MoYo!
Talking about putting the pressure on the captain and the veteran! But am seriously impressed with MoYo!
And still think that Younis Khan also being shipped in to strengthen the batting would have been a decent shout!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 28, 2010, 01:29:40 PM
Crumbs - Broad is absolutely on fire!!
Not only hitting 169 with the bat, but now getting the very classy dangerman MoYo for a duck!
Jeez - will be interesting to see if they manage to make a stand without him!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 28, 2010, 03:39:35 PM
Swanny and Finn are chipping in too!
This is looking very familiar, but with England an upper order batsman stayed in to steady the ship.
The question is, will Pakistan find a couple of batsmen to help avoid the follow on?  ???
Crumbs....with yesterday and today, who said that Test cricket's not as entertaining these days!!??
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: mars on August 28, 2010, 03:44:36 PM
Yes, it was a great display of how entertaining Test Cricket can be!

As for Pakistan, can't see them avoiding the follow-on, no chance!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 28, 2010, 03:53:51 PM
I'm with you there!
If they do avoid the follow on, then good on 'em!
It'll be a tough task but Broad showed that you can bat if you stay patient and get in first! Mind you,m Broad was dropped and rode his luck on a few occasions!  :o

The batsmen seem to be having problems watching the ball out of Finn's hand! May have something to do with him being extra tall!? At this rate, they'll need to start having taller side screens!!

I was in the middle of typing the fact that Akmal has a great opportunity to dig them out of the doodoo, when half way through the sentence, he goes and gets out!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: RoCo Da Pixie on August 28, 2010, 03:59:58 PM
Pakistan all out now, Follow on Enforced, They are a shocking team at the moment when it does not go their way.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 28, 2010, 04:05:54 PM
They just seem really unstable!
Shame cos I still think they need 3 things to make them a classy side.....

1. Younis Khan is to strengthen the batting with experience! One classy veteran is not enough. This seems to give confidence to the rest of the younger batsmen!

2. Catch practice!! And lots of it!

3. Fielding practice!!

On the plus side, their bowling is looking excellent! In particular Asif looks great considering he only bowls at 80mph (80 being pretty slow at this level - but just shows how effectively he bowls!) and what an awesome prospect Amir is at only 18!!! He looks the real deal for sure!  8)
The other bowlers are decent enough too, although not in the same class as Amir and Asif.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: RoCo Da Pixie on August 28, 2010, 04:13:19 PM
I agree their bowlers are very good, Ajmal you must wonder how it has only taken him unto the age of 31 to starting to get regular cricket for pakistan, He looks very good,

The Batting line up needs to be supported, Yousuf and Khan are needed, Azhar Ali looks good, But Farhat and Hameed look weak
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 28, 2010, 04:34:29 PM
You have to question Hameed's mental attitude when he comes down the track at Broad when they are following on!  ???
I did think Umar looked a good young batting prospect against the Aussies. But he has been a little too aggresive against the England bowling attack! If he were taken under MoYo's wing and taught when to play aggresive shots and when not to, then he may turn out to be a class player!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 28, 2010, 04:55:10 PM
And how is it that it's always the tail enders who have these bats I've never heard of!

(http://i551.photobucket.com/albums/ii471/petehosk/IMG_0746.jpg)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: essexarsenal on August 28, 2010, 07:18:21 PM
I agree their bowlers are very good, Ajmal you must wonder how it has only taken him unto the age of 31 to starting to get regular cricket for pakistan, He looks very good,



Suppose because danish kaneria has been playing instead of him?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on August 28, 2010, 07:22:04 PM
You have to question Hameed's mental attitude when he comes down the track at Broad when they are following on!  ???
I did think Umar looked a good young batting prospect against the Aussies. But he has been a little too aggresive against the England bowling attack! If he were taken under MoYo's wing and taught when to play aggresive shots and when not to, then he may turn out to be a class player!
Actually Umar is a good young prospect but I believe there are few off field activities which are pulling him down.

When Umar made his debut under MoYo's captaincy against NZ and Australia he was by far one of the best batsman at that time and wa one of the one on who the team was dependent. As you said it did help him in that series as most of the time he was at the crease with MoYo
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on August 28, 2010, 07:26:47 PM
Ajmal and Saqlain both are of same ages. Saqlain is/was better than Ajmal, hence, he didn't get chance. Later Kaneria was best spinner for Pakistan so it was quite difficult to fit him in the playing XI.

Another thing I must say is that both Asif and Amir néed immediate rest as they have played 6 consective test matches and have bowled 20-30 overs in each inning. The injury could be career treathing as well. Pakistan had overbowled with Mohammad Zahid (Who Shoaib Akhtar himself admitted is "yards quicker than me"). So let's hope Amir gets some rest over the next few weeks. Asif will most likely as Gul or Razzaq will replace him for ODIs plus he won't be playing against Saffers in Oct/Nov
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: essexarsenal on August 28, 2010, 07:42:06 PM
Its a shame as pakistan COULD be a great team. If only they good sort out the problems.
-salman butt isnt a great captain and will take a long time to learn
-catching and fielding is absolute awful!
-of course off field troubles with not playing in pakistan, y.khan etc
- small problems like umar gul and his no balls
- young players like a.ali and umar akmal struggling although ali batted well last test but I suppose its good experiene for them but its not helping the team in the current situation.
- hameed only in the team for his slip catching which is a real shame as he cant bat!
Also on the umar akmal debate , when there is no pressure on him he is a wonderful player.When he goes out and just plays for e.g at essex he hit danish for three massive sixes and destroyed us. Also look out for Shahzaib Hasan, young man he can really bat!

Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Johnny on August 28, 2010, 08:10:34 PM
And how is it that it's always the tail enders who have these bats I've never heard of!

([url]http://i551.photobucket.com/albums/ii471/petehosk/IMG_0746.jpg[/url])


UK based company, mainly specialise in team wear - current sponsores of the Yorkshire ECB Premier League

https://www.solly-sports.com/client/index.php?path=content&id=5&lang=en

You can get a Solly Test Pro SMS Limited Edition for £150
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: RoCo Da Pixie on August 28, 2010, 09:10:33 PM
Pakistan suspected match fixing on no balls, currently on BBC news
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on August 28, 2010, 09:11:58 PM
Some were pretty big
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: procricket on August 28, 2010, 09:12:53 PM
solly sports do very nice palms on there gloves a few lads round yours johnny use them
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Tom on August 28, 2010, 09:12:59 PM
Yep, looks pretty conclusive. With Amir bowling those 2 huge no balls as predicted.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: RoCo Da Pixie on August 28, 2010, 09:13:25 PM
News of the world has a recorded video of a man detailing when the no balls will happen, then during play it happens amir with 2 asif with 1 as well
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Alvaro on August 28, 2010, 09:15:53 PM
quelle surprise...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Tom on August 28, 2010, 09:29:35 PM
http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/924349/Cricket-in-the-dock-as-we-expose-betting-scandal-England-Pakistan-Test.html
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on August 28, 2010, 09:39:35 PM
Good spot Tom if all true could ruin slot of careers me thinks
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: maxy1 on August 28, 2010, 09:50:54 PM
agreed - if that reports even 60 % true there would be serious problems 4 the pakistan team , wouldnt surprise me if it was all 100 % true , i feel for the pakistan fans tho whatever the cricket scandal is there team always seems to be rite in the middle  :(
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: tommo256 on August 28, 2010, 09:54:06 PM
It is sick, how they want to ruin the gentlemans sport just for there gain
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on August 28, 2010, 10:00:22 PM
If proved to be true got to be at least life time bans which could decimate the Pakistan side for a while but got to be proven in a court of law first
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: PM7 on August 28, 2010, 10:39:23 PM
How incredibly pathetic if the revelations are true.
I was quietly pleased that they won the last Test as it meant the world to the Pakistani fans after all the crap their country has been through recently. >:(
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: mars on August 28, 2010, 11:15:23 PM
It would be absolutely DISGRACEFUL is these allegations came out to be true. Looking at that News of the World article, looks pretty believable. Also if you look at Amir's first no-ball in the 3rd over from sideon, Salman Butt is looking in the direction of the wicket... is this a sign?

(http://i33.tinypic.com/24w546d.jpg)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Tom on August 28, 2010, 11:46:28 PM
More allegations:

The team were to throw 2 Pakistan vs England ODI's
http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/924628/Majeed-revealed-he-was-plotting-for-Pakistan-to-lose-TWO-of-the-One-Day-Internationals.html

Fixed Australia vs Pakistan Test Match (No huge suprise)
http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/924793/We-made-830k-when-Pakistan-collapsed-in-the-Aussie-match.html
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Tumo on August 29, 2010, 06:12:28 AM
Utterly disgraceful. I don't know how they can even consider doing it. NOTW isn't a favourite paper of mine by any stretch of the imagination, but damn they know how to expose people! First John Higgins, then Fergie (ex-wife of Prince Andrew), now this! It's once again a blot on the landscape for cricketers, nobody wants this in the game...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: turnitayard on August 29, 2010, 08:08:35 AM
its a disgrace and yet again pakistan are to blame,there fans are so passionate and deserve far more than this
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: procricket on August 29, 2010, 08:33:07 AM
makes you wonder how far the cookie crumbles it ok just blaming the Pakistan team i wonder how many in truth around the world have taken a bung or two.

infact sometimes i wonder if it only club cricket and pub football is the only true spirit left in the games....

were there is fast money there is greed were there greed there corruption
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: turnitayard on August 29, 2010, 08:38:52 AM
i have a feeling there is pressure put on some of the young pakistan players but its still no excuse,
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: procricket on August 29, 2010, 08:41:18 AM
Pressure they over pampared so called stars do not understand the word pressure.....at all
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: turnitayard on August 29, 2010, 08:52:06 AM
Your right buddy i would love that pressure playing international cricket
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: tommy2tink on August 29, 2010, 11:30:30 AM
On a slightly different note...did anyone notice the ear pads and screws in Saeed Ajmal's Masuri were coloured, and differently so on either side? Is this something that has been done specially for him only? Or is there somewhere you can buy the ear pads and screws in different colours?

Also, Umar Akmal suddenly seems to have come to life with his batting, now that there is no pressure on it...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 29, 2010, 11:49:56 AM
And another note...........did anyone else notice Beefy's eye? Very bloodshot indeed!
Looked as though he'd been on the booze all night! Maybe he decided to raid the minibar?
Or maybe he has just been working too many hours?  :-[
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: procricket on August 29, 2010, 12:43:50 PM
yes you can get the coloured pads and screws from australia


to be honest about corruption i suspect if you looked proffesional sports would resemble wrestling with many thing already sorted before the game has been played and that includes many sports football,rugby,cricket,,  any sport were there hugh sums of money to be made in fact
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 29, 2010, 01:51:53 PM
Pakistan should give all the guilty parties life bans. The only stuff like this can be removed from cricket. But seeing how weak the PCB is, that will never happen.

Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: tommo256 on August 29, 2010, 02:01:24 PM
It is a great shame for Broady, To havee to lose his name on honours and his record breaking stand with trott all because they want some money :(
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Watsontotty on August 29, 2010, 02:47:41 PM
I think the Pakistan players should receive a ban of 3-5 years as when they dish out life bans that is normally a month or so, not sure the icc will have the bottle to get involved but this need dealt with once and for all. This is something Pakistan need to remove from there team once and for all if they don't i certainly wont respect them or the team. I can see a big carpet at the ready though !!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: PM7 on August 29, 2010, 02:59:37 PM
I genuinely hope that there will be more revelations over the next few days and everything will be out in the open.For many years similar sitautions have been covered up by the Indian,Pakistan and Australia Cricket Boards amongst others.After the Hansie Cronje incident betting has actually reached a much bigger scale and there is much more money involved.Its such a shame for all the cricket fans around the world.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Tumo on August 29, 2010, 03:37:18 PM
It is a great shame for Broady, To havee to lose his name on honours and his record breaking stand with trott all because they want some money :(
Where's the proof for this? As far as I know, there is nothing to do with the outcome of the match involved in the spot-fixing, as spot-fixing is exactly that, betting on fixed "spots" or moments in the match, of no real significance...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 29, 2010, 08:27:02 PM
I think the news of the world have entrapped two or three very young, experienced cricketers, who know they have no money and no real way of making any, especially given the situations back in Pakistan and were nieve enough to think this was an easy way out.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 29, 2010, 08:32:03 PM
Not entirely surprised at this, but, like many i expect more to come out.

Anyone see Butt's press conference after the game? When pressed to state they were false, he struggled.

I'm still amazed that people bet on no-balls!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 29, 2010, 08:38:42 PM

I'm still amazed that people bet on no-balls!
If it's fixed, they know what going to happening, their never going to lose!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 29, 2010, 08:42:55 PM
good point, but if its not fixed it just seems mental to me.

i reckon KP was being paid to get out cheaply all summer, that must be the reason :)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 29, 2010, 09:38:05 PM
It is all pretty ugly, but salman butt was pretty aggressive in his denile. Plus we must not forget that sky is owned by the same group as the news of the world. The two big winners from this are... Sky and the news of the world.
I feel very sorry for the pakistani team.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Talisman on August 29, 2010, 09:40:56 PM
Surely none of this has come as a surprise, the bowling of a few no balls is the least of their problems, suspicion has long been held that they lose matches on demand for bribes. With such a huge turnover of players and comparative lack of money in the game coupled with a state run administrative system it will only be a matter of time before this all blew up.

"Greed is good" according to Gordon Gecko but it will always stain those who chase "easy" money and how long is a life ban in Pakistan???
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: maxy1 on August 29, 2010, 10:07:40 PM
good point, but if its not fixed it just seems mental to me.

i reckon KP was being paid to get out cheaply all summer, that must be the reason :)

haha i love that
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 30, 2010, 07:47:28 PM
Just to add to this - FYI according to the Times today - Afridi is a leading earner and he is only on £25K (average England Salery is £120K)

edit - FYI - Amir is a category B player in Pakistan, and his monthly retainer works out to £1,300

If these guys get offered say £50K it is not surprising they are tempted.

Once again it seriously begs the question as to what on earth are the Pak Administrators doing with their ICC handouts...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on August 30, 2010, 07:52:38 PM

Once again it seriously begs the question as to what on earth are the Pak Administrators doing with their ICC handouts...
Probably buying their retirement homes and setting up their pensions.

Everyone knows the PCB is the most corrupt board in the world.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Tom on August 30, 2010, 07:52:48 PM
Pakistani players are also very unattractive to sponsors because of past controversy. Pakistan captain you could become his kit supplier for 2% of the alleged money paid to the India captain by Reebok. An England bowler costs similar money to the Pakistan skipper.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 31, 2010, 09:14:22 AM
This picture is brilliant...

So boss, is there anything in the paper today?...
(http://i895.photobucket.com/albums/ac151/buzzrockport/farkkkk.jpg)

do you think he was looking at Chloe, 19 from Colchester?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Mr Cricket on August 31, 2010, 09:32:28 AM
maybe, i imagine that chloe has 'no balls' anyway
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: alexrickyponting on August 31, 2010, 10:29:30 AM
i bought that paper at reading and was quite disappointed that there was no female from anywhere to calm me down after reading the front page  >:( :D
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 31, 2010, 12:12:59 PM
Very interesting tweet from KP just now....

"Yep.. Done for rest of summer!! Man of the World Cup T20 and dropped from the T20 side too.. Its a (No Swearing Please) up!! Surrey have signed me for l ..."

Sounds like he's been dropped from the T20 squad, and has signed for surrey.... Wonder if its real

EDIT: its been removed now, damn twitter!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 31, 2010, 12:16:08 PM
KP needs time in the middle and it is good news for Surrey, I think - this isn't a surprise
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 31, 2010, 12:19:23 PM
Having put that on twitter with the foul language, im sure this wont do him any favours. The young U-19 spinner got done for exactly the same thing!

Might see what odds the bookies offer of KP not going to AUS!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 31, 2010, 12:20:25 PM
If he isnt selected for England then he can go play in the Champions League i would have thought?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: alexrickyponting on August 31, 2010, 12:22:42 PM
NOOOOO! if surrey have actually signed him im gonna cry (No Swearing Please) chris (No Swearing Please) adams!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 31, 2010, 12:23:36 PM
Might just be until the end of the season. But if he does go and play in the CL, he'd play 1 game for them? Hardly seems worth it
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 31, 2010, 12:28:13 PM
Tweet that was removed - http://twitpic.com/2jxr0o (http://twitpic.com/2jxr0o)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: alexrickyponting on August 31, 2010, 12:29:34 PM
damn it, the bit thats cut off is the bit im most interested in >:(
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Tom on August 31, 2010, 12:29:52 PM
He has signed for Surrey, no-one wants him for next year though!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 31, 2010, 12:32:12 PM
Is this the beginning of the end for KP? He's talked about the damage to his moral and mental state recently, add this into an already frosty relationship with the ECB, might he just walk away from playing for England?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 31, 2010, 12:33:46 PM
Is this the beginning of the end for KP? He's talked about the damage to his moral and mental state recently, add this into an already frosty relationship with the ECB, might he just walk away from playing for England?

No he needs to win the Ashes in Australia at least once before he can quit. He will realise he needs the rest and needs the time at the crease and will be a better player for it, he is going to be really hungry when he returns.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 31, 2010, 12:37:08 PM
True, plus there is a the World Cup next year i'd imagine he'd like on his CV.

Will be interesting to see how the ECB react to this though
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: eaowbear on August 31, 2010, 12:41:47 PM
As you say, the foul mouthed rant from the U19 spinner was dealt with promptly (wasn't he banned for a month?) so let's see what the ECB do about this...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 31, 2010, 01:14:53 PM
this rather kills the spot betting issue... lots of words and hubris, no evidence... http://www.cricinfo.com/england-v-pakistan-2010/content/current/story/475246.html
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: mars on August 31, 2010, 01:47:20 PM
Cannot believe he has been dropped! Sure, he not in the greatest form, but KP is our best limited overs batsman over the years.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 31, 2010, 04:24:54 PM
Squads announced - http://www.ecb.co.uk/news/england/natwest-series/england,311832,EN.html (http://www.ecb.co.uk/news/england/natwest-series/england,311832,EN.html)

Nice to see Davies getting a chance, although i find the Kieswetter sidelining a bit odd. Good old England, doing their best to ruin another young mans confidence
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 31, 2010, 04:40:52 PM
Twenty20 Squad first......

(http://i551.photobucket.com/albums/ii471/petehosk/T20.jpg)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 31, 2010, 04:41:57 PM
They did say that Kieswetter should make the team in his own right as a batsman!?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 31, 2010, 04:42:45 PM
And the ODI squad.....

(http://i551.photobucket.com/albums/ii471/petehosk/ODI.jpg)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on August 31, 2010, 04:45:44 PM
no suprises in there as suggested on Sky by nick knight etc that there maybe a few new additions to the squad....seems were sticking with the tried and tested method and no wild-cards have been entered as such!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Talisman on August 31, 2010, 04:51:21 PM
I don't understand 2 keepers at all for the T20, nor dropping Kieswetter for the ODI, plus it looks light on batting, I think the late season matches tend to favour the bowlers and surely a stronger batting line up will be required.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 31, 2010, 04:57:25 PM
The ODI squad looks as if it should be strong enough in the batting....but the T20 does look light!?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on August 31, 2010, 04:58:42 PM
are they now classifying Broady as a genuine all-rounder??
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on August 31, 2010, 05:30:27 PM
Very light on batting and no Prior. comedy.
Davies has had a good year, but not as good as Prior, I ahve no idea why Kieswetter is picked as a specialist batter.

madness.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: thebd11 on August 31, 2010, 05:44:18 PM
personally, i dont like the tendency to go with its and bits all rounders, such as bresnan and broad, also i think that jos buttler is a better pure batting option than kieswetter, yes kieswetter is a better keeper, but hes not been chosen as a keeper so i think that buttler is a much better option
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on August 31, 2010, 06:10:28 PM
I can understand them changing keeper and giving Davies a try as he's on superb form.
But I tend to agree with the opinion here, that if you're playing Davies, then why play Kieswetter as well?
I would give Adams from Hampshire a go....I am biased as it's my place of birth....but the guy is on awesome form!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Watsontotty on August 31, 2010, 06:13:33 PM
Pete, how he has been given a chance is a joke the lad looks a cracking player in great form but as always he may get a chance when he is struggling or a few of the current players ain't scoring he will get chucked in at the deep end for the odd game here or there.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 31, 2010, 06:21:00 PM
I agree with the prior comment. If you arent picking kieswetter to keep then for me Prior gets in as a keeper/batsmen. I would say this makes Davies almost odds on to go to Aus as Priors understudy.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Talisman on August 31, 2010, 07:09:52 PM
The trouble with T20 is it is so hit and miss, and therefore the player selection can be as well. It only takes one player to have a great spell with the bat or ball to win the match, maybe with Lumb injured and KP rested they are looking to shore up the squad with an eye on the ODI World Cup.

I hate seeing players lauded and then dumped in a short space of time and since we are talking 7 months since he qualified for England would it not make sense to give Kieswetter a longer run in the ODI format.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: PM7 on August 31, 2010, 07:32:59 PM
Always amazes me why the English selectors are so bold and brave in recent times?.Kieswetter is totally hit and miss, just qualified for England,had a few good scores yet is now selected purely as a batsman. Morgan played a few good knocks and is now a fully fledged Test match batsman?
I can see him being just 3 innings away from being dropped.

Maybe the new England is simply blessed with an abundance of talent which is a good problem to have.Caps are given away too easily these days, I prefer the old fashioned approach of proving yourself in county cricket over a few years and earning your place through hard graft and consistent scores.

Think of the quality of the Aussies that cant get into the team and yet give it 110% in their domestic league which is way ahead of county cricket in terms of competitiveness.Having said that England will win the Ashes all day long :)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on August 31, 2010, 07:34:26 PM
I hate seeing players lauded and then dumped in a short space of time and since we are talking 7 months since he qualified for England would it not make sense to give Kieswetter a longer run in the ODI format.

Completely agree, thought the ECB had moved on from this kind of selection policy
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on September 02, 2010, 09:06:14 AM
From Ian O'Brien... in response to the Pak match fixing enquiry...

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=200514767672&ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT#ht_607wt_1139
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 02, 2010, 08:28:55 PM
The three players have been officially charged by the icc under the anti corruption law although they are saying will be investigated further but have now charged them so should be fun to see the pcb's response to this
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on September 02, 2010, 08:56:04 PM
The three players have been officially charged by the icc under the anti corruption law although they are saying will be investigated further but have now charged them so should be fun to see the pcb's response to this
Life bans must be dished out.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on September 02, 2010, 08:57:16 PM
and they MUST be actual life bans, none of this life = a month bans!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 02, 2010, 08:58:46 PM
That was pcb back tracking with bans I doubt icc will back track if found guilty
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on September 02, 2010, 09:00:17 PM
yeah good, the pcb is a joke! Wonder what will happen to the guy in the video? majeed is it?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on September 02, 2010, 09:01:23 PM
We don't know they are guilty yet - The News of the World has a history of setting people up (just ask a certain former England Rugby Captain...)

Plus life bans are far to harsh given the offence - I believe that this is on a par with drug cheeting, therefore a 2 year ban should be the maximum
 
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 02, 2010, 09:02:46 PM
Not much I think as the charge against him was defrauding book makers but the book makers are not in uk so could get complicated
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on September 02, 2010, 09:11:08 PM
gambling is illegal in pakistan anyway isnt it??
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on September 02, 2010, 09:17:11 PM
Yes - but that is because it is against Muslim law - just like gambling is banned in the middle east and in parts of India.

But since when has that stopped people.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on September 02, 2010, 09:19:01 PM
No i just meant what will he be convicted for, as book makers dont exist over there? or will he be charged for something by our country?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on September 02, 2010, 09:24:17 PM
Yes - but that is because it is against Muslim law - just like gambling is banned in the middle east and in parts of India.

But since when has that stopped people.
Sports betting is banned in India, nothing to do with Muslim Law, India's a Hindu country.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on September 02, 2010, 10:11:29 PM
what about pakistan? :S
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on September 02, 2010, 10:13:36 PM
what about pakistan? :S
all forms of gambling is banned in pakistan
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on September 06, 2010, 02:48:34 PM
Was watching the T20 match and most of the top order have the Boomboom bats.
But noticed that there is still the normal tell-tale of the sticky plaster hiding the true make of the bat possibly?
Would this of been a CA bat?  ???
Or am I doing them a injustice?

(http://i551.photobucket.com/albums/ii471/petehosk/BoomBoom01.jpg)

AND THE TELL-TALE PLASTER!
(http://i551.photobucket.com/albums/ii471/petehosk/BoomBoom02.jpg)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on September 06, 2010, 02:50:09 PM
I would think so mate...seems to be a fair few previous sticker marks on the bat from other stickers which have since been removed!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on September 07, 2010, 05:28:44 PM
Crumbs...Pakistan need to concentrate if they're gonna recover from this start!!!!
22 for 4 after 5 overs, and Alfridi been and gone too!  :(
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: robperry93 on September 07, 2010, 05:31:43 PM
They'll be fine, they've got fawad alam to come! ;)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Coach on September 07, 2010, 05:32:21 PM
Pete, is it not more likely to be a SS the CA stamp is smaller and square where as TON is a little more rectangular? Despite this why doesn't he just get it sanded off?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: robperry93 on September 07, 2010, 05:36:19 PM
Pete, is it not more likely to be a SS the CA stamp is smaller and square where as TON is a little more rectangular? Despite this why doesn't he just get it sanded off?
I think it is a CA because he looks like he used to be sponsored by them, his helmet still has the CA sticker on the back
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on September 07, 2010, 05:36:46 PM
Greg - Not sure why he doesn't get it sanded off. And if it were an SS, then it is either TON or SS on the side. Plus there is a TON across the bottom rear of the bat, and there was nothing covered up there.....so I though it may be a CA?

Rob - in all seriousness, I think that Umar Akmal is a danger and looks an awesome prospect! IF he stays in then they should get a decent score! He just needs to keep his head! 
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Wills on September 07, 2010, 05:41:49 PM
i agree with pete ;) (brownie points)

but i think that most pakistan players would use a pakistani bat make, i.e. ca, malik, ihsan etc.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: robperry93 on September 07, 2010, 05:58:00 PM
Rob - in all seriousness, I think that Umar Akmal is a danger and looks an awesome prospect! IF he stays in then they should get a decent score! He just needs to keep his head!
He didn't keep his head, and now they've lost fawad!!! :o
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on September 07, 2010, 05:59:11 PM
Shambles....if I was a paying member of the already small crowd I wouldn't feel as though my hard earned cash was getting me value for money from my ticket!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on September 07, 2010, 06:21:28 PM
Pakistan are better than this - granted that the English bowling attack is pretty decent these days!!
But the Pakistan batting is all over the place!  :(
They need to sort themselves out quickly, otherwise they will continue to fall apart!
It's quite sad when you look at their batting card, and know that they do have some very decent quality batsmen who are clueless at the moment! And the worst thing is that they all seem to be clueless at the same time!
They do have a lot on their minds but they need to concentrate on cricket when they go out to bat or their fans will desert them in droves!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on September 10, 2010, 08:59:56 AM
OK - the latest installment of the contests between Eng and Pak starts today.

This time a 10:15 start for an ODI at the Riverside stadium in Durham.

What sort of an idiot schedules a 5 match one day series in September with games starting at 10:15am - what it effectively means is that whoever wins the toss will bowl first and probably win the match - Actually to make it a better contest, maybe Eng should be made to bat first in the first 3 matches...

The start will be delayed this morning due to a wet outfield.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Colesy on September 10, 2010, 11:53:59 AM
Strauss' six was a friggin' awesome shot!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on September 10, 2010, 01:02:22 PM
Steven Davies is awesome!

Must be because he play's for Surrey!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on September 10, 2010, 01:07:36 PM
Jeet - what a curse!!!
WICKET! Davies 87 c K Akmal b Ajmal (England 152-2)

ggrrrr - but he is a decent player!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Colesy on September 10, 2010, 01:52:40 PM
What bat is Bopara using? Didn't think GM put red toe guards on their bats
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: 400notout on September 10, 2010, 02:14:34 PM
Take a bow Umar! Bullet Arm!

Actually, how good is Akmals keeping when he trys?!...
Seems pretty handy anyway, comparing
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Colesy on September 10, 2010, 02:19:26 PM
Lol dropped catch
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: 400notout on September 10, 2010, 02:21:35 PM
Yeah spoke too soon! Went sharpish! Ravi with some big hitting at the end, 274 looks waaay out of reach of a fragile looking Pakistan at the moment. I'll back them to make 170 odd all out
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Colesy on September 10, 2010, 02:26:22 PM
I'm going 123 all out
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on September 10, 2010, 02:26:43 PM
400 - I am not sure they will make that many.

I am going for 92

Bresnan will run through them.
Not sure why I think it will be the burly yorkie, but I suspect it will nip around a bit...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: pedaloboy on September 10, 2010, 03:02:53 PM
Irfan pictured is rumoured to be 6ft 10, although Wiki says he is 6ft 7. I am willing to put money on the fact he's actually taller.... :D
(http://i613.photobucket.com/albums/tt211/henrymagic14/_49054955_irfan.jpg)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: golders on September 10, 2010, 03:12:39 PM

I imagine that photo was taken before he went round the park and suffered from 'severe cramp'!he's huuuuge!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on September 10, 2010, 03:32:15 PM
Pak openers are doing really well - game on at the Riverside...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Buzz on September 10, 2010, 03:33:27 PM
what a curse!! was that mean?? ???

The terrible PAK stash is being slated on the radio - big innings for Mo-Yo
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 10, 2010, 03:37:52 PM
Swann is the man so glad he has come on the way he has as shown you have not got to have a doosra or be a mystery spinner to get wickets just good and intelligent attacking bowling
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on September 10, 2010, 03:51:52 PM
Did anyone see that ESPN is free viewing until Monday?
So sports viewing weekend for anyone interested!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Tumo on September 10, 2010, 03:55:09 PM
Fawad Alam's been playing just down the road from me at Woodhall Spa in the Lincs ECB, 7 innings, 456 runs at 76 with 1 ton and 5 50s, 25 wickets at 11, economy of 2.8, 3 5fers and an S/R of 24! He's been running riot, can't say the practice paid off in the t20s, hope it does for him here!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on September 10, 2010, 10:24:05 PM
Was good to see Pakistan put up a better fight today!

Did anyone notice that Strauss was using the new Grey Nicolls today?
I am sure it was mentioned in another topic somewhere, but maybe he uses the pink stickered bat for ODIs?

(http://i551.photobucket.com/albums/ii471/petehosk/StraussBat.jpg)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: golders on September 10, 2010, 10:29:07 PM
pete next time, can u get the frame of the telly in like they do on youtube? ;)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on September 16, 2010, 12:15:14 PM
Will try golders!  ;)

So with Pakistan starting to look like a better unit and pushing England in the last ODI, does anyone have any predictions for tomorrows 3rd ODI?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: tim2000s on September 16, 2010, 12:21:59 PM
My prediction is that I will be there watching it...  :D
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 16, 2010, 12:22:26 PM
England win by 30 runs or 4 wickets depends what we do first
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Howzat on September 16, 2010, 12:22:59 PM
Gutted someone offered me tickets but I cant make it :(
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on September 17, 2010, 12:46:25 PM
Pakistan won the toss AGAIN!!! They must a lucky coin!  ;)
Akmal was REALLY unlucky!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Canners on September 17, 2010, 12:48:13 PM
best get skyplayer on at work :)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Colesy on September 17, 2010, 01:43:46 PM
Looked at Asad Shafiq's bat and it looked like there was a line running down the edge like a laminate. Not accusing him of anything but......
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Colesy on September 17, 2010, 02:39:14 PM
Lol Afridi's gone!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on September 17, 2010, 02:43:10 PM
I tell you what, with Akmal's thigh pad onto the stumps, and now this dismissal where it comes off Afridi's bat for the run out, Pakistan are not having a lot of luck!!
Two very unlucky dismissals which you wouldn't normally see!  :(

But it's never over until both teams have batted I guess!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Colesy on September 17, 2010, 02:43:37 PM
Akmal was unlucky, Afridi was lazy
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: mattw on September 17, 2010, 02:46:41 PM
What a stupid run out on Afridi's account, just get yourself in and then worry about everything else...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on September 17, 2010, 02:48:42 PM
He was a bit! So he only has himself to blame!
Would be nice if we could have the luxury of winning the ODI series this early.......

It's supposed to be a decent wicket so hopefully we'll chase it down comfortably!  ???
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: mattw on September 17, 2010, 02:51:02 PM
Look at his second run, he basically strolls it - absolutely diabolical for an international cricketer.

Looking forward to the run chase though with Strauss and Davies opening.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on September 17, 2010, 02:54:17 PM
England do bat very deep these days! Swanny at 10? He's a very good ODI batsman!
I think Pakistan need to set 290-300 unless England batting collapses!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on September 17, 2010, 02:57:23 PM
England do bat very deep these days! Swanny at 10? He's a very good ODI batsman!
I think Pakistan need to set 290-300 unless England batting collapses!
Pete I don'y buy this batting depth theory. If your top 5-6 get skittled for say 40 odd, then you can't hope your tailenders will bail you out. Bresnan Swann, Broad are OK if you chasing 20 runs off 20 balls, but 150 off 20 overs would be out of reach
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on September 17, 2010, 03:00:13 PM
You say that, but when England were in dire straights and Trott was the only guy batting well. And Broad rescued the innings then! So they need the ability! If that had of been Monty, then game over!  >:(
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: mattw on September 17, 2010, 03:02:00 PM
I wouldn't say 150 off 20 is out of reach of the lower order

the likes of Swann, Broad, Bresnan, Wright/Bopara can hold a bat and have scored some good runs in the past - I'm sure they'll have to do something of the sort in the World Cup...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 17, 2010, 03:03:42 PM
Never discount the importance of a lower order who can bat always helps as long as they are in the team for their main string ie a good enough bowler not just because they can bat a bit aswell
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on September 17, 2010, 03:06:47 PM
Never discount the importance of a lower order who can bat always helps as long as they are in the team for their main string ie a good enough bowler not just because they can bat a bit aswell

I'm not discounting it.

You say that, but when England were in dire straights and Trott was the only guy batting well. And Broad rescued the innings then! So they need the ability! If that had of been Monty, then game over!  >:(

It was vs Bangladesh, sides like India, SA, Aus wouldn't allow hat to happen

I wouldn't say 150 off 20 is out of reach of the lower order

the likes of Swann, Broad, Bresnan, Wright/Bopara can hold a bat and have scored some good runs in the past - I'm sure they'll have to do something of the sort in the World Cup...
Once the rate gets that high, the pressure mounts. There's a reason why these guys bat at 7-10....
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on September 17, 2010, 03:07:49 PM
Whatever happens, Pakistan will have to bowl really well!
Score is liklely to be 250-270 on a batting wicket which has been averaging 285-290!
So anything is possible assuming the bowlers come to the party!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on September 17, 2010, 03:10:24 PM
Whatever happens, Pakistan will have to bowl really well!
Score is liklely to be 250-270 on a batting wicket which has been averaging 285-290!
So anything is possible assuming the bowlers come to the party!!
Doubt it Pete, if Pakistan win this I'll be in a state of shock.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: johan95 on September 17, 2010, 07:14:18 PM
Well it's tense now!! Pete, Strauss has Bern using that bat in all shortform cricket this summer: there have been lots of pictures of him with it in nets etc..
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 17, 2010, 07:14:48 PM
We will see if the extra " all rounders " work then
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on September 17, 2010, 07:15:35 PM
close finish but should get over the line...i hope!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Riddy on September 17, 2010, 07:21:36 PM
its in pakistans hands now :/
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 17, 2010, 07:22:57 PM
Poo cakes is along the right lines but I still believe
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on September 17, 2010, 07:23:56 PM
Swanny FTW!!!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: johan95 on September 17, 2010, 07:26:01 PM
Yeah, if he stays in and wright does were good, as thisis gild last over..
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 17, 2010, 07:29:42 PM
Big poo cakes
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Riddy on September 17, 2010, 07:30:16 PM
what is swann doing?!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: johan95 on September 17, 2010, 07:30:43 PM
Grrrr!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 17, 2010, 07:31:35 PM
Cmon the goose
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on September 17, 2010, 07:34:00 PM
making it even more interesting now!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Kal on September 17, 2010, 09:02:36 PM
Oh dear, I take it this is where England have their blip and the Pakistan team look good for one game, normal service to be resumed next match?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: niceonechoppy on September 17, 2010, 09:05:34 PM
Gul bowled magnificently, I think only 3 English batsman got themselves out: Morgan, Swann and Anderson, top effort by Pakistan....
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 17, 2010, 09:09:15 PM
Pakistan are one of those who on their day can beat anyone just don't turn up often enough
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: johnnyw on September 17, 2010, 09:14:46 PM
Twas some ball to Trott
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Riddy on September 17, 2010, 09:17:32 PM
our middle order looks so weak without KP
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on September 17, 2010, 09:26:41 PM
Pakistan are one of those who on their day can beat anyone just don't turn up often enough
A bit unfair I think. They're missing 3 key players, due to their own fault, but Pak are a very good side in the coloured clothes.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 17, 2010, 09:32:46 PM
Not harsh really as it's always been the case from what I have seen world beaters on min other times just not at the races can't understand it with the vast amount if talent in the squad of they were consistent would be winning alot more games due to the talent and ability
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on September 17, 2010, 09:37:35 PM
Not harsh really as it's always been the case from what I have seen world beaters on min other times just not at the races can't understand it with the vast amount if talent in the squad of they were consistent would be winning alot more games due to the talent and ability
Until the last 15 years, Pak where one of the dominate forces in ODI cricket.

More recently, several different controversies has destroyed Pak.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: tim2000s on September 17, 2010, 09:49:17 PM
To be fair we didn't really bat as well as we can or bowl in a similar fashion. Deserved what we got as a result. The crowd on the west side were more interested in the the Pint pot passing than the cricket for most of England's batting...

Wasn't a great match to be at TBH.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: johan95 on September 17, 2010, 10:05:33 PM
Yeah true tim, nothing like some of the great odis eg the 438 game!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on September 17, 2010, 10:30:23 PM
We didn't fire! And looked only half up for it!

But credit where credit's due....Gull looked on excellent form!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: tim2000s on September 17, 2010, 10:54:59 PM
Gul bowled really well, but I stand by the comment that we didn't bat well. Having said that, I'm not sure it was a typical Oval pitch as the Pakistanis found it hard batting too. Gull's ball to get Strauss was an absolute stonker that most batsmen would've had trouble with...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Riddy on September 18, 2010, 08:09:54 AM
surely not again....   http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/other_international/pakistan/9011427.stm
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: essexarsenal on September 18, 2010, 08:13:34 AM
surely not again....   [url]http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/other_international/pakistan/9011427.stm[/url]


LOL
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: johan95 on September 18, 2010, 08:14:35 AM
Unbelieveable if it's  true, especially as afridi is tge more genuine of their skippers...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Riddy on September 18, 2010, 08:21:22 AM
hahahhaha your joking right johan?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: johan95 on September 18, 2010, 08:24:06 AM
Yeah it was sarcasm, but anyone is more genuine than butt tbh.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Riddy on September 18, 2010, 08:24:43 AM
good... nah, afridi would have been worse than butt given the chance
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on September 18, 2010, 08:25:36 AM
Yeah afridi is more of a genuine cheat, like biting the ball, scuffing the pitch with his boots etc. He's not interested in money, just cheating the oppo
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: johan95 on September 18, 2010, 08:27:24 AM
Yeah. Well it's Not even funny now, if they were cheating, I think the country should be banned for 2 years or so...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on September 18, 2010, 11:08:21 AM
Yeah. Well it's Not even funny now, if they were cheating, I think the country should be banned for 2 years or so...
no their ICC member status should revoked
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: eaowbear on September 20, 2010, 08:35:16 AM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/england/9014448.stm

Will be glad when the tour is over...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: eaowbear on September 20, 2010, 11:03:29 AM
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,12341_6389950,00.html

Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 20, 2010, 04:40:12 PM
Any see shoaib just 95.4 mph fair play off his so called shorter run up
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Riddy on September 20, 2010, 04:42:27 PM
strauss looks in great nick
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: johan95 on September 20, 2010, 04:45:40 PM
Until that...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 20, 2010, 04:47:24 PM
NO BALL it's all ok
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: johan95 on September 20, 2010, 04:49:26 PM
I know, but it was a bad shot...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: SillyShilly on September 20, 2010, 05:05:09 PM
Umar Gul bowling at 93mph........really? I think the speed gun is in a generous mood today!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: johan95 on September 20, 2010, 05:07:25 PM
I reckon it'll say ajmal bowls at 75!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 20, 2010, 05:10:03 PM
Strauss very lucky there
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on September 20, 2010, 05:19:28 PM
Biased umpiring?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on September 20, 2010, 05:20:30 PM
Lucky fifty for Strauss
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: johan95 on September 20, 2010, 05:22:53 PM
Nahh it did pitch outside leg; Strauss played well, but was lucky I admit....
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on September 20, 2010, 07:57:37 PM
ANother exciting match by Pakistan wh onow have squared the series.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Riddy on September 20, 2010, 08:04:57 PM
get KP back in that team... the middle order is soooo weak!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on September 20, 2010, 08:06:03 PM
Agreed! I think someone should replace Yardy. Doesn't fit well in the team
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on September 20, 2010, 08:06:14 PM
Wonderful game of cricket.

Razzaq's onslaught was amazing. Gul seems to have rediscovered himself.

Looking forward to a cracking series finale.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on September 20, 2010, 08:07:42 PM
Agreed! I think someone should replace Yardy. Doesn't fit well in the team
Yardy is one dimensional and has minimal talent.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on September 20, 2010, 08:08:02 PM
Abdul Razzaq gets well deserved MOM award. His batting was surely a threat to watch
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on September 20, 2010, 08:09:29 PM
Akhtar also bowled brillantly considering the situation he was in.

Gul I would say is the best swing bowler in ODI and T20s.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Wills on September 20, 2010, 08:14:38 PM
As far as Yardy goes, I think he hasn't showed the potential he did when at sussex
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on September 20, 2010, 08:18:07 PM
County is much different to International areana mate. Bell scored a century in CB40 final and today he failed.

In counties Yasir Arafat is great to but when it comes to international arean he isn't that great I would say.

Lets see what English media accuse Pakistan tomorrow after this loss
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: johan95 on September 20, 2010, 08:20:55 PM
England middle order is shocking at the moment, but I will be interested to see how the 5th odi turns out at the rose bowl..
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on September 20, 2010, 08:21:38 PM
As far as Yardy goes, I think he hasn't showed the potential he did when at sussex
He's domestic OD stats aren't very special. 102 wickets at 38.5. Econ close to 5.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Wills on September 20, 2010, 08:25:03 PM
im on the topic of his batting...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Kaboom786 on September 20, 2010, 08:25:49 PM
Great match, I really enjoyed it
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: johan95 on September 20, 2010, 08:26:55 PM
HIS batting isn't great in international cricket, but they're giving him a fair go good on the selectors for that.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on September 20, 2010, 08:29:51 PM
im on the topic of his batting...


2893 runs @ 23.90

pretty ordinary.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 20, 2010, 08:30:17 PM
Great match and the better team won IMO you can't expect to score 6rpo off gul the way he is bowling need to come up with a plan to get the rate down earlier me thinks
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Wills on September 20, 2010, 08:34:14 PM
Great match and the better team won IMO you can't expect to score 6rpo off gul the way he is bowling need to come up with a plan to get the rate down earlier me thinks
strauss and davies were going at 7+ at one point.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: johan95 on September 20, 2010, 08:38:07 PM
Then all the momentum went like that.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on September 20, 2010, 08:38:17 PM
Davies playing of spin wasn't very good. He could get some pointers from Ramps and Thorpe.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Mr Cricket on September 20, 2010, 08:41:40 PM
England finally being shown up for their lack of world class players, rip out that top 5 and theres not much to come.

Yardy and Bresnan never gonna set the world alight with bat or ball - average players who wouldnt get a look in for the best teams in the world like Aus/India/S.Af
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 21, 2010, 06:51:10 AM
strauss and davies were going at 7+ at one point.

Yes was a great start but what happened in the middle without a wright type batsmen all the pressure is on Morgan to do what razzaq did and to do that off gul is very difficult we needed to carry on at that rate and get the rate in the last 10-15 at 5rpo or less as pak are experts at death bowling in gul and shoaib
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: tim2000s on September 21, 2010, 08:20:41 AM
How about we make it easy for ourselves? Win the toss and bat first so we aren't chasing under lights? In English conditions, with the amount of moisture in the air, Gul and Akhtar reverse swinging it will be difficult for any batsman.....
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Tumo on September 21, 2010, 08:24:34 AM
England finally being shown up for their lack of world class players, rip out that top 5 and theres not much to come.

Yardy and Bresnan never gonna set the world alight with bat or ball - average players who wouldnt get a look in for the best teams in the world like Aus/India/S.Af
I hate to pull you up on this mate, but how do you explain James Hopes? Mr bits and pieces himself! And Ravi Jadeja, not good enough with either bat or ball in the shorter form. Fair enough with SA though, they're not a side to do bits and pieces players!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: arif786 on September 21, 2010, 09:21:49 AM
Yardy is not international level batsman or bowler, strauss doesn't even have faith in his bowling, you can tell. What's he there for?
Bresnan will come through i reckon, he's had good patches, will only be more consistent with experience.

And finally...... WHAT A HITTER RAZZAQ IS, ALWAYS KNEW HE WAS CLASS.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on September 21, 2010, 10:47:28 AM

Bresnan will come through i reckon, he's had good patches, will only be more consistent with experience.

Only time he has been any good was vs Bangladesh. All the top sides smash him around
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: ca_gold on September 21, 2010, 02:32:46 PM
maybe i'm missing something here - but what is so good about bresnan? isnt ajmal shazad a more attacking option? He looks like a very poor mans hoggard who cant swing the ball.

Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Richard on September 21, 2010, 04:23:03 PM
Bresnan is poor.

My favourite piece of journalism from this season. Atherton, "young Tamim Iqbal made Bresnan look like a jobbing trundler in the Bradford League."
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: thebd11 on September 21, 2010, 04:26:49 PM
must say that IMO bresnan doesn't add anything to the team.

We need to have a more balanced team here, and I think that with a top 5 of Strauss, Davies ( on a trial period, although he is doing well atm) , trott, pietersen and bell, followed by a lower middle order of Collingwood Morgan and Broad, with the back 3 being Swann Anderson and a.n.other pace bowler, whoever you think is the man for the job?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on September 21, 2010, 04:42:54 PM
must say that IMO bresnan doesn't add anything to the team.

We need to have a more balanced team here, and I think that with a top 5 of Strauss, Davies ( on a trial period, although he is doing well atm) , trott, pietersen and bell, followed by a lower middle order of Collingwood Morgan and Broad, with the back 3 being Swann Anderson and a.n.other pace bowler, whoever you think is the man for the job?
Morgan at 7? I wouldn't have both Trott and Collingwood
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: thebd11 on September 21, 2010, 04:51:39 PM
I would, after spending a day in double IGCSE physics, you have much time to mull over the imprtant decisions in life, such as the English middle order.

At the end of the day, ODI is different to test in that you don't need to take a set number of wickets to win the match. NAd it's been our middle order and batting in general that has let us down recently.

Also, even with Morgan at 7, we have the bowling line up of, Swann Anderson Broad, a.n.other pace or spinner, surface dependent and situation dependent, alond with Collingwood and Trott who both bowl.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on September 21, 2010, 04:57:55 PM
At this moment in time, looking at form, I would 'rest' Collingwood!
The guy is so much out of form, it's unreal!!!!! I would play Bopara who is in form! Bopara can bowl as well as Colly, so have him instead and see if Colly can get himself sorted! The way he has batted lately, he has been diabolical! I know everyone goes through bad patches, but everytime he starts batting, he looks like such an easy target!  >:(
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: thebd11 on September 21, 2010, 05:01:22 PM
well i was heavily criticised in aother topic for dropping colly in my team, and now its a bad call to keep him,

there are arguments for both, but i always felt bopara was going to be class, he has this aura about hom
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: jimba101 on September 21, 2010, 05:52:14 PM
Colly is in bad form yes, but he was great last time in aus so I think if he can get some runs in the warm up games he's a cert! As for bresnan I have never rated him, much prefer luke wright, although he needs to strenghen his bowling!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on September 22, 2010, 08:02:49 AM
can we win today to secure the series...dont think we want to be chasing under the lights again!!!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 22, 2010, 07:21:16 PM
How does swann keep getting a wicket in his 1st over it's ridiculos surely just try to play out his 1st over with a rep like that
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on September 22, 2010, 07:22:59 PM
good game good game from the chinny spinner!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 22, 2010, 07:25:18 PM
Still I do feel sorry for kamran that was a shocker lol trust an arsenal fan
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Kaboom786 on September 22, 2010, 07:48:47 PM
Billy doctrove has already cost Pakistan a match in this series and now it seems ian gould is going to do the same. Its a shame, if it wasnt for the umpiring howlers in this series by billy doctove, Pakistan would have wrapped up the series. Did anyone see the wide doctrove gave in the 1st over? the guy is blind and incompetent!  and no wonder he was being booed by the Pakistan supporters in the presentation.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: peplow on September 22, 2010, 07:50:59 PM
Billy doctrove has already cost Pakistan a match in this series and now it seems ian gould is going to do the same. Its a shame, if it wasnt for the umpiring howlers in this series by billy doctove, Pakistan would have wrapped up the series. Did anyone see the wide doctrove gave in the 1st over? the guy is blind and incompetent!  and no wonder he was being booed by the Pakistan supporters in the presentation.



take it your a pakistan fan?

To say they;d have wrapped up the series is dubious!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Alvaro on September 22, 2010, 07:52:35 PM
old man beardy now gone with no help from the umpires, just quality bowling...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: mdl_1979 on September 22, 2010, 07:52:59 PM
Brilliant bowling from Swann.  Best spin bowler in world cricket at the moment.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Alvaro on September 22, 2010, 07:55:44 PM
who has a fiver on swann to get a hattrick?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 22, 2010, 07:59:42 PM
I highly doubt pak would've wrapped up the series granted umps not been kind to pak but they were soundly beaten in 1st 2 games and we the same in the next 2 it's just been a good series in my eyes does not need to be marred by blaming umps etc
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: mars on September 22, 2010, 08:28:24 PM
You do have to blame the umpires. The decisions have been shocking. Doesn't matter the fact that it has been against Pakistan. Cricket needs to be more fair and the review system should be brought into ODI cricket too to get rid of those howlers!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: norbs on September 22, 2010, 08:29:06 PM
Oooo ma gold gone!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 22, 2010, 08:35:17 PM
Outstanding run out
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: norbs on September 22, 2010, 08:38:42 PM
All done, good match and no threw it, well except Morgan who hit the stumps
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on September 22, 2010, 08:38:48 PM
Well NAsser Hussain also said that Pakistan got shocking decisions and got wrong decisions. So problem is there with umpires and URDS should be introduced in ODIs as well.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: thebd11 on September 22, 2010, 08:39:03 PM
yes ijaz butt, we were paid to WIN that game , big 2 fingers up to him :)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: tim2000s on September 22, 2010, 08:39:14 PM
Does the ECB now get the point that matches under lights in September are mostly pointless and the side that bats first generally wins?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Wills on September 22, 2010, 08:39:52 PM
Must say England deserved to win after the Irishman's knock.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 22, 2010, 08:42:24 PM
Must say England deserved to win after the Irishman's knock.

Cheap shot
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: tim2000s on September 22, 2010, 08:43:16 PM
Yes, but is such a big win a deliberate result, or did Morgan bat well and Swann bowl well? Earlier goings on in the summer leave you with a seed of doubt, don't they!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: essexarsenal on September 22, 2010, 08:43:32 PM
yes ijaz butt, we were paid to WIN that game , big 2 fingers up to him :)

lmfao
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on September 22, 2010, 08:44:00 PM
And controversial tours ends. Don't know why allegations come out right when Pakistan is in winning position. I must say credit goes to English media who does it soo well :)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: norbs on September 22, 2010, 08:44:24 PM
Must say England deserved to win after the Irishman's knock.

who Owen Morgan Smith?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Wills on September 22, 2010, 08:44:43 PM
Cheap shot
i have the south african aspect to back me up if needed! ;)

and norbs, is that meant to be funny?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 22, 2010, 08:46:01 PM
Still a cheap shot only one saffer in today thank you
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Kaboom786 on September 22, 2010, 08:46:18 PM
Umpiring has been pathetic all series. If decision review system was used the series result would have been more fair. And Pakistan might have won the 2nd odi if Strauss's caught behind was referred to 3rd umpire. ICC definitely need to remove billy frm Pakistans matches because he has cost Pakistan lot of matches and a test series I remember against WI.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: norbs on September 22, 2010, 08:46:50 PM
And controversial tours ends. Don't know why allegations come out right when Pakistan is in winning position.

There has been other controversial tours ??? who was involved in the last one? 
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: norbs on September 22, 2010, 08:47:36 PM
and norbs, is that meant to be funny?

Yes I am a comedy genius
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on September 22, 2010, 08:48:25 PM
There has been other controversial tours ??? who was involved in the last one?

In 2006 Pakistan was FALSELY accused of ball tempering which was proved that Pakistan were CLEAN!

Inzamam was too good that he forgave Hair :)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 22, 2010, 08:49:56 PM
How was it proved as result was reversed but then reversed back I thought so last I heard it went down as a forfeit?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on September 22, 2010, 08:50:41 PM
How was it proved as result was reversed but then reversed back I thought so last I heard it went down as a forfeit?

I think it ended as a draw. But talking about ball tempering allegations they were proved to be wrong.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Alvaro on September 22, 2010, 08:51:07 PM
In 2006 Pakistan was FALSELY accused of ball tempering which was proved that Pakistan were CLEAN!

Inzamam was too good that he forgave Hair :)

^go and chew on a cricket ball ...^
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: norbs on September 22, 2010, 08:51:20 PM
In 2006 Pakistan was FALSELY accused of ball tempering which was proved that Pakistan were CLEAN!

Inzamam was too good that he forgave Hair :)

Did he bite it to smell it or something?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: norbs on September 22, 2010, 08:51:54 PM
Actually enough from me - great last 2 games in the ODI
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 22, 2010, 08:52:23 PM
It was turned into a draw by icc but then turned back to a forfeit as ecb kicked off
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on September 22, 2010, 08:53:49 PM
Funny how you guys react that you don't know anything. Weren't Pakistan falsely accused of ball tempering in 2006?
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on September 22, 2010, 08:57:21 PM
Funny how you guys react that you don't know anything. Weren't Pakistan falsely accused of ball tempering in 2006?
Why the need to bring it up again?

ICC did change the result, but MCC changed it back. Therefore England won 3-0 in 2006.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Opener on September 22, 2010, 08:58:24 PM
Can't wait for the Ashes.  :)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: roco on September 22, 2010, 09:01:55 PM
Same old story for me poor Pakistan other nations have been charged for ball tampering still remember athertons one just we get on with it and don't wine
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on September 23, 2010, 09:24:02 AM
I think any piece of journalism from the Daily Mail needs to be questioned. Here is the link - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/cricket/article-1314414/Shoaib-Akhtar-caught-camera-ball-tampering-row-sours-Englands-win.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/cricket/article-1314414/Shoaib-Akhtar-caught-camera-ball-tampering-row-sours-Englands-win.html)

Dont think there is much in it to be honest. Im sure if you took stills of every cricketer shining the ball you could claim something dodgy is going on. Plus the pic they have zoomed in on, is quite clearly a different picture (check the location of his whites string and the position of his thumb). I think this is just a publicity grab for readers/visits to their site
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Ayrtek Cricket on September 23, 2010, 09:27:33 AM
Stories like this are just trying to fuel the fire IMO....the series is over we came out ontop now lets put it to bed and look forward to the Ashes :D
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: eaowbear on September 23, 2010, 09:32:52 AM
Was there yesterday and was a really volatile atmosphere especially whenever Trott fielded on the boundary edge with the applause deafening out the cat calls! Morgan was again fantastic and his cricketing brain is quite awesome while Colly's catch was worth the entry fee alone!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on September 23, 2010, 11:22:11 AM
It was good to see the mid order firing, even though Englands top order let us down for once.
IMO, the ODI series was the most entertaining series! The T20 was a little one sided, and the Test was reasonable.
But the ODI was swinging one way then the other. England recovered well to take the series in the end, but it was competitive!
But Pakistan had a few positives to take away with them! I think that Amir with with the ball, and Umar with the bat looked particularly promising....and (assuming Amir is cleared ok) they will prove to be very dangerous players in the future.
Also positive for Pakistan is the depth of players they have - when Butt & co were flown home, they still put together some decent replacements for the ODIs. I still would have drafted in Younis Khan to bat alongside Mo-Yo to give the batting line up a better mix of experience to encourage the younger players! though!

But you can never estimate how the teams have fully done until you see how they perform against other opposition. So am looking forward to the next lot of matches England and Pakistan play! So looking forward to Pakistan playing South Africa and New Zealand! I just hope that the Butt & Co situation is resolved by then!
And hope that England perform better down under this time!  :(
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on September 23, 2010, 11:24:22 AM
I wonder whether the ICC have been waiting for the series to finish to make a further announcement about the 3 suspended players, seems like thay've had a fair bit of time to make their minds up one way or another
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on September 23, 2010, 11:37:53 AM
If they lose Amir, that would be an immense loss to Pakistan!
I'd even go as far as saying that he has the potential to be the number 1 bowler on the planet within the next couple of years, assuming he doesn't get banned of course!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on September 23, 2010, 11:44:04 AM
ive read that they were offering him a plea bargain, grass the other two up and only receive a fine or short ban. Cant see that happening though to be honest
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: thebd11 on September 23, 2010, 12:43:32 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/cricket/article-1314414/Shoaib-Akhtar-caught-camera-ball-tampering-row-sours-Englands-win.html

please not again :(
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: tim2000s on September 23, 2010, 01:51:49 PM
Player tries to lift the seam but isn't quite surreptitious enough. Shock. Not.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Colesy on September 23, 2010, 01:55:38 PM
I hope it isn't as deliberate as it looks. I like Akhtar because I think he's an amazing bowler. It's a shame this summer has been so controversial.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: iand123 on September 23, 2010, 02:18:01 PM
Those daily mail pics are farcical. The zoomed in image isnt even of the same photo as the large version

They should stick to intimidating ethnic minorities rather than trying to be serious about sport!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on September 23, 2010, 07:09:08 PM
ive read that they were offering him a plea bargain, grass the other two up and only receive a fine or short ban. Cant see that happening though to be honest
Pak government has said there will be no plea bargains.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Wills on September 23, 2010, 09:35:20 PM
If they lose Amir, that would be an immense loss to Pakistan!
I'd even go as far as saying that he has the potential to be the number 1 bowler on the planet within the next couple of years, assuming he doesn't get banned of course!
entirely agree
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Kaboom786 on September 23, 2010, 10:14:55 PM
NOTW, The Sun & Daily mail are shameless. So shocked by thier disgusting campaign especially The Sun coverage in the back pages today. They have sunk to new depths - and I thought I had seen everything in the last 25 years.
I am the last person to use the race card but today's coverage is surley crossing the line as they bashed every Pak player - even thier personal features such as Fawads teeth.
NOTW destroyed the career of a simple man Hameed and dailymail done utmost to put down Shoaib Akhtars last performance and denigrated Pakistan and its fans in many ways that your large following of "hollow" like minded readers have lapped up.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Cover_Drive on September 23, 2010, 10:29:49 PM
If they lose Amir, that would be an immense loss to Pakistan!
I'd even go as far as saying that he has the potential to be the number 1 bowler on the planet within the next couple of years, assuming he doesn't get banned of course!
Yes you are right but Pakistan has always produced great fast bowlers so hopefully Pakistan will get another one like him or better.

Apart from Amir another great bowler is Asif. I read somewhere that they won't get any charges by Scotland Yard and the upper police (I don't know it's name). So the only people who can fine or do any action is ICC.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Kaboom786 on September 23, 2010, 10:36:31 PM
Thats correct CD.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Kaboom786 on September 24, 2010, 10:02:31 PM
Those daily mail pics are farcical. The zoomed in image isnt even of the same photo as the large version

They should stick to intimidating ethnic minorities rather than trying to be serious about sport!
I once said to someone that I wouldn't wipe my backside with the Daily Mail - he replied with 'the Daily Mail is the sort of paper you wipe your ar5e with - and more (No Swearing Please) comes off than when you started with!'
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: tim2000s on September 24, 2010, 10:28:05 PM
If the UKIP and other far right parties made newspapers, they'd probably be a lot like the Daily Mail.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Kaboom786 on September 26, 2010, 12:36:04 AM
Trott in Trouble....again?
Every Pakistanis favourite paper seems to think he abused a fan on the third test match.

JONATHAN TROTT faces an ECB investigation after being accused of verbally abusing a fan.

The controversial England batsman was involved in an ugly spat with a male spectator while fielding on the boundary on day four of the third Test against Pakistan at the Oval.

Trott snapped after being mocked for his slow scoring rate the previous day, labelling the spectator "a f****** p***k" in front of hundreds of shocked witnesses.

One fan said: "A well-to-do bloke in the crowd shouted out sarcastically, 'Trott, well batted yesterday. Kept me entertained all day'!"

Two balls later, Trott, who hit 36 from 130 balls in a losing cause, stared at the fan and screamed: "Hey, four eyes! Have you ever batted out here? Then shut the f*** up then!"

Trott is then alleged to have turned his back on the stunned crowd and loudly muttered: "You f****** p***k".

Trott's extraordinary outburst is sure to infuriate England's management and raises further doubts over his temperament ahead of the Ashes.

Last week he escaped with a rap on the knuckles from the match referee after almost coming to blows with Pakistan fast bowler Wahab Riaz in the nets at Lord's. Riaz is threatening to sue the 30-year-old for allegedly calling him "a match fixer".
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The story has came out quite late( if true) but Trott really does have a big mouth for such an average player.

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/spor...ing-a-fan.html
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Tumo on September 26, 2010, 01:11:11 AM
Average player? Mate, I don't know what you're missing. His debut test? 40 in the first innings, the only way he looked like he was gonna get out was run out, by some outstanding fielding, and a ton in the second innings. He averages 55 in tests and 48 in ODIs, and mid 40s in domestic cricket. The guy is an outstanding cricketer! He's not the greatest at keeping out of trouble though, he needs to watch that, but at least he isn't gonna back down!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on September 26, 2010, 07:50:06 AM
The story has came out quite late( if true) but Trott really does have a big mouth for such an average player.

Sorry - average in comparison to who? In comparison to Sachin, Lara, etc!
His averages are up with almost anyones, so I think calling him average is perhaps a little silly?
Annoying batsman, ok - will give you that one. But average?  ???
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Riddy on September 26, 2010, 08:54:40 AM
and he least he has some balls...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Liam-SCCC on September 26, 2010, 01:54:07 PM
Trott is class!

And he will need a bit of fight in australia this winter.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: thebd11 on September 26, 2010, 01:55:32 PM
Always a fan of Trott, good to see the bears doing well for the national side. All we need now is for a Bear to hit a ton at Edgbaston, never been done :(

But Trott has balls and I think he will excel down under :)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Kaboom786 on September 26, 2010, 03:07:57 PM
Personally I think he is limited in shot making ability to become a high-class player. He will need to adapt otherwise teams will soon work him out that he plays most shots to the leg side. Although I accept that he scored runs for England when it mattered most. If Eng players are taking minor chants or words from a handful of fans in a series they won, then how will they handle the legendary abuse & comedic sledging of the Aus fans?? The Aussies will have a field day - I reckon he might even cry
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: thebd11 on September 26, 2010, 03:10:40 PM
As it hasn't been proved and no action has been taken, i think Pakistan suppourters are on incredibly thin ice.

Not sure why, but something about their test match CAPTAIN and 2 of their fast bowlers being formally suspended by the ICC might have something to do with it.

Oh and aswell, the chairman of the PCB being sued by the ECB.

All in all a great thank you from Pakistan for us kindly letting you use our grounds this summer :)

I'm sure we won't be seeing you for at least another 10 years :)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: alexrickyponting on September 26, 2010, 08:15:18 PM
Personally i think he needs to ignore things like fan abuse and get back to his game. When i watched the highlights of the 5th ODI it showed him walking out and he looked really aggressive, like he wanted someone to start something with him whereas ive always felt he was never very "confrontational" as it were whenever ive seen him before :)
Still its from the NOTW, probably only 2% of the story isnt complete boolocks...
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Kaboom786 on September 26, 2010, 08:31:48 PM
The English tabloids are well known to kick their own teams and players, as long as their isn't any Pakistanis around that is. Just look at what they do with the footballers. If the English team get a couple of early losses in Australia.....than the notw will show their true colours
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Kaboom786 on September 26, 2010, 08:36:14 PM
Now that Pak are long gone home...the scummy tabloids will focus its attention on to destabilising their football & cricket teams chances wherever they go.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Jeet on September 26, 2010, 09:42:49 PM
Sorry - average in comparison to who? In comparison to Sachin, Lara, etc!
His averages are up with almost anyones, so I think calling him average is perhaps a little silly?
Annoying batsman, ok - will give you that one. But average?  ???
Tendulkar, Lara etc have played over 100 Tests, we'll wait and see what Trott averages after he's played 50 Tests.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: petehosk on September 26, 2010, 10:13:12 PM
I actually do think that Trott is average when comparing him to Sachin and Lara, but then who isn't!!!
The point I was trying to make was that Trott is ONLY average in comparison to the best! When you compare him to everyone else, then he is far from average.
Time will tell how well he'll be doing in a year or two though!
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: 100 not out on September 26, 2010, 10:19:38 PM
u dont have to be naturally gifted. ... . .and have lots of flair. .  .to be a great.


look at someone like steve waugh. .. .he is one of my favourite.

i think trott is a limited batsman . . . . .but plays within his bubble....the aussies will certainly try to put him through the psychological mincer. . . .lets see how he copes.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: eaowbear on September 27, 2010, 08:31:04 AM
Without Trott this summer we would have been in so much more trouble than we already were and his temperament was one of the major reasons behind this. While all the other batsmen were falling at Lords he just got on with batting, playing what he wanted to play and leaving anything he could. He has really impressed me this season and hope his form continues this winter as the Aussies are sure to try and give him the hurry up. However, being a Warwickshire Bear I'm sure he can cope! ;)
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: armie on September 27, 2010, 10:28:12 AM
As it hasn't been proved and no action has been taken, i think Pakistan suppourters are on incredibly thin ice.

Not sure why, but something about their test match CAPTAIN and 2 of their fast bowlers being formally suspended by the ICC might have something to do with it.

Oh and aswell, the chairman of the PCB being sued by the ECB.

All in all a great thank you from Pakistan for us kindly letting you use our grounds this summer :)

I'm sure we won't be seeing you for at least another 10 years :)

Nothing has so far been proven, infact, Mazhar Majeed has been allowed to continue his usual role at his football club by the concerned sports body. What i read was that Scotland Yard actually were follow him for money laundering through his football club and alleged spot fixing came form the news paper. I am still waiting for the damning evidence from the tabloid that the video was not filmed after day 1 had concluded. There probably is nothing to prove it. I don't think that Scotland Yard or ICC or PCB would be able to prove. If anyone is guilty, without substantial evidence a ban may not come though the players involved may be dropped for a long time to come from the team. 
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: Talisman on September 27, 2010, 10:56:08 AM
Facts are different to accusations and prosecutions, the fact that no benefit in monetary terms was gained by the bowling of the no balls in the UK means that no criminal charges can be brought. So it makes no odds if they bowled them on purpose or not in the eyes of the law, so the fact that the police will not be taking action does not prove the players innocence.

As for the stupid counter claim of the fix being recorded the day after the police and ICC were sent full transcripts of the video before the start of the days play. The balls were bowled as per the recording and the ICC has the proof of this.

It is also well known that gambling is not legal in Pakistan yet it goes on, the sting on the illegal bookies will not be reported and so proof of this is not likely to be given to the authorities by those breaking the law.

Long term problems resulting from sub continent gambling has been around for quite some time, coupled with the odd results recorded by Pakistan and previous accusations and prosecutions of players and former players have been long known and allowed to be swept under the carpet. Do we expect anything more than another round of this now? I think not, judge the future by the actions of the past.
Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: eaowbear on September 28, 2010, 01:01:53 PM
Found this video clip of Shoaib bowling rapidly against Ponting...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14ycl4X7ptk

Title: Re: ENG vs PAK -
Post by: eaowbear on September 28, 2010, 03:05:56 PM
And found that the England team have all just returned from Germany for their pre-Ashes bonding trip...

http://www.cricinfo.com/the-ashes-2010-11/content/current/story/479098.html